Trade between Utah and GS agreed on

Moderators: Inigo Montoya, FJS

Jazzy Cougar
Banned User
Posts: 79
And1: 3
Joined: Jul 05, 2013

Trade between Utah and GS agreed on 

Post#1 » by Jazzy Cougar » Fri Jul 5, 2013 7:58 pm

@daldridgetnt: Source says the Warriors are sending Andris Biedrins, Richard Jefferson to the Jazz. Checking on what they're getting back.
User avatar
Inigo Montoya
Forum Mod - Jazz
Forum Mod - Jazz
Posts: 17,043
And1: 8,319
Joined: May 31, 2012

Re: Trade between Utah and GS agreed on 

Post#2 » by Inigo Montoya » Fri Jul 5, 2013 8:00 pm

[tweet]https://twitter.com/WojYahooNBA/status/353240237759143938[/tweet]

[tweet]https://twitter.com/WojYahooNBA/status/353241772052324352[/tweet]
Draft Nate Wolters - FAILED
Keep Nate Wolters - FAILED
Image
KqWIN wrote:Why are we talking about Middleton, Harris, and Porter?

The real decision the Jazz FO is making is between Continuity, Cap Flexibility, and Cash Considerations.
User avatar
spoonhoops
Pro Prospect
Posts: 760
And1: 8
Joined: Apr 02, 2010

Re: Trade between Utah and GS agreed on 

Post#3 » by spoonhoops » Fri Jul 5, 2013 8:00 pm

Iggy going to GS for 4/48
Jazz_Man_86 on Favors:

"He is not Dwight Howard. He's max is 20 + 13 + 2 = is this a supers tats? No."

Dwight 2011-2012 - 20.6 Points - 14.5 Rebounds - 2.1 Blocks
User avatar
spoonhoops
Pro Prospect
Posts: 760
And1: 8
Joined: Apr 02, 2010

Re: Trade between Utah and GS agreed on 

Post#4 » by spoonhoops » Fri Jul 5, 2013 8:01 pm

We have to be getting Barnes.
Jazz_Man_86 on Favors:

"He is not Dwight Howard. He's max is 20 + 13 + 2 = is this a supers tats? No."

Dwight 2011-2012 - 20.6 Points - 14.5 Rebounds - 2.1 Blocks
Yi Jian Lian
Veteran
Posts: 2,738
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 18, 2007

Re: Trade between Utah and GS agreed on 

Post#5 » by Yi Jian Lian » Fri Jul 5, 2013 8:04 pm

Utah definitely not getting Barnes. lol, maybe the lakers
BigAlymphoma
Banned User
Posts: 473
And1: 218
Joined: Nov 13, 2012

Re: Trade between Utah and GS agreed on 

Post#6 » by BigAlymphoma » Fri Jul 5, 2013 8:04 pm

It's a salary dump. We're getting expirings for essentially nothing.

W/e.
JazzFan32
Sophomore
Posts: 125
And1: 7
Joined: Jul 06, 2012

Re: Trade between Utah and GS agreed on 

Post#7 » by JazzFan32 » Fri Jul 5, 2013 8:04 pm

There better be more the Jazz are getting back, otherwise this is stupid deal. :x
User avatar
d-will8
Pro Prospect
Posts: 923
And1: 8
Joined: Oct 07, 2006

Re: Trade between Utah and GS agreed on 

Post#8 » by d-will8 » Fri Jul 5, 2013 8:05 pm

Why are making a deal for two veteran scrubs that allows a future conference rival to sign Iguodala? We better be getting something else too. Otherwise this makes zero sense.
User avatar
The59Sound
Head Coach
Posts: 6,363
And1: 917
Joined: Jul 01, 2010
   

Re: Trade between Utah and GS agreed on 

Post#9 » by The59Sound » Fri Jul 5, 2013 8:07 pm

We're obviously getting something else in return... but if it's just one first round pick, I'll be pretty disappointed.
R-DAWG wrote:Look guys, no matter what happens we know Fegan is a man of his word and Dwight Howard doesn't change his mind once he makes a decision.

The Quantifiable Connection: An Interstellar fan site.
http://www.quantifiableconnection.com
User avatar
Inigo Montoya
Forum Mod - Jazz
Forum Mod - Jazz
Posts: 17,043
And1: 8,319
Joined: May 31, 2012

Re: Trade between Utah and GS agreed on 

Post#10 » by Inigo Montoya » Fri Jul 5, 2013 8:07 pm

[tweet]https://twitter.com/WojYahooNBA/status/353243106805690371[/tweet]
Draft Nate Wolters - FAILED
Keep Nate Wolters - FAILED
Image
KqWIN wrote:Why are we talking about Middleton, Harris, and Porter?

The real decision the Jazz FO is making is between Continuity, Cap Flexibility, and Cash Considerations.
User avatar
spoonhoops
Pro Prospect
Posts: 760
And1: 8
Joined: Apr 02, 2010

Re: Trade between Utah and GS agreed on 

Post#11 » by spoonhoops » Fri Jul 5, 2013 8:08 pm

No way Barnes goes to Lakers
Jazz_Man_86 on Favors:

"He is not Dwight Howard. He's max is 20 + 13 + 2 = is this a supers tats? No."

Dwight 2011-2012 - 20.6 Points - 14.5 Rebounds - 2.1 Blocks
pickIBL
Head Coach
Posts: 6,506
And1: 959
Joined: Aug 12, 2008

Re: Trade between Utah and GS agreed on 

Post#12 » by pickIBL » Fri Jul 5, 2013 8:08 pm

some type of compensation has to be coming back. the trade just broke.
I like my prospects the same way I like my women... foreign- pickIBL
User avatar
Jazzfan154
Sophomore
Posts: 154
And1: 49
Joined: Jun 23, 2013
   

Re: Trade between Utah and GS agreed on 

Post#13 » by Jazzfan154 » Fri Jul 5, 2013 8:10 pm

We better get Barnes.
User avatar
Inigo Montoya
Forum Mod - Jazz
Forum Mod - Jazz
Posts: 17,043
And1: 8,319
Joined: May 31, 2012

Re: Trade between Utah and GS agreed on 

Post#14 » by Inigo Montoya » Fri Jul 5, 2013 8:11 pm

d-will8 wrote:Why are making a deal for two veteran scrubs that allows a future conference rival to sign Iguodala? We better be getting something else too. Otherwise this makes zero sense.


that's actually good.
1.they are vets who can show the young guys the ropes.
2. they are scrubs, so they won't start over our young players and accept a role off the bench.
3. they are both expiring contracts, so they'll free up 20M of cap space at the end of the year.
4. the jazz got role players without committing to long term salaries and didn't give away stupid contracts.
5. we must be getting something of value as well. TBD what this is.
6. now that the GSW signed iggy, it is possible barnes will be moved. and since the GSW pulled out of the D12 race, we might be the ones getting barnes.
Draft Nate Wolters - FAILED
Keep Nate Wolters - FAILED
Image
KqWIN wrote:Why are we talking about Middleton, Harris, and Porter?

The real decision the Jazz FO is making is between Continuity, Cap Flexibility, and Cash Considerations.
Jazzy Cougar
Banned User
Posts: 79
And1: 3
Joined: Jul 05, 2013

Re: Trade between Utah and GS agreed on 

Post#15 » by Jazzy Cougar » Fri Jul 5, 2013 8:11 pm

Warriors not pursuing Howard anymore, also I think Barnes or Klay is going to Utah, they still don't have enough for Iggy with Biedrins and Jefferson gone
User avatar
The59Sound
Head Coach
Posts: 6,363
And1: 917
Joined: Jul 01, 2010
   

Re: Trade between Utah and GS agreed on 

Post#16 » by The59Sound » Fri Jul 5, 2013 8:13 pm

Inigo Montoya wrote:
d-will8 wrote:Why are making a deal for two veteran scrubs that allows a future conference rival to sign Iguodala? We better be getting something else too. Otherwise this makes zero sense.


that's actually good.
1.they are vets who can show the young guys the ropes.
2. they are scrubs, so they won't start over our young players and accept a role off the bench.
3. they are both expiring contracts, so they'll free up 20M of cap space at the end of the year.
4. the jazz got role players without committing to long term salaries and didn't give away stupid contracts.
5. we must be getting something of value as well. TBD what this is.
6. now that the GSW signed iggy, it is possible barnes will be moved. and since the GSW pulled out of the D12 race, we might be the ones getting barnes.


This all makes good sense to me.
R-DAWG wrote:Look guys, no matter what happens we know Fegan is a man of his word and Dwight Howard doesn't change his mind once he makes a decision.

The Quantifiable Connection: An Interstellar fan site.
http://www.quantifiableconnection.com
User avatar
spoonhoops
Pro Prospect
Posts: 760
And1: 8
Joined: Apr 02, 2010

Re: Trade between Utah and GS agreed on 

Post#17 » by spoonhoops » Fri Jul 5, 2013 8:17 pm

The59Sound wrote:
Inigo Montoya wrote:
d-will8 wrote:Why are making a deal for two veteran scrubs that allows a future conference rival to sign Iguodala? We better be getting something else too. Otherwise this makes zero sense.


that's actually good.
1.they are vets who can show the young guys the ropes.
2. they are scrubs, so they won't start over our young players and accept a role off the bench.
3. they are both expiring contracts, so they'll free up 20M of cap space at the end of the year.
4. the jazz got role players without committing to long term salaries and didn't give away stupid contracts.
5. we must be getting something of value as well. TBD what this is.
6. now that the GSW signed iggy, it is possible barnes will be moved. and since the GSW pulled out of the D12 race, we might be the ones getting barnes.


This all makes good sense to me.


This is also why we don't want Bogut. Look, I really like Bogut and think he could do well with the Jazz, but we don't need an extra 5 wins next season because of Bogut. If we exceed expectations next year I want it to be because of our core group.
Jazz_Man_86 on Favors:

"He is not Dwight Howard. He's max is 20 + 13 + 2 = is this a supers tats? No."

Dwight 2011-2012 - 20.6 Points - 14.5 Rebounds - 2.1 Blocks
User avatar
d-will8
Pro Prospect
Posts: 923
And1: 8
Joined: Oct 07, 2006

Re: Trade between Utah and GS agreed on 

Post#18 » by d-will8 » Fri Jul 5, 2013 8:17 pm

Inigo Montoya wrote:
d-will8 wrote:Why are making a deal for two veteran scrubs that allows a future conference rival to sign Iguodala? We better be getting something else too. Otherwise this makes zero sense.


that's actually good.
1.they are vets who can show the young guys the ropes.
2. they are scrubs, so they won't start over our young players and accept a role off the bench.
3. they are both expiring contracts, so they'll free up 20M of cap space at the end of the year.
4. the jazz got role players without committing to long term salaries and didn't give away stupid contracts.
5. we must be getting something of value as well. TBD what this is.
6. now that the GSW signed iggy, it is possible barnes will be moved. and since the GSW pulled out of the D12 race, we might be the ones getting barnes.


I agree with some of what you're saying, but I think it's yet to be determined whether this move is good. I agree that it could be good to have some vets who can show the young guys the ropes. I do not agree, however, that the fact that RJ and Biedrins are scrubs necessarily means they won't start over young players. The sting from memories of Josh Howard, Raja Bell, Randy Foye, etc. is still too fresh for me to believe that. Also, considering we would have had the 20M in cap space regardless of whether we made this trade, I don't think that really makes this a good trade.

I won't hate this trade if we get something else in return, but, unless that something is Barnes or Thompson (and I don't think it will be), I won't love or even like the trade either. It just doesn't add much to or team. Sure, we get some vets, but we could get better vets for a lot cheaper.
User avatar
Inigo Montoya
Forum Mod - Jazz
Forum Mod - Jazz
Posts: 17,043
And1: 8,319
Joined: May 31, 2012

Re: Trade between Utah and GS agreed on 

Post#19 » by Inigo Montoya » Fri Jul 5, 2013 8:18 pm

spoonhoops wrote:This is also why we don't want Bogut. Look, I really like Bogut and think he could do well with the Jazz, but we don't need an extra 5 wins next season because of Bogut. If we exceed expectations next year I want it to be because of our core group.


well, he does get injured. a lot. and he might come off the bench. so he may not give you 5 extra wins.
Draft Nate Wolters - FAILED
Keep Nate Wolters - FAILED
Image
KqWIN wrote:Why are we talking about Middleton, Harris, and Porter?

The real decision the Jazz FO is making is between Continuity, Cap Flexibility, and Cash Considerations.
User avatar
d-will8
Pro Prospect
Posts: 923
And1: 8
Joined: Oct 07, 2006

Re: Trade between Utah and GS agreed on 

Post#20 » by d-will8 » Fri Jul 5, 2013 8:19 pm

But, having said all of that, I should wait to see what else we're getting before criticizing the trade. My tune might change.

Return to Utah Jazz