RealGM

The youngest of their three is compromised.
The Clippers have proven they own us.
The NBA has the Thunder's back.
It's time to try for some revenge on the Spurs.

why did you have to go and say that? c'mon man...

Well a Parker-Less Spurs team does sound tempting, but then they would have an asterick in all Texas textbooks.

Clippers sound like the easier team but they always beat us. I thought we whooped OKC, and Spurs game was 50/50.

The spurs are too well coached for my taste. They would wipe the floors with us. Id rather go up against OKC.

I would be interested in playing the Spurs if we had Favors and Kanter, but we all know that the league is gonna deem them ineligible for the playoffs for the second year straight.

I'd much, much rather play the Clippers or Thunder. I feel like we could steal a game from either of those teams, but I think the Spurs would sweep us again. They're just too disciplined and well-coached. Also, their pick and roll game will absolutely terrify me as long as we rely so heavily on Al. If we just gave Favors 10-15 of Al's minutes, our chances would improve significantly, but we all know that's not going to happen.

If the Spurs with no Duncan, Parker, Ginobili, Green, Leonard or Jackson can nearly beat the Heat, than I think the Spurs with no Parker would wipe the floor with the Jazz.

Shade8780 wrote:If the Spurs with no Duncan, Parker, Ginobili, Green, Leonard or Jackson can nearly beat the Heat, than I think the Spurs with no Parker would wipe the floor with the Jazz.

Oh, good point. I bet if they play the Heat in the finals that they'll sit Duncan, Parker, Ginobili, Green, Leonard, and Jackson. They'll have a better chance that way according to your single game sample size.