Trade for Kaman or Love or both

london sonic · Post #1 » by **london sonic** » Wed Nov 10, 2010 12:29 pm

OKC have the assets to trade for either or both of these players. I feel both would help this team. What does the board think.

BIG EDDIE · Post #2 » by **BIG EDDIE** » Wed Nov 10, 2010 2:06 pm

Completely agree. Both Kaman and Love would be great for this team.
I would actually prefer Kaman, just because he can play C.
I dont know how that would work salary wise, but we could trade JGreen and Krstic for Kaman. Then our lineup would look like this:

PF - Ibaka/Collison
SF - Durant/Thabo
C - Kaman/Aldrich
SG - Harden/Cook
PG - Westbrook/Maynor

Yoshi2kx · Post #3 » by **Yoshi2kx** » Wed Nov 10, 2010 5:48 pm

No, no, no, no, no!

NOT Kaman. Kaman is just plain AWFUL the guy puts up empty "Good" stats on bad teams. On the offensive end, he makes horrible decisions by attempting horrible passes/shots and on top of that doesnt even impact the boards/defensive end well. Trust me, you do NOT want Kaman

Bumi · Post #4 » by **Bumi** » Wed Nov 10, 2010 6:24 pm

Michael Beasley, because he'd be a relatively easy get, and another big.

HeartSouloma · Post #5 » by **HeartSouloma** » Wed Nov 10, 2010 10:08 pm

Bumi wrote:Michael Beasley, because he'd be a relatively easy get, and another big.

I agree. And as for Kaman i don't want. I rather trade for Deandre Jordan now thats the guy i would take.

Post #6 » by **slick_watts** » Wed Nov 10, 2010 10:11 pm

Kevin Love would be nice, but I'd avoid Chris Kaman unless he comes real cheap.

NewWolvesOrder · Post #7 » by **NewWolvesOrder** » Wed Nov 10, 2010 10:28 pm

Bumi wrote:Michael Beasley, because he'd be a relatively easy get, and another big.

Would you do Beasley for Harden?

Post #8 » by **slick_watts** » Wed Nov 10, 2010 10:32 pm

Yoshi2kx wrote:No, no, no, no, no!

NOT Kaman. Kaman is just plain AWFUL the guy puts up empty "Good" stats on bad teams. On the offensive end, he makes horrible decisions by attempting horrible passes/shots and on top of that doesnt even impact the boards/defensive end well. Trust me, you do NOT want Kaman

Agree. Kaman's a bit of a chucker. I don't think he's a bad player, but I wouldn't take him for anything more than expirings.

Turnover_21 wrote:
Bumi wrote:Michael Beasley, because he'd be a relatively easy get, and another big.

Would you do Beasley for Harden?

No. Michael Beasley's not a good fit for us, might as well just keep Jeff Green at PF.

fallacy · Post #9 » by **fallacy** » Wed Nov 10, 2010 10:41 pm

Love, yes

Kaman, **** no

Yoshi2kx · Post #10 » by **Yoshi2kx** » Thu Nov 11, 2010 3:05 am

Beasley is just as terribad

dude takes 20 shots to score 20 points, doesnt rebound as well as he should, doesn't pass, doesn't defend.

Seriously guys. Seriously.

Envelopes · Post #11 » by **Envelopes** » Tue Nov 16, 2010 2:39 pm

I wouldn't think Beasley or Love would be available.

You would think Kaman could be had, but is he that much of an upgrade for what we have to give up? or is he available for Collison/Krstic?

mg · Post #12 » by mg » Tue Nov 16, 2010 10:20 pm

This team could use a big that will do the dirty work and can defend the Lakers big men. Noah or even Varejao would be very nice but neither one would come cheap...I doubt the Bulls would even consider trading Noah. Kaman and Love put up big numbers but neither one is a good defender or a proven winner.