Page 1 of 3

Reclaimed projects

Posted: Wed Feb 15, 2023 2:55 am
by Wolverine
Lock mentions this on his podcast referring to people like Jason Collins etc who have potential but are possibly in the wrong environment. I thought we should’ve gone after Thybulle personally but are there any that you think are worth a roll of the dice?

Re: Reclaimed projects

Posted: Wed Feb 15, 2023 10:47 pm
by bkohler
This is a great question because I think this is exactly how we’ll use our salary space next season.

I think in general we’ll be looking for people that have things effecting their value but have displayed the raw talent. Probably over paid, oft injured or viewed as aging out.

I imagine that we’ll also be looking for situations where these projects will come with picks attached as well.

A few names come to mind:

Ben Simmons (pretty obvious imo)
Duncan Robinson
Lonzo Ball
MPJ

Re: Reclaimed projects

Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2023 2:01 am
by Wolverine
The $60,000,000 doesnt mean that much in terms of signing free agents as we know they don't want to play in Utah. So this is potentially the only way

Re: Reclaimed projects

Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2023 2:29 am
by bkohler
I think there's such a thing as a reclamation signing as well.

Where you sign someone to a team-friendly deal that might be longer than others are willing to do, in an attempt to rehab that player's value over time.


I could see players like Dangelo Russell, Josh Richardson, and Dario Saric fitting into that category and getting a contract offer thrown their way.

Re: Reclaimed projects

Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2023 3:39 am
by bkohler
Don't mean to post back to back but I was just thinking that I'd look for players in a few different groups:
- Overpaid but productive (think Joe Harris)
- Players playing without a good/natural PG (think Julius Randle last year)
- Players playing third/fourth fiddle on a good team (think Mikal Bridges)
- Players playing outside of their natural position (Lauri to some extent)
- Players playing with bad spacing (anyone in Chicago)

Re: Reclaimed projects

Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2023 3:42 am
by babyjax13
I'm enjoying what we've done so far, THT finally seems to be in shape and is improving, Lauri was a revelation, etc.

John (not Jason) Collins makes sense, I'm out on Simmons, though. Aaron Nesmith might have some potential.

Re: Reclaimed projects

Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2023 9:47 am
by Inigo Montoya
I would much rather going after players who make small and medium sized salaries instead of huge salaries like Simmons and Collins because it is much easier to outperform their contract. If Collins or Simmons play well, they only justify their contracts.

Re: Reclaimed projects

Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2023 2:09 pm
by bkohler
Inigo Montoya wrote:I would much rather going after players who make small and medium sized salaries instead of huge salaries like Simmons and Collins because it is much easier to outperform their contract. If Collins or Simmons play well, they only justify their contracts.


I agree! I think the only way you take on one of those contracts is with heavy incentive.

Re: Reclaimed projects

Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2023 9:50 pm
by SoCalJazzFan
Not a reclamation project by any means, but if the Nets decide to blow it up completely and rebuild this summer, I would be willing to pay several draft picks for Mikal Bridges and absorb him into our cap space.

Re: Reclaimed projects

Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2023 12:40 am
by babyjax13
I'd kind of like to see if we can peel Fultz or Suggs from Orlando. Likely they keep both and instead try to move Anthony, who I'm just not interested in.

Re: Reclaimed projects

Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2023 3:12 am
by bkohler
babyjax13 wrote:I'd kind of like to see if we can peel Fultz or Suggs from Orlando. Likely they keep both and instead try to move Anthony, who I'm just not interested in.


If they get the second pick I think the odds of one of them coming loose increases.

Re: Reclaimed projects

Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2023 3:13 pm
by Inigo Montoya
babyjax13 wrote:I'd kind of like to see if we can peel Fultz or Suggs from Orlando. Likely they keep both and instead try to move Anthony, who I'm just not interested in.

Yeah, I'd like to roll the dice on Suggs if possible. Don't know how much he'd cost but I find him intriguing.

Re: Reclaimed projects

Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2023 5:13 am
by babyjax13
Inigo Montoya wrote:
babyjax13 wrote:I'd kind of like to see if we can peel Fultz or Suggs from Orlando. Likely they keep both and instead try to move Anthony, who I'm just not interested in.

Yeah, I'd like to roll the dice on Suggs if possible. Don't know how much he'd cost but I find him intriguing.

I'd assume quite a bit. I'd probably do two or three firsts for him, but our least valuable ones. Fultz is the guy that might be more attainable, but it depends on how the FO feels about Anthony and where they end up drafting.

Re: Reclaimed projects

Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2023 3:32 am
by pickIBL
bkohler wrote:
Inigo Montoya wrote:I would much rather going after players who make small and medium sized salaries instead of huge salaries like Simmons and Collins because it is much easier to outperform their contract. If Collins or Simmons play well, they only justify their contracts.


I agree! I think the only way you take on one of those contracts is with heavy incentive.

You know it's probably best to steer clear of head cases... because sometimes the Nick Andersons just cant be fixed. But Ben actually has all the skills that fred hoiberg sold kevin mchale on with royce white.

I can play head games too. I'd run Ben Simmons through shooting drills in practice on a rim with a wider diameter before games.

Re: Reclaimed projects

Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2023 6:08 am
by edededtut
Report: Jazz Sign Former Top-5 Point Guard

what a beautiful headline. too bad the link gives it away:

https://www.si.com/nba/jazz/news/jazz-sign-kris-dunn

Re: Reclaimed projects

Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2023 1:04 pm
by Crunch 99
zero24gravity wrote:The Jazz signed Frank Jackson and Kris Dunn to 10 day contracts.

Jackson (24 yrs old) was killing it with the Stars as a 6'3" SG, scoring over 22 ppg with impressive 49/44/84 shooting splits. A fun side-story is that he played high school ball in Utah.

Dunn is a vet (28 yrs old, #5 overall pick in 2016), who has decent size (6'3") at the point. If I remember correctly, Dunn is a positive defender, but his shot leaves much to be desired (29% career 3%). Good news is, his 3% is over 41% in the G-League this year.

I was kinda hoping for a Mac McClung signing, but the 76ers nabbed him. With that said, I approve of these signings and hope they, especially Jackson, get actual PT during real game-time to see if they can contribute moving forward.

https://www.ksl.com/article/50584148/jazz-sign-frank-jackson-kris-dunn-to-10-day-contracts-with-team

https://www.hoopsrumors.com/2023/02/jazz-to-sign-frank-jackson-kris-dunn-to-10-day-contracts.html


More than one and Dunn?

Thought I would reply to Zero here since Dunn qualifies as a reclamation project. With us needing to have a minimum 14 players, Dunn has a great opportunity to be more than one and dunn, and to actually earn a spot on the roster. If Sexton is still out with hammy, Dunn will see time on the floor during the ten day, but I think THT might start.

I hope Dunn has really learned to hit the three ball, but we've still got a relatively small sample this season in G League, where he is 31 3PM on 75 3PA. And it is harder to hit threes in the NBA imo. Dunn has played 33 G-League games this season, but only started 11 of them. Hopefully he was progressing and started the last 11 games. He's got an excellent ORtg, DRtg, PER and TS% in G-League this season, but it is G-League, not NBA. Regardless, I am cautiously optimistic for chances of Dunn sticking on the Jazz for the remainder of the season.

Image
https://basketball.realgm.com/player/Kris-Dunn/Summary/28240#D-League

Re: Reclaimed projects

Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2023 3:21 pm
by zero24gravity
Crunch 99 wrote:
zero24gravity wrote:The Jazz signed Frank Jackson and Kris Dunn to 10 day contracts.

Jackson (24 yrs old) was killing it with the Stars as a 6'3" SG, scoring over 22 ppg with impressive 49/44/84 shooting splits. A fun side-story is that he played high school ball in Utah.

Dunn is a vet (28 yrs old, #5 overall pick in 2016), who has decent size (6'3") at the point. If I remember correctly, Dunn is a positive defender, but his shot leaves much to be desired (29% career 3%). Good news is, his 3% is over 41% in the G-League this year.

I was kinda hoping for a Mac McClung signing, but the 76ers nabbed him. With that said, I approve of these signings and hope they, especially Jackson, get actual PT during real game-time to see if they can contribute moving forward.

https://www.ksl.com/article/50584148/jazz-sign-frank-jackson-kris-dunn-to-10-day-contracts-with-team

https://www.hoopsrumors.com/2023/02/jazz-to-sign-frank-jackson-kris-dunn-to-10-day-contracts.html


More than one and Dunn?

Thought I would reply to Zero here since Dunn qualifies as a reclamation project. With us needing to have a minimum 14 players, Dunn has a great opportunity to be more than one and dunn, and to actually earn a spot on the roster. If Sexton is still out with hammy, Dunn will see time on the floor during the ten day, but I think THT might start.

I hope Dunn has really learned to hit the three ball, but we've still got a relatively small sample this season in G League, where he is 31 3PM on 75 3PA. And it is harder to hit threes in the NBA imo. Dunn has played 33 G-League games this season, but only started 11 of them. Hopefully he was progressing and started the last 11 games. He's got an excellent ORtg, DRtg, PER and TS% in G-League this season, but it is G-League, not NBA. Regardless, I am cautiously optimistic for chances of Dunn sticking on the Jazz for the remainder of the season.

Image
https://basketball.realgm.com/player/Kris-Dunn/Summary/28240#D-League


Good call on him being a reclamation project. He's got NBA skills. If his shot is respectable, he goes from Trent Forrest 2.0 to becoming a legit NBA rotation player. I haven't heard anything about Sexton's injury situation, but with him not missing the Skills Contest during the weekend, it leads me to think his injury is pretty minor. Even if Sexton is ok, I still hope coach gives the two 10 day guys a real look.

Re: Reclaimed projects

Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2023 5:15 pm
by Crunch 99
zero24gravity wrote:
Good call on him being a reclamation project. He's got NBA skills. If his shot is respectable, he goes from Trent Forrest 2.0 to becoming a legit NBA rotation player. I haven't heard anything about Sexton's injury situation, but with him not missing the Skills Contest during the weekend, it leads me to think his injury is pretty minor. Even if Sexton is ok, I still hope coach gives the two 10 day guys a real look.


Thanks. I didn't realize Sexton was a participant in All Star weekend.

Re: Reclaimed projects

Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2023 5:41 pm
by zero24gravity
Crunch 99 wrote:
zero24gravity wrote:
Good call on him being a reclamation project. He's got NBA skills. If his shot is respectable, he goes from Trent Forrest 2.0 to becoming a legit NBA rotation player. I haven't heard anything about Sexton's injury situation, but with him not missing the Skills Contest during the weekend, it leads me to think his injury is pretty minor. Even if Sexton is ok, I still hope coach gives the two 10 day guys a real look.


Thanks. I didn't realize Sexton was a participant in All Star weekend.


JC, Sexton & Kessler won the Skills Contest :D

Re: Reclaimed projects

Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2023 5:58 pm
by Inigo Montoya
Can't we "reclaim" 23-24 year old players instead of 28-29?