Donovan Mitchell Thread

Moderators: FJS, Inigo Montoya

Catchall
RealGM
Posts: 19,450
And1: 10,254
Joined: Jul 06, 2008
     

Re: Donovan Mitchell Thread 

Post#181 » by Catchall » Tue Aug 22, 2017 8:35 pm

I think he'll be able to guard most of the 2s in the league. A long, athletic guy like DeRozan or Butler may be able to work him in the mid-range, but I think defensively Mitchell has enough versatility that it will help him get more floor time. He may not be a lead guard, but he'll be good as a secondary creator and he can shoot well enough to space the floor. He may take some minutes from Ingles and Sefalosha at the wing, as it gives the Jazz more athleticism and some intangibles.
He/Him, Dude, Bro, Bruh
SoCalJazzFan
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,319
And1: 1,023
Joined: Jul 29, 2009

Re: Donovan Mitchell Thread 

Post#182 » by SoCalJazzFan » Tue Aug 22, 2017 8:55 pm

Catchall wrote:I think he'll be able to guard most of the 2s in the league. A long, athletic guy like DeRozan or Butler may be able to work him in the mid-range, but I think defensively Mitchell has enough versatility that it will help him get more floor time. He may not be a lead guard, but he'll be good as a secondary creator and he can shoot well enough to space the floor. He may take some minutes from Ingles and Sefalosha at the wing, as it gives the Jazz more athleticism and some intangibles.

I am concerned about how well he can guard bigger players, particularly where 6'8" SGs are starting to become more common. However, I think that either the Jazz will pair him with a tall PG (Rubio/Exum) and let them both play as guards, switching as necessary, or that DM becomes the lead PG (let's be honest with ourselves, he is looking more like a PG than Exum at this point). Either way, I find this kid exciting.
dr0welf
Analyst
Posts: 3,725
And1: 775
Joined: Jun 16, 2007
     

Re: Donovan Mitchell Thread 

Post#183 » by dr0welf » Thu Aug 24, 2017 1:15 pm

Last year we had Jingles as our defensive stopper. Spida seems to pride himself on defense, I think he will be fine on most guards. If for some reason someones height is causing issues we still have Jingles.
User avatar
stitches
RealGM
Posts: 14,412
And1: 6,811
Joined: Jul 14, 2014
 

Re: Donovan Mitchell Thread 

Post#184 » by stitches » Thu Aug 24, 2017 2:05 pm

AingesBurner
RealGM
Posts: 14,760
And1: 3,738
Joined: Jan 18, 2013
   

Re: Donovan Mitchell Thread 

Post#185 » by AingesBurner » Thu Aug 24, 2017 3:20 pm

DM is the most lauded rookie we've had since DWill, I am excited about this guy.
Ingles is cooked.
Daddy 801
General Manager
Posts: 7,693
And1: 2,436
Joined: May 14, 2013
 

Re: Donovan Mitchell Thread 

Post#186 » by Daddy 801 » Thu Aug 24, 2017 6:48 pm

I love Donovan. He was the player I wanted the most and we got him. His answers are so honest and on point. Love his work ethic and drive. It's cool to see him want to play with someone like Rudy.
User avatar
Luigi
General Manager
Posts: 8,027
And1: 3,590
Joined: Aug 13, 2009
 

Re: Donovan Mitchell Thread 

Post#187 » by Luigi » Thu Aug 24, 2017 8:52 pm

Catchall wrote:I think he'll be able to guard most of the 2s in the league. A long, athletic guy like DeRozan or Butler may be able to work him in the mid-range, but I think defensively Mitchell has enough versatility that it will help him get more floor time. He may not be a lead guard, but he'll be good as a secondary creator and he can shoot well enough to space the floor. He may take some minutes from Ingles and Sefalosha at the wing, as it gives the Jazz more athleticism and some intangibles.


Mitchel has a big length disadvantage against most 2s. He has the weight for it already, but I think he'll be better using that against other 1s that can't just shoot over him. It's nice that he could switch onto them though.

Player--No Shoes--Standing Reach--Weight
Mitchell -- 6'1.75 -- 8'1.00 -- 211

Average Dimensions Drafted into the NBA:
Position--No Shoes--Standing Reach--Weight
PG -- 6'1.25 -- 8'1.50 -- 185
SG -- 6'4.00 -- 8'4.75 -- 198
SF -- 6'6.75 -- 8'8.50 -- 215
PF -- 6'8.25 -- 8'11.50 -- 229
C -- 6'10.50 -- 9'2.25 -- 245
In '03-'04, Jerry Sloan coached the ESPN predicted "worst team of all time" to 42-40.
User avatar
stitches
RealGM
Posts: 14,412
And1: 6,811
Joined: Jul 14, 2014
 

Re: Donovan Mitchell Thread 

Post#188 » by stitches » Mon Aug 28, 2017 5:38 pm

CP3 hosting summer workouts for some rookies. Donovan was there, along with Malik Monk, Harry Giles, Elfrid Payton:



I love it that he's working out with some of the best in the league.
User avatar
stitches
RealGM
Posts: 14,412
And1: 6,811
Joined: Jul 14, 2014
 

Re: Donovan Mitchell Thread 

Post#189 » by stitches » Mon Aug 28, 2017 6:04 pm

Also, here's more from Mitchell playing with Carmelo, JR Smith and others:
sipclip
Head Coach
Posts: 6,859
And1: 1,240
Joined: Jan 20, 2005

Re: Donovan Mitchell Thread 

Post#190 » by sipclip » Mon Aug 28, 2017 7:01 pm

I have a feeling that Mitchell is going to end up being one of those players that players from around the league will want to come here to play with. Between he and Rudy they could turn into quite the recruiting tool.
WinterSoldier
Junior
Posts: 444
And1: 185
Joined: Mar 28, 2015

Re: Donovan Mitchell Thread 

Post#191 » by WinterSoldier » Mon Aug 28, 2017 7:44 pm

Luigi wrote:
Catchall wrote:I think he'll be able to guard most of the 2s in the league. A long, athletic guy like DeRozan or Butler may be able to work him in the mid-range, but I think defensively Mitchell has enough versatility that it will help him get more floor time. He may not be a lead guard, but he'll be good as a secondary creator and he can shoot well enough to space the floor. He may take some minutes from Ingles and Sefalosha at the wing, as it gives the Jazz more athleticism and some intangibles.


Mitchel has a big length disadvantage against most 2s. He has the weight for it already, but I think he'll be better using that against other 1s that can't just shoot over him. It's nice that he could switch onto them though.

Player--No Shoes--Standing Reach--Weight
Mitchell -- 6'1.75 -- 8'1.00 -- 211

Average Dimensions Drafted into the NBA:
Position--No Shoes--Standing Reach--Weight
PG -- 6'1.25 -- 8'1.50 -- 185
SG -- 6'4.00 -- 8'4.75 -- 198
SF -- 6'6.75 -- 8'8.50 -- 215
PF -- 6'8.25 -- 8'11.50 -- 229
C -- 6'10.50 -- 9'2.25 -- 245


The 8'1" standing reach isn't accurate, he measured 8'4" standing reach on several previous occasions. He purposely measured low at the NBA combine to make his vertical look better.
User avatar
Luigi
General Manager
Posts: 8,027
And1: 3,590
Joined: Aug 13, 2009
 

Re: Donovan Mitchell Thread 

Post#192 » by Luigi » Mon Aug 28, 2017 9:57 pm

WinterSoldier wrote:
Luigi wrote:
Catchall wrote:I think he'll be able to guard most of the 2s in the league. A long, athletic guy like DeRozan or Butler may be able to work him in the mid-range, but I think defensively Mitchell has enough versatility that it will help him get more floor time. He may not be a lead guard, but he'll be good as a secondary creator and he can shoot well enough to space the floor. He may take some minutes from Ingles and Sefalosha at the wing, as it gives the Jazz more athleticism and some intangibles.


Mitchel has a big length disadvantage against most 2s. He has the weight for it already, but I think he'll be better using that against other 1s that can't just shoot over him. It's nice that he could switch onto them though.

Player--No Shoes--Standing Reach--Weight
Mitchell -- 6'1.75 -- 8'1.00 -- 211

Average Dimensions Drafted into the NBA:
Position--No Shoes--Standing Reach--Weight
PG -- 6'1.25 -- 8'1.50 -- 185
SG -- 6'4.00 -- 8'4.75 -- 198
SF -- 6'6.75 -- 8'8.50 -- 215
PF -- 6'8.25 -- 8'11.50 -- 229
C -- 6'10.50 -- 9'2.25 -- 245


The 8'1" standing reach isn't accurate, he measured 8'4" standing reach on several previous occasions. He purposely measured low at the NBA combine to make his vertical look better.


That would be good news. Do you have a source? The draftexpress page is only showing his combine numbers, and they are pretty good about collecting past measurements.

Shrugging on the reach to get the vert definitely happens. But it surprises me that people care more about vert than they do about reach. Good defense is often on the ground. But yeah, link?
In '03-'04, Jerry Sloan coached the ESPN predicted "worst team of all time" to 42-40.
Winglish
Analyst
Posts: 3,634
And1: 1,302
Joined: Feb 17, 2013
     

Re: RE: Re: Donovan Mitchell Thread 

Post#193 » by Winglish » Mon Aug 28, 2017 10:40 pm

Luigi wrote:
Catchall wrote:I think he'll be able to guard most of the 2s in the league. A long, athletic guy like DeRozan or Butler may be able to work him in the mid-range, but I think defensively Mitchell has enough versatility that it will help him get more floor time. He may not be a lead guard, but he'll be good as a secondary creator and he can shoot well enough to space the floor. He may take some minutes from Ingles and Sefalosha at the wing, as it gives the Jazz more athleticism and some intangibles.


Mitchel has a big length disadvantage against most 2s. He has the weight for it already, but I think he'll be better using that against other 1s that can't just shoot over him. It's nice that he could switch onto them though.

Player--No Shoes--Standing Reach--Weight
Mitchell -- 6'1.75 -- 8'1.00 -- 211

Average Dimensions Drafted into the NBA:
Position--No Shoes--Standing Reach--Weight
PG -- 6'1.25 -- 8'1.50 -- 185
SG -- 6'4.00 -- 8'4.75 -- 198
SF -- 6'6.75 -- 8'8.50 -- 215
PF -- 6'8.25 -- 8'11.50 -- 229
C -- 6'10.50 -- 9'2.25 -- 245

What about Mitchell playing SG on offense and guarding PG's while a taller poimt guard runs the point and defends the SG's?

Anyone know where the team might find a really tall point guard who can defend the shooting guard position?

Sent from my SM-G930T using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
Luigi
General Manager
Posts: 8,027
And1: 3,590
Joined: Aug 13, 2009
 

Re: RE: Re: Donovan Mitchell Thread 

Post#194 » by Luigi » Mon Aug 28, 2017 10:52 pm

Winglish wrote:
Luigi wrote:
Catchall wrote:I think he'll be able to guard most of the 2s in the league. A long, athletic guy like DeRozan or Butler may be able to work him in the mid-range, but I think defensively Mitchell has enough versatility that it will help him get more floor time. He may not be a lead guard, but he'll be good as a secondary creator and he can shoot well enough to space the floor. He may take some minutes from Ingles and Sefalosha at the wing, as it gives the Jazz more athleticism and some intangibles.


Mitchel has a big length disadvantage against most 2s. He has the weight for it already, but I think he'll be better using that against other 1s that can't just shoot over him. It's nice that he could switch onto them though.

Player--No Shoes--Standing Reach--Weight
Mitchell -- 6'1.75 -- 8'1.00 -- 211

Average Dimensions Drafted into the NBA:
Position--No Shoes--Standing Reach--Weight
PG -- 6'1.25 -- 8'1.50 -- 185
SG -- 6'4.00 -- 8'4.75 -- 198
SF -- 6'6.75 -- 8'8.50 -- 215
PF -- 6'8.25 -- 8'11.50 -- 229
C -- 6'10.50 -- 9'2.25 -- 245

What about Mitchell playing SG on offense and guarding PG's while a taller poimt guard runs the point and defends the SG's?

Anyone know where the team might find a really tall point guard who can defend the shooting guard position?

Sent from my SM-G930T using RealGM mobile app


I define positions by size more than anything. If Mitchell wants to play off the ball on offense, that's fine. 1s don't have to have point duties. If Exum decides to play like a man this year, maybe it would work.

Most of the talk here has been about Mitchell guarding 2s and 3s. I think he should stick to guarding 1s unless he gets in a pnr situation he cant get around.
In '03-'04, Jerry Sloan coached the ESPN predicted "worst team of all time" to 42-40.
WinterSoldier
Junior
Posts: 444
And1: 185
Joined: Mar 28, 2015

Re: Donovan Mitchell Thread 

Post#195 » by WinterSoldier » Tue Aug 29, 2017 12:40 am

Luigi wrote:
WinterSoldier wrote:
Luigi wrote:
Mitchel has a big length disadvantage against most 2s. He has the weight for it already, but I think he'll be better using that against other 1s that can't just shoot over him. It's nice that he could switch onto them though.

Player--No Shoes--Standing Reach--Weight
Mitchell -- 6'1.75 -- 8'1.00 -- 211

Average Dimensions Drafted into the NBA:
Position--No Shoes--Standing Reach--Weight
PG -- 6'1.25 -- 8'1.50 -- 185
SG -- 6'4.00 -- 8'4.75 -- 198
SF -- 6'6.75 -- 8'8.50 -- 215
PF -- 6'8.25 -- 8'11.50 -- 229
C -- 6'10.50 -- 9'2.25 -- 245


The 8'1" standing reach isn't accurate, he measured 8'4" standing reach on several previous occasions. He purposely measured low at the NBA combine to make his vertical look better.


That would be good news. Do you have a source? The draftexpress page is only showing his combine numbers, and they are pretty good about collecting past measurements.

Shrugging on the reach to get the vert definitely happens. But it surprises me that people care more about vert than they do about reach. Good defense is often on the ground. But yeah, link?


http://www.nbadraft.net/2017-extended-mock-draft-40
He's # 28 in this mock but you can read he has a 8'4 standing reach. He was measured in Adida's Nation and the Derby Classic both times he had 8'4 standing reach. I can't find those measurements but the mock draft people obivously knew about the measurements.
User avatar
Luigi
General Manager
Posts: 8,027
And1: 3,590
Joined: Aug 13, 2009
 

Re: Donovan Mitchell Thread 

Post#196 » by Luigi » Tue Aug 29, 2017 5:40 am

WinterSoldier wrote:
Luigi wrote:
WinterSoldier wrote:
The 8'1" standing reach isn't accurate, he measured 8'4" standing reach on several previous occasions. He purposely measured low at the NBA combine to make his vertical look better.


That would be good news. Do you have a source? The draftexpress page is only showing his combine numbers, and they are pretty good about collecting past measurements.

Shrugging on the reach to get the vert definitely happens. But it surprises me that people care more about vert than they do about reach. Good defense is often on the ground. But yeah, link?


http://www.nbadraft.net/2017-extended-mock-draft-40
He's # 28 in this mock but you can read he has a 8'4 standing reach. He was measured in Adida's Nation and the Derby Classic both times he had 8'4 standing reach. I can't find those measurements but the mock draft people obivously knew about the measurements.


This is promising. I wonder what happened to the adidas and derby measurements.
In '03-'04, Jerry Sloan coached the ESPN predicted "worst team of all time" to 42-40.
Catchall
RealGM
Posts: 19,450
And1: 10,254
Joined: Jul 06, 2008
     

Re: Donovan Mitchell Thread 

Post#197 » by Catchall » Tue Aug 29, 2017 6:39 pm

The more I watch him play in these pick-up games, the more I think Mitchell can ultimately replace George Hill at the 1. His athleticism and offensive versatility become more of an advantage against PGs. He can wrap up most 1s defensively and bully them offensively. He can elevate anytime he wants and get a good look. Next to Hood at the 2, the Jazz would have two potential 20-point scorers in the backcourt and have good length at both positions.

I understand if Rubio is a wizard running the pick-and-roll with Gobert, or if Exum can keep improving his Tony Parker impersonation, but it's nice to have the option to play Mitchell on the ball.
He/Him, Dude, Bro, Bruh
Paper Face
Pro Prospect
Posts: 781
And1: 101
Joined: Jun 19, 2009
 

Re: Donovan Mitchell Thread 

Post#198 » by Paper Face » Tue Aug 29, 2017 7:04 pm

Catchall wrote:I understand if Rubio is a wizard running the pick-and-roll with Gobert, or if Exum can keep improving his Tony Parker impersonation, but it's nice to have the option to play Mitchell on the ball.


It's not the worst problem in the world. It's not like having two quarterbacks. Quinn can rotate Mitchell, Rubio, and Exum at the 1 & 2 spots to great effect according to who we play, and play Hood/Thabo at the 3. Advanced stats place a lot of Ingles best minutes at the 4, so he can effectively play there. Favors and Gobert complete that 8-man playoff rotation.

If I'm Quinn, and Mitchell is the type of defensive attacker that he appears to be, then I think you are right. Send him out there to cover the 1. But I think there are a lot of 2s that he will be effective against also.
sipclip - "Even though I love what I have seen from Mitchell if you were to ask anyone if they would rather have Booker and the 24th pick or Mitchell they would all take Booker and the pick."
Catchall
RealGM
Posts: 19,450
And1: 10,254
Joined: Jul 06, 2008
     

Re: Donovan Mitchell Thread 

Post#199 » by Catchall » Tue Aug 29, 2017 7:38 pm

stitches wrote:Also, here's more from Mitchell playing with Carmelo, JR Smith and others:
He/Him, Dude, Bro, Bruh
User avatar
Luigi
General Manager
Posts: 8,027
And1: 3,590
Joined: Aug 13, 2009
 

Re: Donovan Mitchell Thread 

Post#200 » by Luigi » Tue Aug 29, 2017 9:07 pm

We need to see him in an actual NBA game before we get too high on this kid. He's gonna disappoint if we keep getting ahead of ourselves.
In '03-'04, Jerry Sloan coached the ESPN predicted "worst team of all time" to 42-40.

Return to Utah Jazz