Game 68: Houston Rockets (16-51) @ Utah Jazz (49-18)

Moderators: Inigo Montoya, FJS

Crunch 99
General Manager
Posts: 7,874
And1: 3,867
Joined: Jan 05, 2017
 

Game 68: Houston Rockets (16-51) @ Utah Jazz (49-18) 

Post#1 » by Crunch 99 » Sat May 8, 2021 1:20 pm

red4hf
Jazz Forum GTS Champion 2019-2020
Posts: 10,840
And1: 1,099
Joined: Jul 04, 2002

Re: Game 68: Houston Rockets (16-51) @ Utah Jazz (49-18) 

Post#2 » by red4hf » Sat May 8, 2021 6:12 pm

Who will be the first to say it?
ducler
Cold Hard Gameday Facts
Posts: 15,616
And1: 8,999
Joined: Jun 15, 2008
Location: France
 

Re: Game 68: Houston Rockets (16-51) @ Utah Jazz (49-18) 

Post#3 » by ducler » Sat May 8, 2021 7:05 pm

Read on Twitter
Image
Catchall
RealGM
Posts: 20,579
And1: 11,169
Joined: Jul 06, 2008
     

Re: Game 68: Houston Rockets (16-51) @ Utah Jazz (49-18) 

Post#4 » by Catchall » Sun May 9, 2021 2:03 am

Do the Rockets even have 8 guys eligible?
Catchall
RealGM
Posts: 20,579
And1: 11,169
Joined: Jul 06, 2008
     

Re: Game 68: Houston Rockets (16-51) @ Utah Jazz (49-18) 

Post#5 » by Catchall » Sun May 9, 2021 4:51 am

Real lively thread we've got here...
@ndrew
Analyst
Posts: 3,032
And1: 219
Joined: Jan 15, 2006
Location: Vladivostok, Russia
Contact:
 

Re: Game 68: Houston Rockets (16-51) @ Utah Jazz (49-18) 

Post#6 » by @ndrew » Sun May 9, 2021 7:30 am

first for 50. Let's hope we are fully healthy play off time.
Image
zero24gravity
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,698
And1: 842
Joined: Jan 08, 2017
 

Re: Game 68: Houston Rockets (16-51) @ Utah Jazz (49-18) 

Post#7 » by zero24gravity » Mon May 10, 2021 5:20 pm

red4hf wrote:Who will be the first to say it?


Say what? That the Jazz played like crap against a team consisting of 8 players who are all end of bench/G-League players, who's tallest player was 6'6", and wouldn't have lost ugly vs most teams with that display? Should have been a game where they were resting starters nearly the entire 2nd half.

Me, me! I'll say it!

And no, I don't buy into the BS that those are the hardest games to play. The talent (and size) differential was so vast that there's no excuse, especially after 2 recent embarrassing losses to the Timberpuppies. The Jazz are down their All Star backcourt, and still winning, I get it. But there needs to be more focus. Too many mental errors, whether they be on D or TO's, are not just going to go away when the playoffs start. At this point they may even find themselves the first ever 1st seed to be underdogs, if the Lakers somehow find themselves sliding back to 8 and LBJ + Davis become healthy for the playoffs.

Time to play like champions no matter who you're up against.
red4hf
Jazz Forum GTS Champion 2019-2020
Posts: 10,840
And1: 1,099
Joined: Jul 04, 2002

Re: Game 68: Houston Rockets (16-51) @ Utah Jazz (49-18) 

Post#8 » by red4hf » Mon May 10, 2021 6:33 pm

zero24gravity wrote:
red4hf wrote:Who will be the first to say it?


Say what? That the Jazz played like crap against a team consisting of 8 players who are all end of bench/G-League players, who's tallest player was 6'6", and wouldn't have lost ugly vs most teams with that display? Should have been a game where they were resting starters nearly the entire 2nd half.

Me, me! I'll say it!

And no, I don't buy into the BS that those are the hardest games to play. The talent (and size) differential was so vast that there's no excuse, especially after 2 recent embarrassing losses to the Timberpuppies. The Jazz are down their All Star backcourt, and still winning, I get it. But there needs to be more focus. Too many mental errors, whether they be on D or TO's, are not just going to go away when the playoffs start. At this point they may even find themselves the first ever 1st seed to be underdogs, if the Lakers somehow find themselves sliding back to 8 and LBJ + Davis become healthy for the playoffs.

Time to play like champions no matter who you're up against.


Well, I was going for, who will be the first to say that the game was a trap..... Which it almost turned out to be......

Can't argue with anything you said......
User avatar
Inigo Montoya
Forum Mod - Jazz
Forum Mod - Jazz
Posts: 17,198
And1: 8,464
Joined: May 31, 2012

Re: Game 68: Houston Rockets (16-51) @ Utah Jazz (49-18) 

Post#9 » by Inigo Montoya » Mon May 10, 2021 6:54 pm

It has long been established that the Jazz face 82 trap games in a normal-length regular season.
Draft Nate Wolters - FAILED
Keep Nate Wolters - FAILED
Image
KqWIN wrote:Why are we talking about Middleton, Harris, and Porter?

The real decision the Jazz FO is making is between Continuity, Cap Flexibility, and Cash Considerations.
Catchall
RealGM
Posts: 20,579
And1: 11,169
Joined: Jul 06, 2008
     

Re: Game 68: Houston Rockets (16-51) @ Utah Jazz (49-18) 

Post#10 » by Catchall » Mon May 10, 2021 7:09 pm

zero24gravity wrote:
red4hf wrote:Who will be the first to say it?


Say what? That the Jazz played like crap against a team consisting of 8 players who are all end of bench/G-League players, who's tallest player was 6'6", and wouldn't have lost ugly vs most teams with that display? Should have been a game where they were resting starters nearly the entire 2nd half.

Me, me! I'll say it!

And no, I don't buy into the BS that those are the hardest games to play. The talent (and size) differential was so vast that there's no excuse, especially after 2 recent embarrassing losses to the Timberpuppies. The Jazz are down their All Star backcourt, and still winning, I get it. But there needs to be more focus. Too many mental errors, whether they be on D or TO's, are not just going to go away when the playoffs start. At this point they may even find themselves the first ever 1st seed to be underdogs, if the Lakers somehow find themselves sliding back to 8 and LBJ + Davis become healthy for the playoffs.

Time to play like champions no matter who you're up against.


Dude, the Jazz just won a hard-fought emotional game against the Nuggets the night before. The Jazz were exhausted and playing at half speed all night. They just needed about 6 - 8 solid minutes to open an 18-point lead and win the game, which is what they did.

Jazz were up by 18 pts with under 6 mins to play, and they just cruised from there.
zero24gravity
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,698
And1: 842
Joined: Jan 08, 2017
 

Re: Game 68: Houston Rockets (16-51) @ Utah Jazz (49-18) 

Post#11 » by zero24gravity » Mon May 10, 2021 9:11 pm

Catchall wrote:
zero24gravity wrote:
red4hf wrote:Who will be the first to say it?


Say what? That the Jazz played like crap against a team consisting of 8 players who are all end of bench/G-League players, who's tallest player was 6'6", and wouldn't have lost ugly vs most teams with that display? Should have been a game where they were resting starters nearly the entire 2nd half.

Me, me! I'll say it!

And no, I don't buy into the BS that those are the hardest games to play. The talent (and size) differential was so vast that there's no excuse, especially after 2 recent embarrassing losses to the Timberpuppies. The Jazz are down their All Star backcourt, and still winning, I get it. But there needs to be more focus. Too many mental errors, whether they be on D or TO's, are not just going to go away when the playoffs start. At this point they may even find themselves the first ever 1st seed to be underdogs, if the Lakers somehow find themselves sliding back to 8 and LBJ + Davis become healthy for the playoffs.

Time to play like champions no matter who you're up against.


Dude, the Jazz just won a hard-fought emotional game against the Nuggets the night before. The Jazz were exhausted and playing at half speed all night. They just needed about 6 - 8 solid minutes to open an 18-point lead and win the game, which is what they did.

Jazz were up by 18 pts with under 6 mins to play, and they just cruised from there.


Agree to disagree.

Against a team that wasn't using 8 players, many of which aren't even NBA caliber, and had a 6'6" SF playing center ... then there's leeway for playing a tough 1st game on a back to back. But nope, not giving them credit for that one. It's a loss everywhere except the standings, IMO. (And yeah, that standings are what matters most, I get it.) The Jazz's bottom 8 should have been able to win that one, as opposed to taking 30+ minutes from Bogy, Rudy, Joe & Royce, plus a career high scoring game from Niang, and still only squeaking out an 8 point win and giving up 116 points to what was essentially a practice squad. They wouldn't beat a single playoff team with a game like that, and that's a problem. I have higher expectations of them, and don't think that's unreasonable.

Return to Utah Jazz