Game 59: Jazz at Pacers
Moderators: Inigo Montoya, FJS
Game 59: Jazz at Pacers
-
red4hf
- Jazz Forum GTS Champion 2019-2020
- Posts: 10,836
- And1: 1,097
- Joined: Jul 04, 2002
Game 59: Jazz at Pacers
Kessler and Azubuike playing well........
Re: Game 59: Jazz at Pacers
-
red4hf
- Jazz Forum GTS Champion 2019-2020
- Posts: 10,836
- And1: 1,097
- Joined: Jul 04, 2002
Re: Game 59: Jazz at Pacers
Clarkson has caught fire in the 3rd.......
Re: Game 59: Jazz at Pacers
-
red4hf
- Jazz Forum GTS Champion 2019-2020
- Posts: 10,836
- And1: 1,097
- Joined: Jul 04, 2002
Re: Game 59: Jazz at Pacers
Great win by the Jazz.....
Re: Game 59: Jazz at Pacers
-
WinterSoldier
- Senior
- Posts: 572
- And1: 260
- Joined: Mar 28, 2015
-
Re: Game 59: Jazz at Pacers
Jazz on track for the coveted triple crown losers, best record outside of play in, worst pick in the lottery, and losing the player (Clarkson) who they stupidly held on to after the trade deadline. All the Jazz fans that were complaining should be happy that we are consistently the same situationally for the last 30 years.
Re: Game 59: Jazz at Pacers
-
red4hf
- Jazz Forum GTS Champion 2019-2020
- Posts: 10,836
- And1: 1,097
- Joined: Jul 04, 2002
Re: Game 59: Jazz at Pacers
WinterSoldier wrote:Jazz on track for the coveted triple crown losers, best record outside of play in, worst pick in the lottery, and losing the player (Clarkson) who they stupidly held on to after the trade deadline. All the Jazz fans that were complaining should be happy that we are consistently the same situationally for the last 30 years.
It's certainly looking that way...... I still don't understand how Clarkson wasn't traded.......
Re: Game 59: Jazz at Pacers
-
Crunch 99
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,873
- And1: 3,867
- Joined: Jan 05, 2017
-
Re: Game 59: Jazz at Pacers
Jazz outrebounded the Pacers 46 to 32, including 11 to 8 on orebs. Dok had 9 rebs and 2 orebs in 13 minutes.
Re: Game 59: Jazz at Pacers
- Inigo Montoya
- Forum Mod - Jazz

- Posts: 17,186
- And1: 8,457
- Joined: May 31, 2012
Re: Game 59: Jazz at Pacers
We can't even lose properly. Do we need to clone Azubuike and play five of them at the same time?
Draft Nate Wolters - FAILED
Keep Nate Wolters - FAILED

Keep Nate Wolters - FAILED

KqWIN wrote:Why are we talking about Middleton, Harris, and Porter?
The real decision the Jazz FO is making is between Continuity, Cap Flexibility, and Cash Considerations.
Re: Game 59: Jazz at Pacers
- FJS
- Senior Mod - Jazz

- Posts: 18,811
- And1: 2,182
- Joined: Sep 19, 2002
- Location: Barcelona, Spain
-
Re: Game 59: Jazz at Pacers
-
zero24gravity
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,698
- And1: 842
- Joined: Jan 08, 2017
-
Re: Game 59: Jazz at Pacers
red4hf wrote:WinterSoldier wrote:Jazz on track for the coveted triple crown losers, best record outside of play in, worst pick in the lottery, and losing the player (Clarkson) who they stupidly held on to after the trade deadline. All the Jazz fans that were complaining should be happy that we are consistently the same situationally for the last 30 years.
It's certainly looking that way...... I still don't understand how Clarkson wasn't traded.......
Perhaps the market wasn't as great as we think it may have been for him. Or maybe he told the team he really wants to stay, so the Jazz feel confident about re-signing? Everything (positive and negative) is pure speculation, so it's hard to say. Still, I have a hard to believing the FO thinks they are likely to lose him and they didn't move him. Let's just hope they aren't getting Haywood'ed.
Regarding the Pacers game... I can't root for them to lose, even though I know that is likely the best thing for this team. I am glad they aren't just rolling over, no matter what. Would really like to see what JTA and Jones have to offer. Hopefully after the AS break they'll have a little practice time under their belts and see the floor.
Re: Game 59: Jazz at Pacers
-
red4hf
- Jazz Forum GTS Champion 2019-2020
- Posts: 10,836
- And1: 1,097
- Joined: Jul 04, 2002
Re: Game 59: Jazz at Pacers
zero24gravity wrote:red4hf wrote:WinterSoldier wrote:Jazz on track for the coveted triple crown losers, best record outside of play in, worst pick in the lottery, and losing the player (Clarkson) who they stupidly held on to after the trade deadline. All the Jazz fans that were complaining should be happy that we are consistently the same situationally for the last 30 years.
It's certainly looking that way...... I still don't understand how Clarkson wasn't traded.......
Perhaps the market wasn't as great as we think it may have been for him. Or maybe he told the team he really wants to stay, so the Jazz feel confident about re-signing? Everything (positive and negative) is pure speculation, so it's hard to say. Still, I have a hard to believing the FO thinks they are likely to lose him and they didn't move him. Let's just hope they aren't getting Haywood'ed.
Regarding the Pacers game... I can't root for them to lose, even though I know that is likely the best thing for this team. I am glad they aren't just rolling over, no matter what. Would really like to see what JTA and Jones have to offer. Hopefully after the AS break they'll have a little practice time under their belts and see the floor.
I agree with you, I simply couldn't root for my team to lose......
Re: Game 59: Jazz at Pacers
-
edededtut
- Senior
- Posts: 525
- And1: 699
- Joined: Dec 28, 2019
Re: Game 59: Jazz at Pacers
Really impressive. What I dont get though is why didn’t they force him more to the left. Obviously difficult but when going right he basically did what he wanted. That one weirdo floater going left looked a lot more difficult, even though he made that too..


