Post#45 » by Kizz Fastfists » Fri Aug 22, 2014 4:00 pm
Monroe has already said he will sign the QO over a long-term deal with Detroit. The question is at what point does a team view it not worth it work out a S&T and try to sign him outright next off-season. A team like Boston is better off not trading for him. OKC would have to trade for him if they wanted him, because they will not be able to offer him more than the MLE. If you are OKC what is it really worth to add Monroe, go over the cap now, and lock yourself in as a repeater in a few years?
If you sign Monroe you are probably going to be forced to let Ibaka go in two years, unless you trade Monroe before that. OKC won't be affording four max contracts. Monroe would be a short-term boost, but it would also cut OKC's window to two years. If you believe KD is going to leave for an inferior team when he hits FA you have to trade for Monroe because it makes you slightly better today and much worse in two years. If you believe KD will stay and the process is working you can not consider Monroe. OKC can't afford the repeater tax which means you are giving up almost any chance of extending Reggie, Ibaka and Adams by trading for Monroe.
OKC is good enough to win a championship as the team sits. So there is no reason to impose a short time frame on yourself by adding Monroe. The cost for Monroe would be something around Reggie, McGary and Perkins in addition to being in the luxury tax. Replacing Reggie is the easy part. McGary is relatively irrelevant to THIS season. Monroe is better than Perkins offensively, although inferior on defense, but overall a very solid upgrade. Monroe, on a max contract, would make more than Perkins, Reggie and McGary combined. Then the Thunder would have to fill the roster spots adding more salary.
If Monroe will sign for $10M/yr then it is a whole different conversation. However, since everything reported has been he wants a max contract to be a starting a center it makes him an almost impossible fit for OKC. Next off-season you lose Collison, assuming he's going to retire due to age and decline, and Thabeet. You add Huestis, Pleiss and possibly a draft pick to the roster to replace them. You can spend the tax payers MLE, but how big of a tax bill can OKC take on?
Then for 2016-2017 you have to re-sign KD and have to make decisions on Lamb and PJ3 which probably means not matching their RFA offers. Morrow is on a team option so they could shed a little salary there also. However, it is almost impossible for them not to be in the tax for a 3rd year. That means the next year they have to shed serious payroll or be a repeat offender. That means letting one of Westbrook and Ibaka go and probably not matching any RFA offers on Adams, who is probably a better center at that point than Monroe. You can't let Westbrook go so you let Ibaka and Adams go and have no rim protector, except Pleiss, and you are seriously lacking depth and quality as you have had to shed salary to afford three max players for the last three years along with Ibaka's $12M.
"The secret to success is to offend the greatest number of people." -George Bernard Shaw