Lalouie wrote:i couldn't watch the game of course...
why was schroder not in the game in the end and only got in because westy fouled out??
Schroder sucked tonight. He didn’t deserve any minutes tonight.
Moderators: Dadouv47, retrobro90
Lalouie wrote:i couldn't watch the game of course...
why was schroder not in the game in the end and only got in because westy fouled out??

bondom34 wrote:slick_watts wrote:bondom34 wrote:It never was for one shot. Hes consistently failed at his single job
so you're venting that a guy who has been decent at these things for awhile just hasn't been effective at it this season so far? am i reading this correctly?
I'd rather have Schroder shoot that. I'd rather George, and honestly feel just as good if Westbrook did. Get Brewer back at this point.

slick_watts wrote:bondom34 wrote:slick_watts wrote:
so you're venting that a guy who has been decent at these things for awhile just hasn't been effective at it this season so far? am i reading this correctly?
I'd rather have Schroder shoot that. I'd rather George, and honestly feel just as good if Westbrook did. Get Brewer back at this point.
you are overreacting. you'd rather schroder shoot a wide open three than abrines? are you high? you just admitted you think abrines is a 35% three point shooter, which is better than schroder.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
slick_watts wrote:NaturalThunder wrote:slick_watts wrote:
bad relative to what? i don't think we have any better options on the roster, do we?
You keep moving the goalposts to the point where you don't have to admit you're wrong.
No, we don't have any better 3P options on the roster. Everyone else's point this whole time has been that you cannot play Abrines if he's shooting this poorly from the 3P line (33% over, roughly, the last half of the season) because he's bad at everything else. We've reached a point where we might as well try TLC or Burton (as long as we have him).
we're really advocating tlc or burton over abrines? lol. come on. take a nap.
Coxy wrote:I think with a PG like George Hill, they'd be better than current.

berlioz wrote:slick_watts wrote:NaturalThunder wrote:Leave it to you to find a way to blame this on Russ. The sequence/play I was talking about ended in a well-contested 3 made by Saric, but you'll look for anything to place blame on Russ.
I'm not sure we're talking about the same play anyway. The one I'm talking about, the one that turned our 110-108 lead into a 111-110 deficit, we deflected a pass a the beginning of the possession, then we lost KAT who slipped to the basket and had a great look at the rim that was swatted by Grant who recovered nicely; and then it ended in Saric making a well-contested three to beat the shot clock.
i know the play you are talking about but i do not think that three was well contested. it was bad luck anyway. russ just got beat, like he usually does, by a role player he's supposed to be hiding on. like he got beat by crowder against utah.
I'm pretty sure this didn't happen. Also, the Crowder play (as was pointed out to you) happened because Russ had to go down and get a body on Gobert, which left Crowder open to get the rebound. Not really his fault...
slick_watts wrote:berlioz wrote:slick_watts wrote:
i know the play you are talking about but i do not think that three was well contested. it was bad luck anyway. russ just got beat, like he usually does, by a role player he's supposed to be hiding on. like he got beat by crowder against utah.
I'm pretty sure this didn't happen. Also, the Crowder play (as was pointed out to you) happened because Russ had to go down and get a body on Gobert, which left Crowder open to get the rebound. Not really his fault...Gfycat Video - Click to Play
Coxy wrote:I think with a PG like George Hill, they'd be better than current.

bondom34 wrote:slick_watts wrote:bondom34 wrote:I'd rather have Schroder shoot that. I'd rather George, and honestly feel just as good if Westbrook did. Get Brewer back at this point.
you are overreacting. you'd rather schroder shoot a wide open three than abrines? are you high? you just admitted you think abrines is a 35% three point shooter, which is better than schroder.
I think he could be. He has not been, and was 1-5 before that. Hes literally not an nba player

bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?

NaturalThunder wrote:Not the play I was ever talking about.

slick_watts wrote:bondom34 wrote:slick_watts wrote:
you are overreacting. you'd rather schroder shoot a wide open three than abrines? are you high? you just admitted you think abrines is a 35% three point shooter, which is better than schroder.
I think he could be. He has not been, and was 1-5 before that. Hes literally not an nba player
1-5 before that? hot hand theory? get brewer back at this point? this is bad, dom. you can't believe all this lol.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO

NaturalThunder wrote:slick_watts wrote:berlioz wrote:
I'm pretty sure this didn't happen. Also, the Crowder play (as was pointed out to you) happened because Russ had to go down and get a body on Gobert, which left Crowder open to get the rebound. Not really his fault...Gfycat Video - Click to Play
Not the play I was ever talking about.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
slick_watts wrote:NaturalThunder wrote:Not the play I was ever talking about.
it's the play i was talking about. idc about the play you were talking about, tbh. that was just bad luck mostly.
Coxy wrote:I think with a PG like George Hill, they'd be better than current.

bondom34 wrote:slick_watts wrote:bondom34 wrote:I think he could be. He has not been, and was 1-5 before that. Hes literally not an nba player
1-5 before that? hot hand theory? get brewer back at this point? this is bad, dom. you can't believe all this lol.
I do believe that Abrines is useless. I do believe they can find a player for a minimum contract who could replace what he does. it's not 1-5 tonight, it's not missing 2 of the same shot in the same situation, it's being a bad shooter this year who's been a slightly above average career shooter on relatively low volume who does absolutely nothing else at an nba level.
He's at this point near Patterson level useless and quickly approaching it.

slick_watts wrote:bondom34 wrote:slick_watts wrote:
1-5 before that? hot hand theory? get brewer back at this point? this is bad, dom. you can't believe all this lol.
I do believe that Abrines is useless. I do believe they can find a player for a minimum contract who could replace what he does. it's not 1-5 tonight, it's not missing 2 of the same shot in the same situation, it's being a bad shooter this year who's been a slightly above average career shooter on relatively low volume who does absolutely nothing else at an nba level.
He's at this point near Patterson level useless and quickly approaching it.
i mean that's all fine but i don't see how any of that justifies your commentary on the shot quality we got on the last possession. schroder? really? that makes no sense.
abrines deserves criticism for his play this year just like patterson and just like westbrook. these guys are all stinking up the joint in various ways relative to reasonable expectation. i'm with you that abrines should be replaced if a better player can be acquired (i.e. not corey brewer lol). i'm not with you that all of this somehow magically means we ignore percentages. schroder taking a wide open shot over abrines is patently absurd.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO

bondom34 wrote:And it was Russ preventing KAT from waltzing to the rim. So don't know

slick_watts wrote:bondom34 wrote:And it was Russ preventing KAT from waltzing to the rim. So don't know
adams was fine there. russ is bouncing around like a mad man as usual.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO

bondom34 wrote:I never criticized the shot quality
I criticized the shooter
And lol at dragging Westbrook into it. You're better than that

slick_watts wrote:bondom34 wrote:I never criticized the shot quality
I criticized the shooter
And lol at dragging Westbrook into it. You're better than that
you advocate a worse shooter attempting a shot for no reason other than feelings, i guess. because there's no other reason i can think of. i share many of your concerns about abrines. i think there's an overreaction in particular to this game, and especially that final shot.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO

bondom34 wrote:slick_watts wrote:bondom34 wrote:And it was Russ preventing KAT from waltzing to the rim. So don't know
adams was fine there. russ is bouncing around like a mad man as usual.
You realize when you literally post the video we all have proof right?
Like Adams is half way down the bench helping to Schroder's man, it's right there. He's 10 feet away. You can't just pull something out of nowhere when you post visuals
bondom34 wrote:slick_watts wrote:bondom34 wrote:I think he could be. He has not been, and was 1-5 before that. Hes literally not an nba player
1-5 before that? hot hand theory? get brewer back at this point? this is bad, dom. you can't believe all this lol.
I do believe that Abrines is useless. I do believe they can find a player for a minimum contract who could replace what he does. it's not 1-5 tonight, it's not missing 2 of the same shot in the same situation, it's being a bad shooter this year who's been a slightly above average career shooter on relatively low volume who does absolutely nothing else at an nba level.
He's at this point near Patterson level useless and quickly approaching it.
Return to Oklahoma City Thunder