RealGM

The feeling is terrible when the other team shoots and hits a lot 3s. Now I know how the other teams feel.

Doing well holding their stars down

Just gotta hit shots

Whats up with our bench? 7/27 on 3’s ugh

Mitchell is back with the eye of the tiger.

Double post. Sorry.

FAVORS

I'm proud of you Jazz.

That DM turnover had me a little worried though, no lie.

Gobeeeeeeeeert!!!!

I think this game is when people start to really believe.

That mix of zone in the 2nd half confused them and I don’t expect that to continue. But they failed to keep us from wide open shots and I do expect that to continue. Rudy is a massive pressure on the rim and therefore teams will always choose wide open 3s to his dunk

Stifle Tower, Gobzilla, Ruuudyyyyyyy! Whatever you call him, after that 2nd half with 3 blocks & the game winning play (Again), know he’ll give it all he has until the buzzer. DM, ties Malone with his 4th 40+ playoff game. The 2 stars led the way, I hope Conley can play soon as his absence was really felt especially in the 1st quarter. Terrific game glad Jazz came out in top!

Thought the Jazz were toast after that terrible first half. No Conley, and shooting night, and a terrible half and I would have thought this was an L.

Impressed with their defense and how Mitchell played in that second half. Especially their defense. Hopefully Conley will be back soon as I'm not sure we can get out of this round without him.

What a game! I feel super fortunate the Jazz won on such a poor shooting night. Going forward I don’t think they’ll have that luxury.

The defense is what made the difference in the 2nd half.

Have to give Locke credit he predicted this zone approach and it worked. We got called on illegal defense and honestly I don’t know what that was. I thought you could morph between zone and man maybe I’m wrong

BudTugly wrote:The defense is what made the difference in the 2nd half.

Have to give Locke credit he predicted this zone approach and it worked. We got called on illegal defense and honestly I don’t know what that was. I thought you could morph between zone and man maybe I’m wrong

I think it was a 3 second violation because Gobert didn't tag anyone.

babyjax13 wrote:

BudTugly wrote:The defense is what made the difference in the 2nd half.

Have to give Locke credit he predicted this zone approach and it worked. We got called on illegal defense and honestly I don’t know what that was. I thought you could morph between zone and man maybe I’m wrong

I think it was a 3 second violation because Gobert didn't tag anyone.

3 seconds is a specific call. We got called on illegal defense. My problem is I’m ignorant and don’t understand what that means.

BudTugly wrote:

babyjax13 wrote:

BudTugly wrote:The defense is what made the difference in the 2nd half.

Have to give Locke credit he predicted this zone approach and it worked. We got called on illegal defense and honestly I don’t know what that was. I thought you could morph between zone and man maybe I’m wrong

I think it was a 3 second violation because Gobert didn't tag anyone.

3 seconds is a specific call. We got called on illegal defense. My problem is I’m ignorant and don’t understand what that means.

I am fairly certain illegal defense also refers to defensive three seconds. I can't find anything in the NBA online rulebook for 'illegal defense,' which obviously used to refer to zone.

babyjax13 wrote:

BudTugly wrote:

babyjax13 wrote:
I think it was a 3 second violation because Gobert didn't tag anyone.

3 seconds is a specific call. We got called on illegal defense. My problem is I’m ignorant and don’t understand what that means.

I am fairly certain illegal defense also refers to defensive three seconds. I can't find anything in the NBA online rulebook for 'illegal defense,' which obviously used to refer to zone.

Again they called Illegal defense. I want to know what that is

BudTugly wrote:

babyjax13 wrote:

BudTugly wrote:
3 seconds is a specific call. We got called on illegal defense. My problem is I’m ignorant and don’t understand what that means.

I am fairly certain illegal defense also refers to defensive three seconds. I can't find anything in the NBA online rulebook for 'illegal defense,' which obviously used to refer to zone.

Again they called Illegal defense. I want to know what that is

Well, you probably won't find it in the rulebook: https://ak-static-int.nba.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2016/11/2016-2017-Rule-Book.pdf

It's defensive three seconds, I've been looking through the rulebook, and it's the only possibility. They called it a three second call in the TNT-OT stream (no live play-by-play).

babyjax13 wrote:

BudTugly wrote:

babyjax13 wrote:
I am fairly certain illegal defense also refers to defensive three seconds. I can't find anything in the NBA online rulebook for 'illegal defense,' which obviously used to refer to zone.

Again they called Illegal defense. I want to know what that is

Well, you probably won't find it in the rulebook: https://ak-static-int.nba.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2016/11/2016-2017-Rule-Book.pdf

It's defensive three seconds, I've been looking through the rulebook, and it's the only possibility. They called it a three second call in the TNT-OT stream (no live play-by-play).

Thanks buddy. Sounds like I have a weird beef

babyjax13 wrote:

BudTugly wrote:The defense is what made the difference in the 2nd half.

Have to give Locke credit he predicted this zone approach and it worked. We got called on illegal defense and honestly I don’t know what that was. I thought you could morph between zone and man maybe I’m wrong

I think it was a 3 second violation because Gobert didn't tag anyone.

And he probably could have gotten called for it a couple of times.