BudTugly wrote:stitches wrote:Inigo Montoya wrote:I wouldn't be surprised if we just trudge with mediocre teams until the lottery reform goes into effect, and then continue to churn out mediocre teams because they could sell the fanbase that with the rule changes there is no reason not to do it.
The thing that bothers me to no end is that we had the best scenario and case to do a targeted one year tank. We just lost our 2 best offensive players and had a rookie with ton of potential and a star entering the first year of a 4 year contract. This is the absolute perfect moment for a targeted tank - while we had 4 years on Gobert's contract. We had enough time to get the future offensive superstar, develop him and get him to a place where playing with him and possibly Mitchell(if he pans out) would be enticing enough for Gobert to resign when the time comes.
I don’t mean to be rotten but what should bother all of us is what the Jazz did with the great wealth of picks they had. I’m excited about Mitchell and Gobert. These dudes are legit. I don’t know about Hood, Burks has been hurt and disappointing, Dante has been on ice his whole career, Kanter, Burke, Lyles. Thanks so much to Denver for gifting us DM for a bum. Oh, yea they fouled up the Hayward extension.
My point is this organization regularly fails at high draft picks. I get the idea but these people will let the next Jordan pass for some bum. Utah sucks at drafting high. They are pretty good at identifying and pursuing prospects late lottery and beyond. But they are garbage with high picks.
I guess my question is how are you Tankers going to convince the Jazz to hire you? You guys are clearly better at identifying talent than our FO.
No, it just happens that the two drafts we had high draft picks in happened to be bad/unlucky/injury ridden high pick drafts. It matters which draft you draft in. There are drafts and then there are DRAFTS(example, I would have tanked last year and this coming year, I wouldn't have tanked in the Ben Simmons year, because I didn't see the high end talent besides Simmons/Ingram). When you look at the Exum draft, there is no star after Exum got drafted. Everybody around that pick is either a bust or their career has been severely altered by injuries. Look at the Kanter draft. The first all-star in that draft(after Kanter) was Kemba... then Klay at 11 and Kawhi at 15. Noone was projecting Klay or Kawhi at 3. NOONE. There is no front office you could have hired that would have drafted either of them at 3. Both are completely different level of players now than when they entered the league. Kawhi is even a different TYPE of player now.
We also drafted Deron high. Don't draw conclusions based on small samples and/or bad drafts. This front office has had a single top 5 pick and that's Exum. And he missed a year and a half with ACL and now is missing another year with shoulder injury. Sometimes you just get unlucky. Exum might still turn out to be a good player(probably not all star). Picks after the top 5-6 are really not as successful as you might think. The all-star success rate in the 6-10 range is probably about 10-15%. That's why you tank for no. 1, not for no.8
Also I wouldn't say we are better identifying talent than our FO. I wanted Exum in the draft and if I had to play it out again, I probably would choose Exum again(and hope his development doesn't get stunted by series of injuries). I don't remember my thoughts on the Kanter draft but he looked like a talented player from the few vids I saw of him at the time. He just turned out to be horrible defender.