The Jazz don't need a point guard for Harris
Moderators: Inigo Montoya, FJS
The Jazz don't need a point guard for Harris
- babyjax13
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,108
- And1: 17,608
- Joined: Jul 02, 2006
- Location: Fresno, eating Birria
-
The Jazz don't need a point guard for Harris
To me, and I think everyone else, it's becoming abundantly clear that point guard by committee is working for this team. Watson has been fantastic, and every time Tinsley gets minutes he looks competent. With all of the rumors circulating about Harris everyone seems to think that he will be moved for another point guard, I don't think that's the case at all. Our primary concern has to be getting expiring contracts, then we can worry about whether or not we add another point guard. Really, Harris doesn't seem to need to be traded, but I think that it would be in our best interests to find a deal that either got his salary off the books, or a good fitting piece to our team.

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.
JColl
Re: The Jazz don't need a point guard for Harris
- Wolverine
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,271
- And1: 119
- Joined: Jul 27, 2002
Re: The Jazz don't need a point guard for Harris
We need draft picks or young talent not expirings. We have not had much success luring free agents.
Re: The Jazz don't need a point guard for Harris
- babyjax13
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,108
- And1: 17,608
- Joined: Jul 02, 2006
- Location: Fresno, eating Birria
-
Re: The Jazz don't need a point guard for Harris
We won't get a pick for Harris unless we're willing to move him for a net-negative (like Luke Walton+filler+pick). An expiring is the best we can hope for.

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.
JColl
Re: The Jazz don't need a point guard for Harris
- QuantumMacgyver
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,453
- And1: 42
- Joined: Jul 07, 2008
Re: The Jazz don't need a point guard for Harris
I say play Harris at shooting guard. Speedy, can handle the ball, gets to the line, can hit the open shot, solid defender.... cant pass. Why is he even considered a point guard? Just play him at the 2 spot.
Re: The Jazz don't need a point guard for Harris
- BJSmiles
- Senior
- Posts: 694
- And1: 12
- Joined: Jan 14, 2012
Re: The Jazz don't need a point guard for Harris
QuantumMacgyver wrote:I say play Harris at shooting guard. Speedy, can handle the ball, gets to the line, can hit the open shot, solid defender.... cant pass. Why is he even considered a point guard? Just play him at the 2 spot.
Gordon and Alec are both going to be much better 2 guards than Harris.
Re: The Jazz don't need a point guard for Harris
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,294
- And1: 213
- Joined: Feb 07, 2010
Re: The Jazz don't need a point guard for Harris
QuantumMacgyver wrote:I say play Harris at shooting guard. Speedy, can handle the ball, gets to the line, can hit the open shot, solid defender.... cant pass. Why is he even considered a point guard? Just play him at the 2 spot.
Because he's 6'3 175 and would have his soul eaten by any SG with size.
Re: The Jazz don't need a point guard for Harris
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,414
- And1: 16
- Joined: Feb 03, 2006
Re: The Jazz don't need a point guard for Harris
Bjax is right. I'm not sure if I would mess with the mojo of what we are trying to do here. I like Watson with the 2nd unit. I would only move Harris if it was a clear net positive.
Re: The Jazz don't need a point guard for Harris
- CAE15
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,141
- And1: 699
- Joined: Jul 16, 2006
- Location: Udoka Azubuike Central
-
Re: The Jazz don't need a point guard for Harris
Trade harris and the gs pick for nash and something else. I'm usually aginst bringing in a old vet on a really young team. But nash actually makes sense the 2 or 3 years he could help this team develop the youngins and get them crazy confidence. Sure we lose the gs pick. But those years nash would give us would be invaluable in our player development.

Re: The Jazz don't need a point guard for Harris
- babyjax13
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,108
- And1: 17,608
- Joined: Jul 02, 2006
- Location: Fresno, eating Birria
-
Re: The Jazz don't need a point guard for Harris
ColdBlue wrote:Bjax is right. I'm not sure if I would mess with the mojo of what we are trying to do here. I like Watson with the 2nd unit. I would only move Harris if it was a clear net positive.
If we move him it should be next year, when he is expiring and has some value. I wouldn't complain if we were able to send him out for an expiring contract, though.

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.
JColl
Re: The Jazz don't need a point guard for Harris
- Wolverine
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,271
- And1: 119
- Joined: Jul 27, 2002
Re: The Jazz don't need a point guard for Harris
CAE15 wrote:Trade harris and the gs pick for nash and something else. I'm usually aginst bringing in a old vet on a really young team. But nash actually makes sense the 2 or 3 years he could help this team develop the youngins and get them crazy confidence. Sure we lose the gs pick. But those years nash would give us would be invaluable in our player development.
I was thinking along these lines too
Re: The Jazz don't need a point guard for Harris
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 829
- And1: 29
- Joined: Jan 28, 2010
Re: The Jazz don't need a point guard for Harris
Expiring and a 2nd round pick is fine by me
Re: The Jazz don't need a point guard for Harris
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,293
- And1: 4
- Joined: Jun 03, 2004
- Location: Italy
Re: The Jazz don't need a point guard for Harris
yeah, we don't need to trade the guy. But if Phoenix wants to sink the season.... nash for harris and cj + something?
NBA SINGS MORE JAZZ
Re: The Jazz don't need a point guard for Harris
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 179
- And1: 59
- Joined: Oct 27, 2010
-
Re: The Jazz don't need a point guard for Harris
And there is some talk of moving Nash as well. If they would take that trade I say yes but they may want too much for him.
Re: The Jazz don't need a point guard for Harris
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 1,736
- And1: 1,004
- Joined: Apr 02, 2011
Re: The Jazz don't need a point guard for Harris
CAE15 wrote:Trade harris and the gs pick for nash and something else. I'm usually aginst bringing in a old vet on a really young team. But nash actually makes sense the 2 or 3 years he could help this team develop the youngins and get them crazy confidence. Sure we lose the gs pick. But those years nash would give us would be invaluable in our player development.
Nash is expiring this year. So not only do we give up the GS pick, but he most likely makes us good enough to lose our own pick as well, just to rent him for half a year. I'd rather keep the two picks and address the PG situation in the offseason. In the meantime, we keep playing Harris and hope he can improve his value by March 15. You never know what we may be able to pry away from another team by then, who might be in need of a PG for a playoff push.
Re: The Jazz don't need a point guard for Harris
- CAE15
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,141
- And1: 699
- Joined: Jul 16, 2006
- Location: Udoka Azubuike Central
-
Re: The Jazz don't need a point guard for Harris
We ge nash to commit beforehand. No way do we give up thegs pick for a half a year
