KqWIN wrote:It is a fact that we've played better with Mitchell at PG, particularly on offense. Our net rating with Mitchell playing the point is +0.1 and our offensive rating is 109.7. Our net rating with Rubio playing PG is -5.5 and our offensive rating is 101.4.
The statement that we have been playing better with Mitchell at PG is indeed a fact. There is no opinion to it.
Whether or not Rubio should finish games is a different discussion. I'm not trying to make a point as to whether or not he should play.
Sigh. I'm about to give up this discussion since it obviously leads nowhere.
Sure, from a statistical point of view, Mitchell has produced offensively better numbers. What can you take away from that? That he is the better option? No. That he should be the point guard of this team? No. They havent played against the same opponent, the situations are not comparable, so that is a typical number that - if naively interpreted in a too simplicistic way - does more bad than good.
Whatever, man. I dont feel like thers much common ground. I'll just stop commenting on your posts i guess, since everyone else is probably bored/annoyed by this discussion already.