Moderators: retrobro90, Dadouv47
Dn4sty wrote:bondom34 wrote:Dn4sty wrote:
Why Burks over Hood? Both have been injury prone. Is it just a money situation?
Mostly, an deense.
How much does Hood really get? I can easily see a contract similar to TJ Warren
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
bondom34 wrote:Dn4sty wrote:bondom34 wrote:Mostly, an deense.
How much does Hood really get? I can easily see a contract similar to TJ Warren
Probably, and neither are really that good. Burks is probably better and cheaper.
Dn4sty wrote:bondom34 wrote:Dn4sty wrote:
How much does Hood really get? I can easily see a contract similar to TJ Warren
Probably, and neither are really that good. Burks is probably better and cheaper.
I guess I’m not seeing Burks as better. What am I missing?
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
Knrstz wrote:The appeal of Hood is we could control him long term.
Rodney Hood may not be with the Utah Jazz for the long haul.
Multiple league sources tell The Tribune that the Jazz have increased efforts to move the shooting guard before the NBA’s Feb. 8 trade deadline, and there is enough interest throughout the league that Hood likely will be with another team for the remainder of the season.
With the deadline a little less than two weeks away, Hood joins starting big man Derrick Favors as Jazz players who are available.
Hood is averaging a career-high 16.7 points per game this season. He’s shooting 38.6 percent from 3-point range, and he’s shooting 41.3 percent overall.
But Hood, who views himself as an starter, was sent to the bench for Donovan Mitchell earlier in the season. He’s missed nine games with various injuries, and his status as a restricted free agent this summer elicits uncertainty over his long term future.
Pillendreher wrote:Rodney Hood may not be with the Utah Jazz for the long haul.
Multiple league sources tell The Tribune that the Jazz have increased efforts to move the shooting guard before the NBA’s Feb. 8 trade deadline, and there is enough interest throughout the league that Hood likely will be with another team for the remainder of the season.
With the deadline a little less than two weeks away, Hood joins starting big man Derrick Favors as Jazz players who are available.
Hood is averaging a career-high 16.7 points per game this season. He’s shooting 38.6 percent from 3-point range, and he’s shooting 41.3 percent overall.
But Hood, who views himself as an starter, was sent to the bench for Donovan Mitchell earlier in the season. He’s missed nine games with various injuries, and his status as a restricted free agent this summer elicits uncertainty over his long term future.
https://www.sltrib.com/sports/jazz/2018/01/20/jazz-looking-to-trade-rodney-hood-before-nbas-deadline/
We need to get in on this. I'd take either one, although I think Favors might help us more. Depends on if we could get an SG to come off the bench and draw fouls in any other way.
retrobro90 wrote:Pillendreher wrote:Rodney Hood may not be with the Utah Jazz for the long haul.
Multiple league sources tell The Tribune that the Jazz have increased efforts to move the shooting guard before the NBA’s Feb. 8 trade deadline, and there is enough interest throughout the league that Hood likely will be with another team for the remainder of the season.
With the deadline a little less than two weeks away, Hood joins starting big man Derrick Favors as Jazz players who are available.
Hood is averaging a career-high 16.7 points per game this season. He’s shooting 38.6 percent from 3-point range, and he’s shooting 41.3 percent overall.
But Hood, who views himself as an starter, was sent to the bench for Donovan Mitchell earlier in the season. He’s missed nine games with various injuries, and his status as a restricted free agent this summer elicits uncertainty over his long term future.
https://www.sltrib.com/sports/jazz/2018/01/20/jazz-looking-to-trade-rodney-hood-before-nbas-deadline/
We need to get in on this. I'd take either one, although I think Favors might help us more. Depends on if we could get an SG to come off the bench and draw fouls in any other way.
Would rather Hood than Favors I think. Favors is a good player but we need dudes that can run to fit our identity. I don't trust his mobility in transition or his ability to switch. I think a bench wing is the most glaring weakness for us. Grant isn't the best backup C by a long stretch but i'll be damned if either Huestis or Ferguson see playoff minutes.
Worm122 wrote:Can the Thunder fit George Hill contract? He can play pg and sg for the Thunder and send Robertson to hell hahahah
Enviado do meu iPhone usando RealGM Forums
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
Pillendreher wrote:
But Hood, who views himself as an starter.
https://www.sltrib.com/sports/jazz/2018/01/20/jazz-looking-to-trade-rodney-hood-before-nbas-deadline/
We need to get in on this. I'd take either one, although I think Favors might help us more. Depends on if we could get an SG to come off the bench and draw fouls in any other way.
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
Knrstz wrote:Would Presti consider trading a future frp? Is it just too risky to do so at this point?
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
spearsy23 wrote:Knrstz wrote:Would Presti consider trading a future frp? Is it just too risky to do so at this point?
I think we're to the point where future firsts are far enough out that Russ (and PG if he stays) will have declined so much that you're looking at giving away lotto picks.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
Knrstz wrote:spearsy23 wrote:Knrstz wrote:Would Presti consider trading a future frp? Is it just too risky to do so at this point?
I think we're to the point where future firsts are far enough out that Russ (and PG if he stays) will have declined so much that you're looking at giving away lotto picks.
That’s one issue. Obviously I don’t expect the picks to be unprotected. The other issue is how many GMs feel secure enough in their job to trade for a frp that far out? A lot of them know they might be making the job a lot easier for the next guy.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
spearsy23 wrote:Pillendreher wrote:
But Hood, who views himself as an starter.
https://www.sltrib.com/sports/jazz/2018/01/20/jazz-looking-to-trade-rodney-hood-before-nbas-deadline/
We need to get in on this. I'd take either one, although I think Favors might help us more. Depends on if we could get an SG to come off the bench and draw fouls in any other way.
The above is troubling. He shouldn't be starting over robes either.
yb90 wrote:Hood and Jerebko would probably be the best cheap deal OKC could do.
Pillendreher wrote:yb90 wrote:Hood and Jerebko would probably be the best cheap deal OKC could do.
What is Hood's value really? You get a guy who you can have under contract for multiple following years, although you might be forced to overpay him. He's injured like every 10 games or so and misses multiple games each season because of it. With reports coming out about him wanting to start, you have to wonder if there would be a chemistry problem with him coming off the bench.
Do you give up on Ferguson for him? Is Utah asking for more? Is anybody offering more?
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
Return to Oklahoma City Thunder
