ForeverRDjazz wrote:
I don't see a deal getting done with the Heat any time soon.
Especially if Danny believes Miami is tampering with Donovan.
Moderators: Inigo Montoya, FJS
ForeverRDjazz wrote:
I don't see a deal getting done with the Heat any time soon.
AingesBurner wrote:ForeverRDjazz wrote:
I don't see a deal getting done with the Heat any time soon.
Especially if Danny believes Miami is tampering with Donovan.
ForeverRDjazz wrote:AingesBurner wrote:ForeverRDjazz wrote:
I don't see a deal getting done with the Heat any time soon.
Especially if Danny believes Miami is tampering with Donovan.
Isn't that why we only had 58 picks in this years draft? Tampering?
AingesBurner wrote:ForeverRDjazz wrote:AingesBurner wrote:
Especially if Danny believes Miami is tampering with Donovan.
Isn't that why we only had 58 picks in this years draft? Tampering?
Yes
ForeverRDjazz wrote:AingesBurner wrote:ForeverRDjazz wrote:Isn't that why we only had 58 picks in this years draft? Tampering?
Yes
I think Danny will push a deal with Nets Suns before letting the Heat get Mitchell?
dr0welf wrote:I don't think we get Durant, but I bet we are part of the facilitation of someone getting Durant:
Something Like:
GSW get Durant, Vanderbilt
Utah get (players from team taking Simmons), Wiggins, Kuminga
Brooklyn gets Mitchell, Conley, Beverly, Wiseman, Gay
Another team: Simmons
Brooklyn can't have both Mitchell and Simmons because of their rookie max extensions and both would be traded to them. They can only have 1 so they move Simmons for Mitchell who is guaranteed to play. Instead of us taking Simmons he gets routed to another team for players unless we know he will play for us then we could take him, but really risky. I would love to have Simmons from a couple years ago, but I am a little gun shy with the mental issues.
Obviously picks would have to be included as well. The majority coming from GSW, not sure how many it would take for Brooklyn to move where they would move Simmons contract.
gobullschi wrote:Tony Bradley + 2023 1st (via POR lotto protected) for Jarred Vanderbilt
AingesBurner wrote:gobullschi wrote:Tony Bradley + 2023 1st (via POR lotto protected) for Jarred Vanderbilt
Rather hold onto Vandy.
If Mitchell is involved going to Brooklyn to pay for KD. We sure as hell better be getting nearly every young asset the warriors have: Kuminga, Moody, Wiseman, Poole. Warriors picks with KD back to them aren't worth ****. Wiggins doesn't do anything for us, so he'd be rerouted elsewhere.dr0welf wrote:I don't think we get Durant, but I bet we are part of the facilitation of someone getting Durant:
Something Like:
GSW get Durant, Vanderbilt
Utah get (players from team taking Simmons), Wiggins, Kuminga
Brooklyn gets Mitchell, Conley, Beverly, Wiseman, Gay
Another team: Simmons
Brooklyn can't have both Mitchell and Simmons because of their rookie max extensions and both would be traded to them. They can only have 1 so they move Simmons for Mitchell who is guaranteed to play. Instead of us taking Simmons he gets routed to another team for players unless we know he will play for us then we could take him, but really risky. I would love to have Simmons from a couple years ago, but I am a little gun shy with the mental issues.
Obviously picks would have to be included as well. The majority coming from GSW, not sure how many it would take for Brooklyn to move where they would move Simmons contract.

Hoops Addict wrote:We are not trading MItchell for another great player....if we trade we trade for picks......there is no reason to go sideways.
Barnes and Giddey are a gap like Mitchell is to current low value Simmonsbkohler wrote:Hoops Addict wrote:We are not trading MItchell for another great player....if we trade we trade for picks......there is no reason to go sideways.
I think there’s definitely a possibility you trade him for another realllly young good player. Barnes, Giddey, etc


CAE15 wrote:Barnes and Giddey are a gap like Mitchell is to current low value Simmonsbkohler wrote:Hoops Addict wrote:We are not trading MItchell for another great player....if we trade we trade for picks......there is no reason to go sideways.
I think there’s definitely a possibility you trade him for another realllly young good player. Barnes, Giddey, etc
Yes, a massive one. Barnes is a legitimate centerpiece to a superstar trade. The same can not be said for Giddey.bkohler wrote:CAE15 wrote:Barnes and Giddey are a gap like Mitchell is to current low value Simmonsbkohler wrote:
I think there’s definitely a possibility you trade him for another realllly young good player. Barnes, Giddey, etc
Sorry confused by this - are you saying there’s a gap between Barnes and Giddey?
