Jazz / Clippers trade - fair value?

Moderators: Inigo Montoya, FJS

sendai91
Rookie
Posts: 1,247
And1: 14
Joined: Apr 02, 2006

Jazz / Clippers trade - fair value? 

Post#1 » by sendai91 » Mon May 19, 2008 3:56 pm

How reasonable is an offer that centers around Okur, Ronnie Brewer and either Morris Almond or the Jazz 2008 #1 pick and the 2010 NY unprotected #1 pick for Kaman and Brevin Knight? Or, Okur, Harpring, Brewer and either Almond or 2008 #1 and the NY 2010 for Kaman and Mobley?

It's a lot to give up for Kaman, but I think he's the missing answer, and you have to pay a lot to get what we need.

If it's the second trade, we have a lineup of DWill, Mobley (or Miles), AK, Boozer and Kaman with a bench of Price, Miles, Korver, Milsap and Collins or Fesenko. Mobley is a little older and a little overpaid, but tough.

I could see this paying great dividends for us, but there is some risk here as well.
carrottop12
RealGM
Posts: 21,602
And1: 30
Joined: Oct 10, 2006
Location: why you take out my sig for?

 

Post#2 » by carrottop12 » Mon May 19, 2008 4:09 pm

I like Kaman, and Brevin Knight would be a solid back up, but you have to realize the Jazz would be the one's giving up more talent in this trade which the Jazz don't want to do.

Unless the Jazz are getting an obvious right off the back improvement the chances they make a move are slim.
JDubJazz
Analyst
Posts: 3,156
And1: 4
Joined: Jun 19, 2005
Location: along for the ride
       

 

Post#3 » by JDubJazz » Mon May 19, 2008 4:49 pm

I don't like the trade at all. Kaman had one "good" year, and his team still lost a ton of games. Brevin Knight is useless. I'd much rather keep Okur, Brew and Almond.
--J-Dub--
User avatar
gonnadunkonU
Pro Prospect
Posts: 848
And1: 1
Joined: May 15, 2007
Location: Park City, Utah

 

Post#4 » by gonnadunkonU » Mon May 19, 2008 5:07 pm

I don't know how much of an improvement Kaman would be over Okur. Our interior D would improve a bit but we'd really miss Memo's ability to take the other team's big man out of the paint with his outside shooting.
troy
Junior
Posts: 467
And1: 1
Joined: Dec 03, 2003

 

Post#5 » by troy » Mon May 19, 2008 5:14 pm

I don't like the trade at all. Kaman had one "good" year, and his team still lost a ton of games. Brevin Knight is useless. I'd much rather keep Okur, Brew and Almond.


Kaman didn't have only one good year. He has been playing solid basketball for the past three years especially this year and two years ago. He has outrebounded (per minute) Brand in his past three years.
The fact that his team lost so many games is irrelevant. As far as i know Utah won only 26 games two years ago with Kirilenko , Boozer and Okur...

Kaman has never played with a point guard like Deron. With him he could become a scary player. He will never put up numbers like Boozer but he can defintiely have a bigger impact than him or Okur because he is a way way better defender and offensively he doesn't leave the paint (unlike Boozer and Okur who love jumpshots) and can get a real inside/outside game going.

Boozer would be terrific next to Kaman because nobody will be able to double team him anymore .

I would do that trade in a heartbeat. This is a trade that can bring a championship to Utah i'm sure of it.
Like i said in another thread , Okur is not a true center. Kaman is just that. What i like the most about him is that he is a tough player.

It's often said that you team needs to adapt its game to its star player. The Nash's Suns played with quickness ,shooting ability and do not defend. . The Duncan's Spurs plays with smarts , toughness , patience and great defense , the Paul's Hornets play with athleticism and intensity.

In our case we have a star that is the most powerful at its position. Deron is a tank , he is a very tough , physical player and he plays D. I would surround him with physical player that takes pride on D and hustle plays.
Kaman is one of those players.

Right now everybody is saying that Utah is a physical team , but aside from Millsap, Deron and Harpring nobody plays really physical.
Let's give them what they want , birng Kaman to our team and we will show the world what players like Kaman and Deron can do in the playoffs.
User avatar
DelaneyRudd
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 104,524
And1: 9,462
Joined: Nov 17, 2006
     

 

Post#6 » by DelaneyRudd » Mon May 19, 2008 8:19 pm

Don't like it at all. Memo/Kaman is reasonable, and LA would need a sweetener, but the likely lotto pick should be enough. Don't include Brew.
HouseofBoozer
Junior
Posts: 318
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 20, 2007

 

Post#7 » by HouseofBoozer » Mon May 19, 2008 10:24 pm

I don't like that move at all. We are giving up two starters and a potential high up lottery pick for Kaman. I definitely don't think he's worth that much. Plus KOC always says he won't make a deal unless it makes our team better. Kaman would be a good pick up for the team, but we're giving up way too much.
User avatar
scoopy
Sophomore
Posts: 189
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 21, 2005

 

Post#8 » by scoopy » Mon May 19, 2008 10:47 pm

I think getting rid of the main piece of our offense that is able to spread a big off of Boozer is a terrible idea. We saw how effective Boozer was vs. a constantly crowded lane.
troy
Junior
Posts: 467
And1: 1
Joined: Dec 03, 2003

 

Post#9 » by troy » Tue May 20, 2008 4:10 am

I think getting rid of the main piece of our offense that is able to spread a big off of Boozer is a terrible idea. We saw how effective Boozer was vs. a constantly crowded lane.


Okur spreading of the floor for Boozer is completely overrated. Anyway why is Boozer spending more and more time on the perimeter , Okur musn't be that effective then.

People thought that Stoudemire and Shaq would bother each other but it was the other way around.
If Boozer has somebody next to him that is a good finisher inside and a very good offensive rebounder , it's impossible for the offensive team to double either one of them.
If they double him he would just have to dump it to Kaman who would get the dunk or the free throw.

To win in the nba you win an inside outside game. Both our bigs spends too much time on the perimeter , so that inside outside game is not there anymore. With Kaman we would have somebody that can play in the paint non stop and the opponent would always have to guard the basket. That would make Boozer's jumper way more effective and the defense wouldn't be able to crowd him because there is a seven footer with good hands waiting under the basket.
Okur's spreading is great but points in the paint > three pointers any time .
Pappyman
Junior
Posts: 321
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 16, 2006

how about this one? 

Post#10 » by Pappyman » Tue May 20, 2008 7:17 am

Successful Trade Scenario
Congratulations on a successful trade.

Due to Utah and L.A. Clippers being over the cap, the 25% trade rule is invoked. Utah and L.A. Clippers had to be no more than 125% plus $100,000 of the salary given out for the trade to be accepted, which did happen here. This trade satisfies the provisions of the Collective Bargaining Agreement.
Trade ID
Trade ID #4603303

Every trade made by fans is allocated a unique Trade ID which you can share with friends and fellow basketball fans to allow them to see your trade scenario.

Try Another Trade or visit our Trade Forum.
Utah Trade Breakdown
Change in Team Outlook: +10.5 ppg, +8.3 rpg, and +1.8 apg.
Incoming Players
Chris Kaman
7-0 C from Central Michigan
15.7 ppg, 12.7 rpg, 1.9 apg in 37.2 minutes
Tim Thomas
6-10 SF / PF from Villanova
12.4 ppg, 5.2 rpg, 2.7 apg in 30.8 minutes
Outgoing Players
Mehmet Okur
6-11 PF from Turkey (Foreign)
14.5 ppg, 7.7 rpg, 2.0 apg in 33.0 minutes
Jarron Collins
6-11 PF / C from Stanford
1.7 ppg, 1.7 rpg, 0.5 apg in 10.0 minutes
Morris Almond
6-6 SG from Rice
1.4 ppg, 0.2 rpg, 0.3 apg in 4.4 minutes

L.A. Clippers Trade Breakdown
Change in Team Outlook: -10.5 ppg, -8.3 rpg, and -1.8 apg.
Incoming Players
Mehmet Okur
6-11 PF from Turkey (Foreign)
14.5 ppg, 7.7 rpg, 2.0 apg in 33.0 minutes
Jarron Collins
6-11 PF / C from Stanford
1.7 ppg, 1.7 rpg, 0.5 apg in 10.0 minutes
Morris Almond
6-6 SG from Rice
1.4 ppg, 0.2 rpg, 0.3 apg in 4.4 minutes
Outgoing Players
Chris Kaman
7-0 C from Central Michigan
15.7 ppg, 12.7 rpg, 1.9 apg in 37.2 minutes
Tim Thomas
6-10 SF / PF from Villanova
12.4 ppg, 5.2 rpg, 2.7 apg in 30.8 minutes

Depth Chart:
PG: Deron Williams, Ronnie Price, 2nd Round Draft Pick
SG: Ronnie Brewer, Kyle Korver, C.J. Miles
SF: Andrei Kirilenko, Matt Harpring/Tim Thomas
PF: Carlos Boozer, Paul Millsap/Tim Thomas
C: Chris Kaman, 1st round Pick/Paul Millsap, Kyrylo Fesenko

Reasons:
Would clear up the shooting guard situation. It would give us the defensive center that we need. It would also add a piece in Tim Thomas that can play small forward or power forward. A draft pick or two would probably have to be included for the Clippers to go for it. We would probably have to give up the NY pick.
JStockLivesOn
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 4,410
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 07, 2007

 

Post#11 » by JStockLivesOn » Tue May 20, 2008 8:28 am

To be honest, I wouldn't even do a straight swap of Kaman for Okur. In my opinion, the trades listed have the Jazz giving up way, way too much for him. He's a nice player, but I'll take the durable, likable, clutch, and consistently improving Memo.
Image
"Let it be said by our children's children that when we were tested, we refused to let this journey end, that we did not turn back nor did we falter."
jozef
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,762
And1: 137
Joined: Oct 29, 2001
Location: Slovakia
Contact:

 

Post#12 » by jozef » Tue May 20, 2008 11:01 am

You must be kidding.
Kaman's top blocks and rebounds and skills...
No way Clippers would do it straight.
I should be on Lacob payroll...
dr0welf
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,770
And1: 793
Joined: Jun 16, 2007
     

 

Post#13 » by dr0welf » Wed May 21, 2008 2:19 am

I'm not a Kaman fan so I would say no thank you. And I would love to see Morris Almond get some minutes. I know D League is different then real NBA but he has a ton of potential and I would like to see him realize it in a Jazz uniform.

Return to Utah Jazz