Page 1 of 4

JAZZ @ WARRIORS

Posted: Mon Apr 8, 2013 12:00 am
by seejaydeja
a win tonight would be really really cool.

Re: JAZZ @ WARRIORS

Posted: Mon Apr 8, 2013 12:06 am
by seejaydeja
no burks tonight
:\

Re: JAZZ @ WARRIORS

Posted: Mon Apr 8, 2013 12:09 am
by Matt007b
huge game here.. hope mo brings his passing game and stays under control..

Re: JAZZ @ WARRIORS

Posted: Mon Apr 8, 2013 12:09 am
by Inigo Montoya
no The Murp tonight as well.

the lakers lost. if we win we are back at 8th.

Re: JAZZ @ WARRIORS

Posted: Mon Apr 8, 2013 12:32 am
by seejaydeja
tins did it dirty right there

Re: JAZZ @ WARRIORS

Posted: Mon Apr 8, 2013 12:33 am
by Inigo Montoya
Tinsanity!

Re: JAZZ @ WARRIORS

Posted: Mon Apr 8, 2013 12:34 am
by RyanStorm
We are in 8th since we win tie breaker...all we have to do is tie lakers to go to playoffs....I have the worst feeling in my gut that we lose 1 more game than Lakers and get like 42-40 and they get 43-39....

Golden State needs to win tonight to be considered playoff berth, with a lose tonight they are still open for losing playoff position.

Everyone is fighting right now, and were part of the group who lingered to long, and now have the final games decide our fates, which is never good to begin with.

Re: JAZZ @ WARRIORS

Posted: Mon Apr 8, 2013 12:42 am
by seejaydeja
currys shot is ridiculous

Re: JAZZ @ WARRIORS

Posted: Mon Apr 8, 2013 12:48 am
by seejaydeja
Foye on Curry? Waiving the white flag so soon...

Re: JAZZ @ WARRIORS

Posted: Mon Apr 8, 2013 12:52 am
by Inigo Montoya
fun game to watch. very entertaining. and favors is showing some moves.

Re: JAZZ @ WARRIORS

Posted: Mon Apr 8, 2013 12:55 am
by RyanStorm
We need to learn how to "not" be come back kids...Cause if we stop getting so behind we wouldn't need to catch up...

GSW is surprisingly a great team this year considering they were the clippers of the league last season.

Is it just me or have we gone nowhere since 1 year ago? I don't feel like we have gotten any better as a team...were the same old team who got 8th and was the only playoff team who probably wasn't "a playoff" team.

Re: JAZZ @ WARRIORS

Posted: Mon Apr 8, 2013 12:59 am
by seejaydeja
of course...can't escape the half without someone doing something dumb

Re: JAZZ @ WARRIORS

Posted: Mon Apr 8, 2013 1:00 am
by Inigo Montoya
damn foye, that was one bad foul.

Re: JAZZ @ WARRIORS

Posted: Mon Apr 8, 2013 1:01 am
by StocktonShorts
Randy's just tying to get his offense going by ratcheting up his defensive intensity.

Re: JAZZ @ WARRIORS

Posted: Mon Apr 8, 2013 1:04 am
by Blackie
Right now we are on our way to the playoffs. If we win we will have a slight advantage. Lose and you know what. We are playing good team basketball. Curry is awesum. Stop Curry.

Re: JAZZ @ WARRIORS

Posted: Mon Apr 8, 2013 1:08 am
by StocktonShorts
seejaydeja wrote:of course...can't escape the half without someone doing something dumb


You could say we consistently do dumb stuff.

Re: JAZZ @ WARRIORS

Posted: Mon Apr 8, 2013 1:10 am
by DiscoLives4ever
It irritates me that Foye can jump towards empty airspace, then get the foul because Landry moved under him AFTER Foye was in the air.

Re: JAZZ @ WARRIORS

Posted: Mon Apr 8, 2013 1:13 am
by StocktonShorts
DiscoLives4ever wrote:It irritates me that Foye can jump towards empty airspace, then get the foul because Landry moved under him AFTER Foye was in the air.


It irritates me that Foye thought it was a good idea to contest Carl Landry's desperation three at the buzzer.

Re: JAZZ @ WARRIORS

Posted: Mon Apr 8, 2013 1:16 am
by DiscoLives4ever
StocktonShorts wrote:
DiscoLives4ever wrote:It irritates me that Foye can jump towards empty airspace, then get the foul because Landry moved under him AFTER Foye was in the air.


It irritates me that Foye thought it was a good idea to contest Carl Landry's desperation three at the buzzer.


I don't have a problem with it, considering it was a straight-away look with enough time to set and shoot.

Re: JAZZ @ WARRIORS

Posted: Mon Apr 8, 2013 1:16 am
by StocktonShorts
DiscoLives4ever wrote:
StocktonShorts wrote:
DiscoLives4ever wrote:It irritates me that Foye can jump towards empty airspace, then get the foul because Landry moved under him AFTER Foye was in the air.


It irritates me that Foye thought it was a good idea to contest Carl Landry's desperation three at the buzzer.


I don't have a problem with it, considering it was a straight-away look with enough time to set and shoot.


But it was Carl Landry. He's 2 of 16 in his career from three.