
Game 81: Utah Jazz (17-63) vs. Oklahoma City Thunder (66-14)
Moderators: FJS, Inigo Montoya
Game 81: Utah Jazz (17-63) vs. Oklahoma City Thunder (66-14)
- Inigo Montoya
- Forum Mod - Jazz
- Posts: 16,841
- And1: 8,113
- Joined: May 31, 2012
Game 81: Utah Jazz (17-63) vs. Oklahoma City Thunder (66-14)
It would really suck if the Jazz somehow sabotage themselves in the last three games of the season (which includes the win against Portland) and pick up another W. Enjoy it while you can, only one more game to go.


Draft Nate Wolters - FAILED
Keep Nate Wolters - FAILED

Keep Nate Wolters - FAILED

KqWIN wrote:Why are we talking about Middleton, Harris, and Porter?
The real decision the Jazz FO is making is between Continuity, Cap Flexibility, and Cash Considerations.
Re: Game 81: Utah Jazz (17-63) vs. Oklahoma City Thunder (66-14)
- Inigo Montoya
- Forum Mod - Jazz
- Posts: 16,841
- And1: 8,113
- Joined: May 31, 2012
Re: Game 81: Utah Jazz (17-63) vs. Oklahoma City Thunder (66-14)
Looks like the Thunder are going to sit out pretty much everybody in this game, so take that into consideration.


Draft Nate Wolters - FAILED
Keep Nate Wolters - FAILED

Keep Nate Wolters - FAILED

KqWIN wrote:Why are we talking about Middleton, Harris, and Porter?
The real decision the Jazz FO is making is between Continuity, Cap Flexibility, and Cash Considerations.
Re: Game 81: Utah Jazz (17-63) vs. Oklahoma City Thunder (66-14)
- Inigo Montoya
- Forum Mod - Jazz
- Posts: 16,841
- And1: 8,113
- Joined: May 31, 2012
Re: Game 81: Utah Jazz (17-63) vs. Oklahoma City Thunder (66-14)
I'm impressed the Jazz were able to lose this game in such a convincing fashion, I was genuinely concerned they'd win this one. Respect.
Draft Nate Wolters - FAILED
Keep Nate Wolters - FAILED

Keep Nate Wolters - FAILED

KqWIN wrote:Why are we talking about Middleton, Harris, and Porter?
The real decision the Jazz FO is making is between Continuity, Cap Flexibility, and Cash Considerations.
Re: Game 81: Utah Jazz (17-63) vs. Oklahoma City Thunder (66-14)
-
- Senior
- Posts: 616
- And1: 155
- Joined: Jan 13, 2017
-
Re: Game 81: Utah Jazz (17-63) vs. Oklahoma City Thunder (66-14)
Inigo Montoya wrote:I'm impressed the Jazz were able to lose this game in such a convincing fashion, I was genuinely concerned they'd win this one. Respect.
U worry too much…

Re: Game 81: Utah Jazz (17-63) vs. Oklahoma City Thunder (66-14)
- Inigo Montoya
- Forum Mod - Jazz
- Posts: 16,841
- And1: 8,113
- Joined: May 31, 2012
Re: Game 81: Utah Jazz (17-63) vs. Oklahoma City Thunder (66-14)
AGE1207 wrote:Inigo Montoya wrote:I'm impressed the Jazz were able to lose this game in such a convincing fashion, I was genuinely concerned they'd win this one. Respect.
U worry too much…
I thought that because the Thunder were sitting everyone while playing on the road against the Jazz who are used to roll with this roster (because they sat out their best players all season long pretty much), the Jazz would have some sort of advantage. At the very least I thought it'd be close and not a 34-point blowout. What can I say, this loss is impressive

Draft Nate Wolters - FAILED
Keep Nate Wolters - FAILED

Keep Nate Wolters - FAILED

KqWIN wrote:Why are we talking about Middleton, Harris, and Porter?
The real decision the Jazz FO is making is between Continuity, Cap Flexibility, and Cash Considerations.