spearsy23 wrote:M2J wrote:His shot selection wasn't that bad. . . no worse than Paul's. . .the problem was the open shots and dunks they both missed. They got open jumpers & weren't executing well. I never said he played great and neither did anyone else here at all, nor, was anyone "stanning". Another attempt to change the subject in order to promote this HeManMeloHaters Club specifically Spearsy and Bondom, which is dumb based on the fact that any hopes this team has is based off of all of them playing their games and contributing and it's a campaign that no one of relevance agrees with or cares about as will be illustrated at the end of the season when he gets what he wants.
So to clarify this topic came about from me saying how big of a deal it was and easy it makes it to have 3 guys that can take over at times of each game. . .then referenced an idiotic conversation where the before mentioned stated that OKC would be better off without Melo and with Patterson taking these shots. Of course showcasing a clear lack of knowledge...because Patterson or Robeson together aren't capable of getting off 20 decent quality shots unless left wide open. Maybe the majority of players aren't on a regular basis capable of that, without taking quick transition jumpers. Then of course instead of staying on topic, and owning up to this foolishness, it becomes about a bad early start and rare mention of the strong finish on both ends and I'll let you continue that
Your boy played a bad game and you claimed it was the reason for the easy win. It's all still there for everyone to read.
Everyone without reading comprehension
That's you
