OT: NBA Finals

Sloanfeld · Post #1 » by **Sloanfeld** » Fri May 28, 2010 3:39 am

WOW Anyone watching this Suns/Lakers game? It's ending a lot like game six in the 2006 first round. Go SunS!!!!!!!!!!

Sloanfeld · Post #2 » by **Sloanfeld** » Fri May 28, 2010 3:42 am

****, Artest just redeemed himself for that bonehead missed three with 22 seconds on the shotclock.

MeestR · Post #3 » by **MeestR** » Fri May 28, 2010 3:44 am

i hate the lakers. great game though, cudda been better. i hate the lakers.

Sloanfeld · Post #4 » by **Sloanfeld** » Fri May 28, 2010 3:46 am

Me too, can't stand the stupid Fakers. They are good in closeout games, let's see what happens.

A small part of me just feels like the Jazz just lost at the buzzer because of the excitement of that Richardson three.

Jazzfan12 · Post #5 » by **Jazzfan12** » Fri May 28, 2010 3:55 am

Why don't teams box out in the last minute of Laker playoff games?

seejaydeja · Post #6 » by **seejaydeja** » Fri May 28, 2010 3:57 am

Two tip ins at the buzzer that have kept Lakers in the playoffs...They make it when it counts.

Post #7 » by **DelaneyRudd** » Fri May 28, 2010 5:32 am

I want the Lakers to win it all. A ring will change Nash and VCs legacies. 2 rings is bigger for KGs legacy than just another one for Kobe and Phil. It promotes the status quo and makes not having a ring not as huge a deal.

edfmx86 · Post #8 » by **edfmx86** » Fri May 28, 2010 6:39 am

are you serious? i want anyone BUT the lakers.

Post #9 » by **DelaneyRudd** » Fri May 28, 2010 6:43 am

What does a Laker championship mean? nothing

LjJazzman · Post #10 » by **LjJazzman** » Fri May 28, 2010 9:15 am

I completely understand Deaneys logic. It still too hard for me to hope the lakers win it tho...

ORL
Boston
Suns
Lakers

Thats the order of who i'd hate seeing win the least.

Reckless · Post #11 » by **Reckless** » Fri May 28, 2010 9:28 am

I don't care for either team. I just hope the east wins in the finals(but Boston hurt themselves by not winning game 4)

UTJazzFan_Echo1 · Post #12 » by **UTJazzFan_Echo1** » Fri May 28, 2010 6:02 pm

Is there really any doubt now that the Lakers are the luckiest team in the history of the NBA?

I had Orlando winning the series from the start, I got them winning in 7 still. Making history baby.

Post #13 » by **StocktonShorts** » Fri May 28, 2010 6:44 pm

UTJazzFan_Echo1 wrote:Is there really any doubt now that the Lakers are the luckiest team in the history of the NBA?

Phoenix wasn't good enough to be in position to win the game on a last second shot; LA was.

Phoenix needed a lot of luck to even tie that game. On their last possession they missed two consecutive threes that just happened to bounce long; then finally J-Rich BANKED in a three. That's more lucky than Artest out-hustling the rest of the Suns for that put-back.

I dislike the Lakers as much as the next guy, but I think luck has very little to do with their success. Really good teams rely on luck for their wins much less frequently than other teams.

UTJazzFan_Echo1 · Post #14 » by **UTJazzFan_Echo1** » Fri May 28, 2010 7:13 pm

HappyProle wrote:
UTJazzFan_Echo1 wrote:Is there really any doubt now that the Lakers are the luckiest team in the history of the NBA?

Phoenix wasn't good enough to be in position to win the game on a last second shot; LA was.

Phoenix needed a lot of luck to even tie that game. On their last possession they missed two consecutive threes that just happened to bounce long; then finally J-Rich BANKED in a three. That's more lucky than Artest out-hustling the rest of the Suns for that put-back.

I dislike the Lakers as much as the next guy, but I think luck has very little to do with their success. Really good teams rely on luck for their wins much less frequently than other teams.

Youre joking me right? What other team in the NBA has had more luck than the Lakers? Everything from trades to draft picks to game winning shots the get lucky with.

Artest was what? 1 for 10 when he made that GW shot? Off of a Kobe airball? Luckiest game winner in NBA playoff history hands down.

Phoenix deserved to win the game, they fought back and out played the Lakers down the stretch. The entire Laker nation and organization knows that they were extremely lucky to win that game.

Good teams will win championships but the Lakers are the luckiest good team in history.

And for the J-Rich bank three....how many open threes didn't go in for them before that? They outworked LA and somehow had two perfect looking shots rim out so I don't buy the luck argument for that one bit. The Suns are one of the unluckiest teams in the NBA if you look back at their history...

MeestR · Post #15 » by **MeestR** » Fri May 28, 2010 8:12 pm

UTJazzFan_Echo1 wrote:
HappyProle wrote:
UTJazzFan_Echo1 wrote:Is there really any doubt now that the Lakers are the luckiest team in the history of the NBA?

Phoenix wasn't good enough to be in position to win the game on a last second shot; LA was.

Phoenix needed a lot of luck to even tie that game. On their last possession they missed two consecutive threes that just happened to bounce long; then finally J-Rich BANKED in a three. That's more lucky than Artest out-hustling the rest of the Suns for that put-back.

I dislike the Lakers as much as the next guy, but I think luck has very little to do with their success. Really good teams rely on luck for their wins much less frequently than other teams.
Youre joking me right? What other team in the NBA has had more luck than the Lakers? Everything from trades to draft picks to game winning shots the get lucky with.

Artest was what? 1 for 10 when he made that GW shot? Off of a Kobe airball? Luckiest game winner in NBA playoff history hands down.

Phoenix deserved to win the game, they fought back and out played the Lakers down the stretch. The entire Laker nation and organization knows that they were extremely lucky to win that game.

Good teams will win championships but the Lakers are the luckiest good team in history.

And for the J-Rich bank three....how many open threes didn't go in for them before that? They outworked LA and somehow had two perfect looking shots rim out so I don't buy the luck argument for that one bit. The Suns are one of the unluckiest teams in the NBA if you look back at their history...

"one of"

i once compared the suns and the jazz to a friend and suns fan. he tried to say how phoenix has had it worse off over the years than the jazz. turns out, wikipedia backed me up....they are virtually identical franchises considering their overall team statistics over the last 40 years. as far as appearances, championships, records, and overall awards are concerned.

Sloanfeld · Post #16 » by **Sloanfeld** » Fri May 28, 2010 10:14 pm

Artest came over from the weak side to get that rebound. Hardly unlucky.

UTJazzFan_Echo1 · Post #17 » by **UTJazzFan_Echo1** » Fri May 28, 2010 11:32 pm

The media is even saying that the Lakers are the luckiest team in the NBA. It's not even worth debating, if you can't see how lucky they have been over all of these years then you are completely blind.

Post #18 » by **StocktonShorts** » Fri May 28, 2010 11:49 pm

UTJazzFan_Echo1 wrote:The media is even saying that the Lakers are the luckiest team in the NBA. It's not even worth debating, if you can't see how lucky they have been over all of these years then you are completely blind.

Well if "The media" says it then it must be true.

I'll humor you. How have the Lakers been lucky "over all these years?"

MeestR · Post #19 » by **MeestR** » Sat May 29, 2010 12:46 am

divac for kobe
kwame for pau
boss's daughter for phil

just off the top of my head. im sure there are more.

Post #20 » by **DelaneyRudd** » Sat May 29, 2010 12:59 am

Fish for a family emergency; Bynum was a good decision, Artest was a good move, letting Ariza walk is a good move. They get the benefit of luck and good decisions and big market perks above that.