PG Problem Harris, Watson, Tinsley
Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 11:06 pm
While I like Harris as a point guard in general, I think the team is less productive with him in several ways. I don't think he's a good fit with the group of younger players that we have with their style of basketball.
From a pure basketball perspective, I would like to see the Jazz trade Harris at the end of the season, resign Tinsley for a couple of years and draft a PG if the Jazz have a top 15 draft pick. If they have two draft picks in the top 15, I might go for a PG and a PF, and trade Millsap for an SF, letting Hayward share time at both the SF and SG.
Again from a pure basketball perspective I think the Jazz need a much more balanced offense that doesn't rely on pounding the ball into Al play after play. I think the mix I mentioned would give the Jazz that and more.
From a non-basketball perspective, I'm a little cautious on Tinsley. He's had a very long history of immature behavior. hanging around with the wrong guys and attracting trouble. He's also had weight problems, been inconsistent, been a black hole from time to time and when he tried to make a comeback with Memphis, he was terrible.
He hasn't played enough with the Jazz to know if he is completely passed his slump and whether the previous problems are going to return. He hasn't gotten into any serious legal issues off the court for 5 years, and there's less trouble to hang with in Utah. In the little time he's been on the court, he's played pretty well. He's a tough one to guess the future on.
The reason I like Tinsley is because the young guys play better with a point guard who doesn't look to drive frequently and who can pass. Tinsley is a pretty good passer.
I think Watson, Tinsley and really good rookie PG could get it done for the Jazz for one or two years until the rookie PG was the number one PG.
From a pure basketball perspective, I would like to see the Jazz trade Harris at the end of the season, resign Tinsley for a couple of years and draft a PG if the Jazz have a top 15 draft pick. If they have two draft picks in the top 15, I might go for a PG and a PF, and trade Millsap for an SF, letting Hayward share time at both the SF and SG.
Again from a pure basketball perspective I think the Jazz need a much more balanced offense that doesn't rely on pounding the ball into Al play after play. I think the mix I mentioned would give the Jazz that and more.
From a non-basketball perspective, I'm a little cautious on Tinsley. He's had a very long history of immature behavior. hanging around with the wrong guys and attracting trouble. He's also had weight problems, been inconsistent, been a black hole from time to time and when he tried to make a comeback with Memphis, he was terrible.
He hasn't played enough with the Jazz to know if he is completely passed his slump and whether the previous problems are going to return. He hasn't gotten into any serious legal issues off the court for 5 years, and there's less trouble to hang with in Utah. In the little time he's been on the court, he's played pretty well. He's a tough one to guess the future on.
The reason I like Tinsley is because the young guys play better with a point guard who doesn't look to drive frequently and who can pass. Tinsley is a pretty good passer.
I think Watson, Tinsley and really good rookie PG could get it done for the Jazz for one or two years until the rookie PG was the number one PG.