MiamiHavok wrote:The worst thing that could happen to the thunder (besides Durant going down) and the best thing that could happen to Durant.
Sucks about Westbrook guys, good luck in the west
What's so good about exploding his turnover rate?
Moderators: Dadouv47, retrobro90
MiamiHavok wrote:The worst thing that could happen to the thunder (besides Durant going down) and the best thing that could happen to Durant.
Sucks about Westbrook guys, good luck in the west
bbms wrote:This will put a huge pressure on Durant.
While it's safe to assume Durant won't be playing 48 minutes each game, those numbers round down to 34.9 points, 7.6 rebounds, 3.8 assists and 2.2 blocks when modified to fit his usual 39.1 minutes per game. It's worth mentioning that Durant's current 26.9 PER spikes to a ridiculous 37.9 when playing at the 4.
sonictecture wrote:I think Brooks could play those players together, but he isn't going to make such drastic changes to start the game. Brooks is a consistency guy, so he'll plug Jackson in and ask Fisher to play point and Martin gets more minutes.
Brooks would surprise me if he gave Lamb minutes.
BirdmanPresents wrote:sonictecture wrote:I think Brooks could play those players together, but he isn't going to make such drastic changes to start the game. Brooks is a consistency guy, so he'll plug Jackson in and ask Fisher to play point and Martin gets more minutes.
Brooks would surprise me if he gave Lamb minutes.
I agree with what your saying 100% , but disagree with Brooks strategy. One of his biggest problems thus far has been his inability to adjust the lineups or get his rookies some burn. Lamb was regarded as one of the top SG of the draft and he could of been in a position to take some of the scoring load with WB out. I just find he doesn't use the best of his resources and likes to stick to consistency over mixing things up. Consistency = predictable.
BirdmanPresents wrote:sonictecture wrote:I think Brooks could play those players together, but he isn't going to make such drastic changes to start the game. Brooks is a consistency guy, so he'll plug Jackson in and ask Fisher to play point and Martin gets more minutes.
Brooks would surprise me if he gave Lamb minutes.
I agree with what your saying 100% , but disagree with Brooks strategy. One of his biggest problems thus far has been his inability to adjust the lineups or get his rookies some burn. Lamb was regarded as one of the top SG of the draft and he could of been in a position to take some of the scoring load with WB out. I just find he doesn't use the best of his resources and likes to stick to consistency over mixing things up. Consistency = predictable.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
SmartWentCrazy wrote:It's extremely unlikely that they end up in the top 3.They're probably better off trying to win and giving Philly the 8th pick than tanking and giving them the 4th.
bondom34 wrote:BirdmanPresents wrote:sonictecture wrote:I think Brooks could play those players together, but he isn't going to make such drastic changes to start the game. Brooks is a consistency guy, so he'll plug Jackson in and ask Fisher to play point and Martin gets more minutes.
Brooks would surprise me if he gave Lamb minutes.
I agree with what your saying 100% , but disagree with Brooks strategy. One of his biggest problems thus far has been his inability to adjust the lineups or get his rookies some burn. Lamb was regarded as one of the top SG of the draft and he could of been in a position to take some of the scoring load with WB out. I just find he doesn't use the best of his resources and likes to stick to consistency over mixing things up. Consistency = predictable.
To an extent, I see what you are saying as far as predictability goes. However, you also have to realize that with the main guys on this team, its not as easy to just pull a guy and play a rookie. You have to find when and where it can be done, and I think Brooks has found his spots where he can play the younger players. Jackson became a much larger member of the team than I would have expected, and I'm actually more excited/anxious to see tonights game just to see how he plays when it a bigger game.
My main problem with the lineups is just pretty much Fisher, which I think everyone agrees is a problem. Brooks has played only 2 lineups for 250 plus minutes on the season (not surprising considering Durant/WB take a lot of minutes, plus Ibaka and Martin as a solid 6th man). However he played 7 for at least 60 minutes, which is one of the higher numbers in the league (Spurs, Clips and Heat played around the same amount), which to me says he at least has tried to get guys in where they can. I think now is the test of how they've developed, and in a way it is kind of a positive to be able to evaluate players in real game situations before any decisions on contracts need to be made. We will actually see how the young guys respond and if they'll hang around, which wouldn't have happened as much otherwise.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
Desiderium wrote:This season man...no rose, no rondo, no Kobe and now no Westbrook. This season needs a giant asterisks by it.
JordansBulls wrote:Desiderium wrote:This season man...no rose, no rondo, no Kobe and now no Westbrook. This season needs a giant asterisks by it.
Last year was similar. Both Rose and Dwight two arguably top 5 players in the East were out the entire playoffs which enabled Miami to get to the finals.
Return to Oklahoma City Thunder