2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion
Moderators: retrobro90, Dadouv47
Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion
- ThunderBolt
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 19,358
- And1: 19,201
- Joined: Dec 29, 2016
- Location: Lynnwood, WA
-
Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion
I think Dipo is definitely gone. As far as Enes, I'm not sure that Presti couldn't get a decent return for him. No one would have thought we could have gotten much of anything for the three we just traded. It's just my personal opinion but someone will want Kanter. Yes his defense sucks but his offense is second to none. Someone will bite. I'm just not sure how we will turn those two into anything that allows us to win now. When you're trying to win now but I have no cash, you're kind of screwed. Meanwhile, Golden state has 4 all stars and is better off from financially than us.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion
-
Kizz Fastfists
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,435
- And1: 1,867
- Joined: Jun 05, 2014
-
Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion
Andre Roberstan wrote:Someone has to go. It could be Russ. It could be Steven. Neither are likely. So that leaves Enes and Dipo, and there are too many offense-first bigs on the market for Enes to get a decent return.
The problem is that without Dipo OKC probably isn't a playoff team next year. So if they are going to get rid of Dipo they might as well trade Russ and Dipo on draft night and get the rebuild off to a good start. I'd get whatever I could for Kanter, also. I'd keep Adams to fill the Perkins role for the rebuild.
"The secret to success is to offend the greatest number of people." -George Bernard Shaw
Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion
- bondom34
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 66,716
- And1: 50,290
- Joined: Mar 01, 2013
Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion
Kizz Fastfists wrote:Andre Roberstan wrote:Someone has to go. It could be Russ. It could be Steven. Neither are likely. So that leaves Enes and Dipo, and there are too many offense-first bigs on the market for Enes to get a decent return.
The problem is that without Dipo OKC probably isn't a playoff team next year. So if they are going to get rid of Dipo they might as well trade Russ and Dipo on draft night and get the rebuild off to a good start. I'd get whatever I could for Kanter, also. I'd keep Adams to fill the Perkins role for the rebuild.
This feels like a stretch. It would be a hit, but unless you're trading him and not getting back any talent you're still looking at a playoff team.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion
- bondom34
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 66,716
- And1: 50,290
- Joined: Mar 01, 2013
Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion
Andre Roberstan wrote:Pillendreher wrote:Andre Roberstan wrote:
Assets don't necessarily equal no immediate help.
what assets would that be? Those trades always end up being quality for quantity. That's what I mean by 'the cycle'. We have done this multiple times already and it has come back to bite us almost every single time.
Barring unprecedented growth from one of our other pieces, we're looking at being capped out and possibly in the 2018–19 repeater tax for a 6-7 seed team next year, with 2 RFAs coming up for a payday.
Someone has to go. It could be Russ. It could be Steven. Neither are likely. So that leaves Enes and Dipo, and there are too many offense-first bigs on the market for Enes to get a decent return.
We've done this twice. The first time it was Harden. Presti jumped too early.
The second time it was Jackson. Presti jumped too late.
Hopefully this third time he falls in the middle.
Just remembered but 18-19 is Enes's player option. He's almost for sure opting out. So there's 18 mil off the books.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion
-
Andre Roberstan
- Forum Mod

- Posts: 10,529
- And1: 6,868
- Joined: Jun 23, 2015
- Contact:
-
Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion
bondom34 wrote:Andre Roberstan wrote:Pillendreher wrote:
what assets would that be? Those trades always end up being quality for quantity. That's what I mean by 'the cycle'. We have done this multiple times already and it has come back to bite us almost every single time.
Barring unprecedented growth from one of our other pieces, we're looking at being capped out and possibly in the 2018–19 repeater tax for a 6-7 seed team next year, with 2 RFAs coming up for a payday.
Someone has to go. It could be Russ. It could be Steven. Neither are likely. So that leaves Enes and Dipo, and there are too many offense-first bigs on the market for Enes to get a decent return.
We've done this twice. The first time it was Harden. Presti jumped too early.
The second time it was Jackson. Presti jumped too late.
Hopefully this third time he falls in the middle.
Just remembered but 18-19 is Enes's player option. He's almost for sure opting out. So there's 18 mil off the books.
Is he?
Cap space is going to be largely dried up by that point, and we're in the midst of a huge big man surplus right now.
Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion
- bondom34
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 66,716
- And1: 50,290
- Joined: Mar 01, 2013
Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion
Andre Roberstan wrote:bondom34 wrote:Andre Roberstan wrote:
Barring unprecedented growth from one of our other pieces, we're looking at being capped out and possibly in the 2018–19 repeater tax for a 6-7 seed team next year, with 2 RFAs coming up for a payday.
Someone has to go. It could be Russ. It could be Steven. Neither are likely. So that leaves Enes and Dipo, and there are too many offense-first bigs on the market for Enes to get a decent return.
We've done this twice. The first time it was Harden. Presti jumped too early.
The second time it was Jackson. Presti jumped too late.
Hopefully this third time he falls in the middle.
Just remembered but 18-19 is Enes's player option. He's almost for sure opting out. So there's 18 mil off the books.
Is he?
Cap space is going to be largely dried up by that point, and we're in the midst of a huge big man surplus right now.
I'd be shocked if he didn't. Bigs are still getting paid like mad and at 18 mil he'd almost for sure be able to lock up a long term deal at a slightly higher pay level.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion
- ThunderBolt
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 19,358
- And1: 19,201
- Joined: Dec 29, 2016
- Location: Lynnwood, WA
-
Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion
Kizz Fastfists wrote:Andre Roberstan wrote:Someone has to go. It could be Russ. It could be Steven. Neither are likely. So that leaves Enes and Dipo, and there are too many offense-first bigs on the market for Enes to get a decent return.
The problem is that without Dipo OKC probably isn't a playoff team next year. So if they are going to get rid of Dipo they might as well trade Russ and Dipo on draft night and get the rebuild off to a good start. I'd get whatever I could for Kanter, also. I'd keep Adams to fill the Perkins role for the rebuild.
It all depends on what they get for him.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion
- Pillendreher
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,191
- And1: 9,953
- Joined: Jan 25, 2015
-
Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion
Andre Roberstan wrote:Pillendreher wrote:Andre Roberstan wrote:
Assets don't necessarily equal no immediate help.
what assets would that be? Those trades always end up being quality for quantity. That's what I mean by 'the cycle'. We have done this multiple times already and it has come back to bite us almost every single time.
Barring unprecedented growth from one of our other pieces, we're looking at being capped out and possibly in the 2018–19 repeater tax for a 6-7 seed team next year, with 2 RFAs coming up for a payday.
Someone has to go. It could be Russ. It could be Steven. Neither are likely. So that leaves Enes and Dipo, and there are too many offense-first bigs on the market for Enes to get a decent return.
We've done this twice. The first time it was Harden. Presti jumped too early.
The second time it was Jackson. Presti jumped too late.
Hopefully this third time he falls in the middle.
Let's go down the list and look at teams that aren't set at the SG position:
Atlanta (if Bazemore slides over to SF)
Brooklyn
Chicago (if Wade opts out)
Denver (they have a wing surplus though)
Indiana
LA Lakers
Memphis
New Orleans
Philly
Sacramento
What kind of return would even be worth it? A lottery pick? I mean we have to keep our eyes on one simple fact: We can't presume to get away with getting worse while Russ is here. We just can't.
So what are we looking at? I doubt we'd get a high lottery pick this year, unless BC loses it. We could secure a nice package from Denver, but that's just more of the same: Decent, but not (nearly) good enough. Given that your intention is to shed salary, we'd have to look at guys on their rookie deals. Unless we're talking about pure projects: Why would anybody give away a guy close to being a sure deal on a good contract to aquire Oladipo?
I don't see any way for us to not come out worse after trading him.
"I don't know of any player that, when the shot goes up, he doesn't want it to go in," Donovan said
Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion
- ThunderBolt
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 19,358
- And1: 19,201
- Joined: Dec 29, 2016
- Location: Lynnwood, WA
-
Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion
Pillendreher wrote:Andre Roberstan wrote:Pillendreher wrote:
what assets would that be? Those trades always end up being quality for quantity. That's what I mean by 'the cycle'. We have done this multiple times already and it has come back to bite us almost every single time.
Barring unprecedented growth from one of our other pieces, we're looking at being capped out and possibly in the 2018–19 repeater tax for a 6-7 seed team next year, with 2 RFAs coming up for a payday.
Someone has to go. It could be Russ. It could be Steven. Neither are likely. So that leaves Enes and Dipo, and there are too many offense-first bigs on the market for Enes to get a decent return.
We've done this twice. The first time it was Harden. Presti jumped too early.
The second time it was Jackson. Presti jumped too late.
Hopefully this third time he falls in the middle.
Let's go down the list and look at teams that aren't set at the SG position:
Atlanta (if Bazemore slides over to SF)
Brooklyn
Chicago (if Wade opts out)
Denver (they have a wing surplus though)
Indiana
LA Lakers
Memphis
New Orleans
Philly
Sacramento
What kind of return would even be worth it? A lottery pick? I mean we have to keep our eyes on one simple fact: We can't presume to get away with getting worse while Russ is here. We just can't.
So what are we looking at? I doubt we'd get a high lottery pick this year, unless BC loses it. We could secure a nice package from Denver, but that's just more of the same: Decent, but not (nearly) good enough. Given that your intention is to shed salary, we'd have to look at guys on their rookie deals. Unless we're talking about pure projects: Why would anybody give away a guy close to being a sure deal on a good contract to aquire Oladipo?
I don't see any way for us to not come out worse after trading him.
Any chance of trading our draft pick with Oladipo for a higher pick? I mean physically trade our guy after he's been selected. I know we can't trade our pick this year.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
Re: RE:
- Old Man Game
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,281
- And1: 4,317
- Joined: Jul 15, 2012
Re: RE:
Hip_N wrote:Is anybody going? And for those who aren't what channel?
It could happen. Might get into late lottery at most though.
Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion
- Pillendreher
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,191
- And1: 9,953
- Joined: Jan 25, 2015
-
Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion
Knrstz wrote:Pillendreher wrote:Andre Roberstan wrote:
Barring unprecedented growth from one of our other pieces, we're looking at being capped out and possibly in the 2018–19 repeater tax for a 6-7 seed team next year, with 2 RFAs coming up for a payday.
Someone has to go. It could be Russ. It could be Steven. Neither are likely. So that leaves Enes and Dipo, and there are too many offense-first bigs on the market for Enes to get a decent return.
We've done this twice. The first time it was Harden. Presti jumped too early.
The second time it was Jackson. Presti jumped too late.
Hopefully this third time he falls in the middle.
Let's go down the list and look at teams that aren't set at the SG position:
Atlanta (if Bazemore slides over to SF)
Brooklyn
Chicago (if Wade opts out)
Denver (they have a wing surplus though)
Indiana
LA Lakers
Memphis
New Orleans
Philly
Sacramento
What kind of return would even be worth it? A lottery pick? I mean we have to keep our eyes on one simple fact: We can't presume to get away with getting worse while Russ is here. We just can't.
So what are we looking at? I doubt we'd get a high lottery pick this year, unless BC loses it. We could secure a nice package from Denver, but that's just more of the same: Decent, but not (nearly) good enough. Given that your intention is to shed salary, we'd have to look at guys on their rookie deals. Unless we're talking about pure projects: Why would anybody give away a guy close to being a sure deal on a good contract to aquire Oladipo?
I don't see any way for us to not come out worse after trading him.
Any chance of trading our draft pick with Oladipo for a higher pick? I mean physically trade our guy after he's been selected. I know we can't trade our pick this year.
I doubt it. Teams are trying their damnest to hold onto their picks this year. Dipo is not enough of a difference maker to move the needle in that regard imo.
Hell, and even if he were: You have to wait another 2-4 years for the guy you drafted.
"I don't know of any player that, when the shot goes up, he doesn't want it to go in," Donovan said
Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion
- retrobro90
- Forum Mod - Thunder

- Posts: 1,342
- And1: 942
- Joined: Jan 21, 2017
-
Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion
Pillendreher wrote:Knrstz wrote:Pillendreher wrote:
Let's go down the list and look at teams that aren't set at the SG position:
Atlanta (if Bazemore slides over to SF)
Brooklyn
Chicago (if Wade opts out)
Denver (they have a wing surplus though)
Indiana
LA Lakers
Memphis
New Orleans
Philly
Sacramento
What kind of return would even be worth it? A lottery pick? I mean we have to keep our eyes on one simple fact: We can't presume to get away with getting worse while Russ is here. We just can't.
So what are we looking at? I doubt we'd get a high lottery pick this year, unless BC loses it. We could secure a nice package from Denver, but that's just more of the same: Decent, but not (nearly) good enough. Given that your intention is to shed salary, we'd have to look at guys on their rookie deals. Unless we're talking about pure projects: Why would anybody give away a guy close to being a sure deal on a good contract to aquire Oladipo?
I don't see any way for us to not come out worse after trading him.
Any chance of trading our draft pick with Oladipo for a higher pick? I mean physically trade our guy after he's been selected. I know we can't trade our pick this year.
I doubt it. Teams are trying their damnest to hold onto their picks this year. Dipo is not enough of a difference maker to move the needle in that regard imo.
Hell, and even if he were: You have to wait another 2-4 years for the guy you drafted.
There's no chance a smart team does anything for our benefit regarding trading up in the draft. I think it could realistically happen solely based on the fact that a lot of teams in the lottery have incompetent front offices. The difficulty though, as you have said, is about finding a player (in the draft) who would be an immediate impact.
Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion
- ThunderBolt
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 19,358
- And1: 19,201
- Joined: Dec 29, 2016
- Location: Lynnwood, WA
-
Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion
retrobro90 wrote:Pillendreher wrote:Knrstz wrote:
Any chance of trading our draft pick with Oladipo for a higher pick? I mean physically trade our guy after he's been selected. I know we can't trade our pick this year.
I doubt it. Teams are trying their damnest to hold onto their picks this year. Dipo is not enough of a difference maker to move the needle in that regard imo.
Hell, and even if he were: You have to wait another 2-4 years for the guy you drafted.
There's no chance a smart team does anything for our benefit regarding trading up in the draft. I think it could realistically happen solely based on the fact that a lot of teams in the lottery have incompetent front offices. The difficulty though, as you have said, is about finding a player (in the draft) who would be an immediate impact.
When GMs feel the pressure to win now or lose their job, good deals can be made. That's what I'm hoping for. There isn't any way we can predict what Presti will do. I don't think Oladipos production will be that hard to replace.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion
- spearsy23
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,481
- And1: 7,654
- Joined: Jan 27, 2012
-
Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion
Vic is just a guy, he's not a piece that makes or breaks a team. If we split his salary into well fitting pieces I think we could actually be better next year.
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion
- getrichordie
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,425
- And1: 2,313
- Joined: Oct 22, 2015
-
Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion
spearsy23 wrote:Vic is just a guy, he's not a piece that makes or breaks a team. If we split his salary into well fitting pieces I think we could actually be better next year.
What do you think we can net for Dipo + the 19th pick?
[twitter] @thunderdustin
Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion
- spearsy23
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,481
- And1: 7,654
- Joined: Jan 27, 2012
-
Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion
getrichordie wrote:spearsy23 wrote:Vic is just a guy, he's not a piece that makes or breaks a team. If we split his salary into well fitting pieces I think we could actually be better next year.
What do you think we can net for Dipo + the 19th pick?
At that point you're trying to upgrade to a better player, that isn't what I'd go for. I'd keep the pick and try to 'downgrade' into multiple pieces. Maybe something like dipo for Barton + Mudiay or Covington + McConnell (I don't know if either of those clubs do that) then use the savings to try and keep Taj. If all goes well then you end up with some variation of
Russ/Robes/Covington/Taj/Steven
McConnell/Abrines/McThunderBuckets/Domas/Enes
With Kuruks stashed overseas or Ferguson seasoning in the d-league. That team is light on top end talent, but it's deeeeeeeep. Lineups could probably be tinkered with a bit to get better offense/defense balance but I think we'd close with that.
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion
- Osirus89
- Starter
- Posts: 2,148
- And1: 2,017
- Joined: Nov 23, 2016
-
Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion
Sounds like Taj is open to the idea of staying in OKC. Have to see how the season goes, but that is a promising sign.
Caution with the trade scenarios regarding Victor for other pieces. The trade at the deadline was one thing. Those players were mostly irrelevant. However, trading Victor is something that would HAVE to be run by Russ beforehand. I know I wouldn't be the most enthusiastic if a player I had acclimated to over a season was traded for guys that may not move the needle much to save money, or for some rook. Victor isn't harden, but if the return is bad, it would be just as disastrous.
Caution with the trade scenarios regarding Victor for other pieces. The trade at the deadline was one thing. Those players were mostly irrelevant. However, trading Victor is something that would HAVE to be run by Russ beforehand. I know I wouldn't be the most enthusiastic if a player I had acclimated to over a season was traded for guys that may not move the needle much to save money, or for some rook. Victor isn't harden, but if the return is bad, it would be just as disastrous.
Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion
- bondom34
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 66,716
- And1: 50,290
- Joined: Mar 01, 2013
Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion
Money wise, I still say Enes opts out. He's gonna get paid somewhere. If a deal for Vic is there sure.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion
- spearsy23
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,481
- And1: 7,654
- Joined: Jan 27, 2012
-
Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion
bondom34 wrote:Money wise, I still say Enes opts out. He's gonna get paid somewhere. If a deal for Vic is there sure.
I don't think he'll make any more than he already is. Nobody is giving him 25 million per year, especially since the MLE and rookie scale deals will have risen. There's been some speculation that because the high end and the low end are going to make more the middle is going to stagnate a bit.
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion
- bondom34
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 66,716
- And1: 50,290
- Joined: Mar 01, 2013
Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion
spearsy23 wrote:bondom34 wrote:Money wise, I still say Enes opts out. He's gonna get paid somewhere. If a deal for Vic is there sure.
I don't think he'll make any more than he already is. Nobody is giving him 25 million per year, especially since the MLE and rookie scale deals will have risen. There's been some speculation that because the high end and the low end are going to make more the middle is going to stagnate a bit.
He'd at least make what he's getting now, and can lock it up for a long term contract. He wont get 25 but could get 20.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
Return to Oklahoma City Thunder








