slick_watts wrote:trading adams for beal you're making a bet that beal can improve efg enough that it makes up for losing adams on the orb and the easy rw / sa pnr. it might make up for it, or more than make up for it.
but it makes things questionable on defense without an adequate replacement. noel is great as a bench big but he cannot be relied on in a starting role playing the way he is.
if that trade was on the table straight up i'd probably do it if only for the speculative value of replacing adams over the summer and really shooting for the moon in 2019-20. but i can't see how that trade would be on the table straight up, washington would get more-- and it'd be an odd mis-season move by presti who imo is waiting until the draft / summer for possible shake ups. trading adams for beal pretty much puts most of our defensive game plan and some of our offensive game plan in the trash. we'd be punting the season away. might not be up presti's alley.
I see what you are saying. I agree with the bet you have detailed and I am willing to bet (and I bet Presti is too) that defense takes a hit but our offensive output goes way up. I think our NetRtg is ultimately higher. We will have some bad games, but he will also have some historical nights in terms of offense.
If we think Mahinmi can replace 75% of Adams impact (offensively and defensively) and Beal can increase Ferguson/Abrines offensive output ceiling by 75%, I think it’s a pretty fair trade off and I think we match up better in the playoffs.
If we can keep Ferguson, we can stagger him with Beal so Beal can run with second unit next to Schroder. And George can stagger w/ Diallo to have some run in second unit as well.
Sent from my iPhone using
RealGM mobile app