slick_watts wrote:spearsy23 wrote:I'm not even sure what you're attempting to take issue with since you didn't add anything to the discussion, the idea that schroder and Westbrook play basically the same game is not novel or unique.
i take issue with the idea that if schroder just had westbrook's playmaking ability he would essentially be westbrook. just to name one thing, you would be missing the transition element where westbrook led the league by a wide margin in possessions per game (nearly 1/4 of his total possessions used) while transition accounted for only 7.3% of schroder's offensive possessions. then you have FTr where westbrook also blows him away.
yeah they have a couple things alike, they are high usage scorers who can't make threes. it does not follow that schroder + westbrook's playmaking = westbrook. that's a lazy comparison.spearsy23 wrote: If schroder was capable of manipulating a defense the same way Russ is they'd be pretty much the same guy offensively.
what does this even mean? you said play making. now you are saying manipulating a defense. and imo neither of these even touches on the primary difference offensively between the two. you're off base here.
Do you consider playmaking only his ability to generate assists? If so that's where we're differing, I consider playmaking to be a broad term that encompasses ability to generate offense. Westbrook's transition and drawing abilities are closely tied to his playmaking (i.e. his individual ability to create offense), and are what make him a better playmaker than a Rubio who is a better pure passer.
This board is better when you actually wanna have a conversation as opposed to showing off your basketball acumen.













