Game 52: Utah Jazz (12-39) @ Los Angeles Lakers (31-19)
Moderators: FJS, Inigo Montoya
Game 52: Utah Jazz (12-39) @ Los Angeles Lakers (31-19)
-
Inigo Montoya
- Forum Mod - Jazz
- Posts: 16,841
- And1: 8,113
- Joined: May 31, 2012
Game 52: Utah Jazz (12-39) @ Los Angeles Lakers (31-19)
Hopefully this game won't be a W for the Jazz but also not an embarrassment on national TV.
Draft Nate Wolters - FAILED
Keep Nate Wolters - FAILED
Keep Nate Wolters - FAILED
KqWIN wrote:Why are we talking about Middleton, Harris, and Porter?
The real decision the Jazz FO is making is between Continuity, Cap Flexibility, and Cash Considerations.
Re: Game 52: Utah Jazz (12-39) @ Los Angeles Lakers (31-19)
-
TNJazz
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,107
- And1: 481
- Joined: Jan 07, 2017
-
Re: Game 52: Utah Jazz (12-39) @ Los Angeles Lakers (31-19)
Inigo Montoya wrote:Hopefully this game won't be a W for the Jazz but also not an embarrassment on national TV.
Well...about that second part...
Re: Game 52: Utah Jazz (12-39) @ Los Angeles Lakers (31-19)
-
Inigo Montoya
- Forum Mod - Jazz
- Posts: 16,841
- And1: 8,113
- Joined: May 31, 2012
Re: Game 52: Utah Jazz (12-39) @ Los Angeles Lakers (31-19)
TNJazz wrote:Well...about that second part...
Eh. It wasn't great, not doubt about it, but it wasn't a total catastrophe.
Draft Nate Wolters - FAILED
Keep Nate Wolters - FAILED
Keep Nate Wolters - FAILED
KqWIN wrote:Why are we talking about Middleton, Harris, and Porter?
The real decision the Jazz FO is making is between Continuity, Cap Flexibility, and Cash Considerations.