Trade Idea With Pacers

TheOneAndOnly · Post #1 » by **TheOneAndOnly** » Thu Dec 30, 2010 3:54 am

Jefferson/Kirilenko/Price/Hayward

for

Hibbert/Granger/Ford/Dunleavy

Utah:

Williams
Miles
Granger
Millsap
Hibbert

hoops4life · Post #2 » by **hoops4life** » Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:19 am

Could be interesting.

HammerDunk · Post #3 » by **HammerDunk** » Thu Dec 30, 2010 6:05 am

WTF are you nuts? Neither team would do this. Quit going to the trade machine on espn, nobody likes your trades.

colts2004 · Post #4 » by **colts2004** » Thu Dec 30, 2010 12:01 pm

As a Pacer fan, as much as I would love Jefferson and have Haywood in Indiana, your nuts!

babyjax13 · Post #5 » by **babyjax13** » Thu Dec 30, 2010 7:01 pm

Pacers don't touch this, Jazz are all over it.

The59Sound · Post #6 » by **The59Sound** » Thu Dec 30, 2010 7:45 pm

Pacers want no part of this. Not sure I do either.

countrybama24 · Post #7 » by **countrybama24** » Thu Dec 30, 2010 10:14 pm

Williams
Bell
Granger
Millsap
Hibbert

I would be pissed if the Jazz turned this down. We get a shot blocker in the middle, who is a great distributor actually so I think he would fit the system great, and a wing scorer who can score in bunches and defend. I think it solves the two biggest problems the Jazz have. Giving up Jefferson and Hayward is totally worth it imo.

That said. Pacers never do this. They have ZERO need for AKs expiring because they have a ton of cap space.

countrybama24 · Post #8 » by **countrybama24** » Thu Dec 30, 2010 10:17 pm

I also think the lesson of these posts is that we need a stickied trade thread. We've been over granger / AI / trade rumor of the month scenarios before.

hoops4life · Post #9 » by **hoops4life** » Thu Dec 30, 2010 11:18 pm

Somebody isn't going to read through multiple pages of trades to see if this has been proposed before or not.

GP · Post #10 » by GP » Thu Dec 30, 2010 11:22 pm

I love this trade simply because of all the players moving around, I am sick of realistic trades, too boring. BTW paces balk, the jazz would do this instantly. Hibbert looks to be a very solid center and well, theres Granger being thrown in too.

countrybama24 · Post #11 » by **countrybama24** » Sat Jan 1, 2011 6:27 pm

hoops4life wrote:Somebody isn't going to read through multiple pages of trades to see if this has been proposed before or not.

Sure, but then it clutters up one thread, instead of creating multiple new ones. I don't care that much, just seems more efficient.

hoops4life · Post #12 » by **hoops4life** » Sat Jan 1, 2011 7:48 pm

I would argue against it being more efficient.