Starting Lineup--Why No Bell
Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2012 1:22 am
After watching the games thus far, the lineup I would be starting is:
Harris, Hayward, Howard, Millsap and Favors.
That lineup will get the Jazz off to their fastest start offensively. That's important because the Jazz play better when they get out the gate faster.
Watson, Bell/Burks, Miles, Jefferson, Kanter coming off the bench give the Jazz a bench that can score and play defense.
Whatever Bell brings to the first unit in defense, he's costing them more in sluggish starts. Hayward plays better from the 2 than the 3 and Howard is a quick attach threat from the 3. Favors will pass the ball out of the post (Sap won't--don't know why) and Hayward can get assists for Favors, Howard and Millsap. Harris, Howard and Hayward can and will run.
I've heard Phil Johnson say that the 2 and 3 are the same and it doesn't matter if Hayward is at the 2 or the 3, but the stats don't support it. The best scoring unit for the Jazz is the one I mentioned that should start. So moving Hayward to the 2 changes the dynamics of that group.
This was the lineup I liked coming out of training camp and still is after 8 regular season games. It's the lineup that's been the most productive, so I see Corbin's bias for Bell as a problem.
I think Bell has plenty to contribute but not as a starter. As a starter, his defensive contributions are diminished by the slow start the Jazz seem to have too often.
(I agree with Amish that starting Bell with limited minutes is at least rational and reasonable. I just have a bias toward optimal starting offense. If an opposing player is hot coming out of the box, we'll deal with it defensively and change lineups accordingly.)
Harris, Hayward, Howard, Millsap and Favors.
That lineup will get the Jazz off to their fastest start offensively. That's important because the Jazz play better when they get out the gate faster.
Watson, Bell/Burks, Miles, Jefferson, Kanter coming off the bench give the Jazz a bench that can score and play defense.
Whatever Bell brings to the first unit in defense, he's costing them more in sluggish starts. Hayward plays better from the 2 than the 3 and Howard is a quick attach threat from the 3. Favors will pass the ball out of the post (Sap won't--don't know why) and Hayward can get assists for Favors, Howard and Millsap. Harris, Howard and Hayward can and will run.
I've heard Phil Johnson say that the 2 and 3 are the same and it doesn't matter if Hayward is at the 2 or the 3, but the stats don't support it. The best scoring unit for the Jazz is the one I mentioned that should start. So moving Hayward to the 2 changes the dynamics of that group.
This was the lineup I liked coming out of training camp and still is after 8 regular season games. It's the lineup that's been the most productive, so I see Corbin's bias for Bell as a problem.
I think Bell has plenty to contribute but not as a starter. As a starter, his defensive contributions are diminished by the slow start the Jazz seem to have too often.
(I agree with Amish that starting Bell with limited minutes is at least rational and reasonable. I just have a bias toward optimal starting offense. If an opposing player is hot coming out of the box, we'll deal with it defensively and change lineups accordingly.)