2/1 - 9:30PM CST | G52: Oklahoma City Thunder at Denver Nuggets

Moderators: Dadouv47, retrobro90

User avatar
Funcrusher
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,084
And1: 6,569
Joined: Apr 14, 2017
Location: Stolen from Africa
     

Re: 2/1 - 9:30PM CST | G52: Oklahoma City Thunder at Denver Nuggets 

Post#141 » by Funcrusher » Fri Feb 2, 2018 6:11 am

slick_watts wrote:
BobThunder wrote:
slick_watts wrote:
i guess it was george's man who ended up wide open with 1.4 seconds left?


Okay, you're trolling, no more of this. Thank you very much.


i'm not trolling but i don't think you're going to take anything i say at face value anyway so what's the point?

I don't even know what you're saying right now, and your arrogance is just stunning. The only thing I'm disputing is your cartoonish cynicism and over exaggeration of Westbrook's flaws. You're really painting a me against the world portrait here.
gh123 wrote:Zion lucky if he gets 18 ppg on decent efficiency. Midget big man is a no-career in NBA. Chuck being the only wonder. Zion is the next Tractor Trailer at best.
User avatar
Pillendreher
RealGM
Posts: 14,191
And1: 9,953
Joined: Jan 25, 2015
 

Re: RE: Re: 2/1 - 9:30PM CST | G52: Oklahoma City Thunder at Denver Nuggets 

Post#142 » by Pillendreher » Fri Feb 2, 2018 7:59 am

Atomic Punk wrote:
slick_watts wrote:
Atomic Punk wrote:I thought that there was no such thing as “hot” shooting. I seem to recall you referring to the hot hand “theory” more than once.


i simply mean variance. a 33% shooter doesn't go 1/3 every game. the hot hand theory suggests that making a shot improves the odds of making more shots, all else being equal. i disagree with that.


So Melo had a streak of “hot” shooting but didn’t have the “hot” hand? You literally argue against your own positions when it suits the current narrative you are peddling.

Are you seriously this stupid? He just explained the difference between variance and the assumption that making shots increases the probability of making shots.
"I don't know of any player that, when the shot goes up, he doesn't want it to go in," Donovan said
Andre Roberstan
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 10,521
And1: 6,859
Joined: Jun 23, 2015
Contact:
   

Re: 2/1 - 9:30PM CST | G52: Oklahoma City Thunder at Denver Nuggets 

Post#143 » by Andre Roberstan » Fri Feb 2, 2018 8:02 am

Can everyone in here chill? At least a little?

I have to go to bed. Don't kill each other while I'm gone. My job>>>>this board.
Image
Atomic Punk
Pro Prospect
Posts: 874
And1: 328
Joined: Jul 03, 2017
Location: Earth

Re: RE: Re: 2/1 - 9:30PM CST | G52: Oklahoma City Thunder at Denver Nuggets 

Post#144 » by Atomic Punk » Fri Feb 2, 2018 2:18 pm

Pillendreher wrote:
Atomic Punk wrote:
slick_watts wrote:
i simply mean variance. a 33% shooter doesn't go 1/3 every game. the hot hand theory suggests that making a shot improves the odds of making more shots, all else being equal. i disagree with that.


So Melo had a streak of “hot” shooting but didn’t have the “hot” hand? You literally argue against your own positions when it suits the current narrative you are peddling.

Are you seriously this stupid? He just explained the difference between variance and the assumption that making shots increases the probability of making shots.


Do you seriously care what I think? Why is is so important for you to be right?

Return to Oklahoma City Thunder