bondom34 wrote:And KCP isn't that good. Not close to Roberson.
Sure he is. Better at alot of things, worse at some too.
Moderators: Dadouv47, retrobro90
bondom34 wrote:And KCP isn't that good. Not close to Roberson.

hardenASG13 wrote:bondom34 wrote:And KCP isn't that good. Not close to Roberson.
Sure he is. Better at alot of things, worse at some too.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
slick_watts wrote:Andre Roberstan wrote:slick_watts wrote:
it's actually worse than this article states. if you incorporate the games andre roberson missed prior to the rupture, the thunder defense is dead last.
offensively, there's a thing not mentioned here: opponent turnovers. a reduction of opponent turnovers = a reduction in easy points or favorable cross matchups.
with andre roberson playing with the starters, the thunder opponent tov% is 16.4. that wouldn't only be first place among all teams this year by a mile, but also #1 for any 5-man lineup that has played 200 minutes in the last three seasons.
the same group without roberson has an opponent tov% of 11.5, which would be 29th in the league this season. that's a lot of lost opportunities for the offense.
Not to mention higher opponent TOV allows you to get out in transition, mitigating a below-average halfcourt offense.
the tov% differential is just bizarre. if you take all this at face value at the moment, andre roberson comes out looking like one of the best defensive non-big men of the last 20 years. it's probably skewed a bit by our particular roster construction and house of cards defensive philosophy but still. is there another non-big man you take away from a team like this and drop off so severely?




Return to Oklahoma City Thunder