RealGM

What do you think?

Jazz offer 3 and 12 for the 1st pick.....to take IRVING?

You like?

That seems fair for both teams.

Jazz maybe do it.
Cleveland maybe also.

Jazz - Yes
Cleveland - Hell No

LMAO. #1 gives you the choice between two outstanding players, #3 is a gamble.

How about #3, #12, and the GS pick?

i think the 3 and 12 could get you the #2 pick. Irving is wearing a Cavs uniform next season

i don't know if anyone wants to be #3 pick right now, there are 2 great franchise players. rest of the field is a ?

Cavs already have the 4th pick. I think they want the elite guy at 1 more.

I would do #3, Harris and #12 + a future protected 1st to make this work. But I highly doubt Cleveland would even listen to any offers. They've been the #1 team associated with Irving since early in the draft process, even during the season, and I would have a hard time seeing them let him get by them.

All that said, we're at least in striking distance and Cleveland is so devoid of talent right now that they might be interested in looking at volume.

As a Cleveland fan, allow me to give you our offical response:

STFU and GTFO.

Heh. Lets see what happens in the combine and workouts before we decide for sure.

BosBorgon wrote:As a Cleveland fan, allow me to give you our offical response:

STFU and GTFO.

As a Jazz fan I completely agree with this. Also I still think B-Knight and Irving are similar players and one of them is going to be available at #3.

i'd really temper my excitement for irving. i have reservations about him being the #1 pick even and we don't know who will stand out in workouts. it is looking like a possibility that kanter might make a huge leap.

BosBorgon wrote:As a Cleveland fan, allow me to give you our offical response:

STFU and GTFO.

Did this turn into the Cleveland board when I wasn't looking?

Yeah right...

Now that the word is out that Irving said no to Lebron's marketing company, there is practically zero chance Cleveland doesn't take him.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news;_ylt=A ... raft051711

yeah, I kinda agree with the Cleveland poster. Time for everyone to STFU about drafting Irving. He's a lock to go to Cleveland.

I mean we can dream, but, I think that door is about closed at this point. Oh, and having Baron and Sessions is NO REASON to not take Irving.

Irving is gone. Lets face it. Time to move on to who goes #2.

jazzfan1971 wrote:yeah, I kinda agree with the Cleveland poster. Time for everyone to STFU about drafting Irving. He's a lock to go to Cleveland.

For the record, I agree with the STFU part, just not the GTFO part, cuz I kinda like talking Jazz basketball with you guys here.

HappyProle wrote:

jazzfan1971 wrote:yeah, I kinda agree with the Cleveland poster. Time for everyone to STFU about drafting Irving. He's a lock to go to Cleveland.

For the record, I agree with the STFU part, just not the GTFO part, cuz I kinda like talking Jazz basketball with you guys here.

still if some one could me explain why they are so much in picking Irving not Williams specially with there roster

HappyProle wrote:

jazzfan1971 wrote:yeah, I kinda agree with the Cleveland poster. Time for everyone to STFU about drafting Irving. He's a lock to go to Cleveland.

For the record, I agree with the STFU part, just not the GTFO part, cuz I kinda like talking Jazz basketball with you guys here.

It's just that a "STFU and GTFO" in tandem is funnier than a solo "STFU"

eLo wrote:

HappyProle wrote:

jazzfan1971 wrote:yeah, I kinda agree with the Cleveland poster. Time for everyone to STFU about drafting Irving. He's a lock to go to Cleveland.

For the record, I agree with the STFU part, just not the GTFO part, cuz I kinda like talking Jazz basketball with you guys here.

still if some one could me explain why they are so much in picking Irving not Williams specially with there roster

I'd happily take Williams if he fell to us at 4 (BPA and all that), but PF is the one spit we have a young keeper (Hickson)