2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion

Moderators: retrobro90, Dadouv47

User avatar
ThunderBolt
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,359
And1: 19,203
Joined: Dec 29, 2016
Location: Lynnwood, WA
   

Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion 

Post#1641 » by ThunderBolt » Thu Apr 20, 2017 2:48 pm

Kizz Fastfists wrote:
Knrstz wrote:Do I sound excited about that option? That certainly wasn't my intent. I just don't think Adams, Oladipo and Kanter will get us good established players.


We agree on that. My point was as much as people in general. There are a lot of people who think Russ is just going to stay no matter how bad OKC is. I think he cares too much about winning to stay in OKC past next year when he will get his 35% max from whatever team he signs with.


I don't think it's automatic that he stays. It will be interesting how negotiations play out. Likely Presti says, sign an extension and we'll put together a better team to surround you. Then Russ says, put together that team and then I'll decide if I want to sign an extension.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
User avatar
Osirus89
Starter
Posts: 2,148
And1: 2,017
Joined: Nov 23, 2016
   

Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion 

Post#1642 » by Osirus89 » Thu Apr 20, 2017 4:17 pm

Russell holds all the leverage. He says "I won't sign an extension unless you do xyz", then they do wxyz. They aren't in a position to ask him to commit first. They want to play that game, they will lose every time.

Here is what Russ does if they play hardball. Thunder FO says to commit or they trade him. Ok that's fine, but my agent will just tell every team that I won't sign an extension and will walk when I am a free agent. My trade value is now ruined. You won't get a good package if I flat out say I won't commit to a team, no matter who it is. As long as he doesn't sign an extension, he is a free agent after next season. A trade doesn't change that fact.

That would be a very ugly end to his time in OKC, but that would be how it would end if the front office tries to take a hardline in negotiations. Potential free agents hold the power, that's just the way it is. You can theorycraft trade scenarios all you want, but he can blow that up by saying " Trade me if you want to, but I'm not resigning there. "
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion 

Post#1643 » by bondom34 » Thu Apr 20, 2017 4:19 pm

Honestly I've been more excited for this offseason because it's just so uncertain. It might be a disaster, but I expect stuff to happen. My best honest guess is Kanter is gone, they find a backup PG and a wing on a questionable deal a la Kanter to swap him for.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
Andre Roberstan
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 10,529
And1: 6,868
Joined: Jun 23, 2015
Contact:
   

Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion 

Post#1644 » by Andre Roberstan » Thu Apr 20, 2017 4:24 pm

bondom34 wrote:Honestly I've been more excited for this offseason because it's just so uncertain. It might be a disaster, but I expect stuff to happen. My best honest guess is Kanter is gone, they find a backup PG and a wing on a questionable deal a la Kanter to swap him for.


Whatever happens happens at this point. This team is going to make me a fatalist.
Image
User avatar
Pillendreher
RealGM
Posts: 14,191
And1: 9,953
Joined: Jan 25, 2015
 

Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion 

Post#1645 » by Pillendreher » Thu Apr 20, 2017 5:37 pm

This team makes me play 2K17 just to make moves. I turned Kanter, Lauvergne, Christon and another player into WCS, Matthews and Justin Anderson. Oladipo still couldn't hit shots tho :D
"I don't know of any player that, when the shot goes up, he doesn't want it to go in," Donovan said
Dn4sty
Analyst
Posts: 3,477
And1: 1,929
Joined: Apr 11, 2017

Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion 

Post#1646 » by Dn4sty » Thu Apr 20, 2017 6:24 pm

Thunder get Carroll, Joseph, Joe Harris, and Celtics 1st
Nets get Kanter, Powell multiple 2nds (from both Raptors and OKC)
Raptors get OKC 1st and Huestis

OKC does this for these reasons. Backup PG, a decent wing , and another shooter is Harris. I'd then just draft best player available at the Celtics pick.

The Nets get picks, Powell who is really under rated and on a cheap deal. They also get a chance to run Kanter with second unit or even as starting center if they trade Lopez. Also Kanter likely opts out after next year anyway, so this is primarily done to acquire assets (picks and powell)

The Raptors clear over 20 million in salary to help retain Lowry, Ibaka, Tucker and a 1st round pick
User avatar
Pillendreher
RealGM
Posts: 14,191
And1: 9,953
Joined: Jan 25, 2015
 

Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion 

Post#1647 » by Pillendreher » Thu Apr 20, 2017 7:04 pm

Dn4sty wrote:Thunder get Carroll, Joseph, Joe Harris, and Celtics 1st
Nets get Kanter, Powell multiple 2nds (from both Raptors and OKC)
Raptors get OKC 1st and Huestis

OKC does this for these reasons. Backup PG, a decent wing , and another shooter is Harris. I'd then just draft best player available at the Celtics pick.

The Nets get picks, Powell who is really under rated and on a cheap deal. They also get a chance to run Kanter with second unit or even as starting center if they trade Lopez. Also Kanter likely opts out after next year anyway, so this is primarily done to acquire assets (picks and powell)

The Raptors clear over 20 million in salary to help retain Lowry, Ibaka, Tucker and a 1st round pick


I want Powell, not Carroll.
"I don't know of any player that, when the shot goes up, he doesn't want it to go in," Donovan said
Andre Roberstan
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 10,529
And1: 6,868
Joined: Jun 23, 2015
Contact:
   

Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion 

Post#1648 » by Andre Roberstan » Thu Apr 20, 2017 7:04 pm

Dn4sty wrote:Thunder get Carroll, Joseph, Joe Harris, and Celtics 1st
Nets get Kanter, Powell multiple 2nds (from both Raptors and OKC)
Raptors get OKC 1st and Huestis

OKC does this for these reasons. Backup PG, a decent wing , and another shooter is Harris. I'd then just draft best player available at the Celtics pick.

The Nets get picks, Powell who is really under rated and on a cheap deal. They also get a chance to run Kanter with second unit or even as starting center if they trade Lopez. Also Kanter likely opts out after next year anyway, so this is primarily done to acquire assets (picks and powell)

The Raptors clear over 20 million in salary to help retain Lowry, Ibaka, Tucker and a 1st round pick


Actually works under CBA from OKC side—didn't think it would.

I don't see the Raps giving up Powell to clear cap space, though. Fine with it from OKC's end, though Carroll's contract doesn't exactly make me jump for joy.

Think the Raps would ask for Lin from the Nets and probably one of OKC's young guys too.
Image
Andre Roberstan
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 10,529
And1: 6,868
Joined: Jun 23, 2015
Contact:
   

Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion 

Post#1649 » by Andre Roberstan » Thu Apr 20, 2017 7:27 pm

FYI, just checked and the Kings have a stupid amount of cap space next year based on most likely outcomes. And they like big men and shooting guards.
Image
User avatar
Pillendreher
RealGM
Posts: 14,191
And1: 9,953
Joined: Jan 25, 2015
 

Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion 

Post#1650 » by Pillendreher » Thu Apr 20, 2017 7:30 pm

Andre Roberstan wrote:FYI, just checked and the Kings have a stupid amount of cap space next year based on most likely outcomes. And they like big men and shooting guards.


But no talent we'd want. So what's the point?
"I don't know of any player that, when the shot goes up, he doesn't want it to go in," Donovan said
User avatar
ThunderBolt
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,359
And1: 19,203
Joined: Dec 29, 2016
Location: Lynnwood, WA
   

Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion 

Post#1651 » by ThunderBolt » Thu Apr 20, 2017 7:30 pm

Andre Roberstan wrote:FYI, just checked and the Kings have a stupid amount of cap space next year based on most likely outcomes. And they like big men and shooting guards.

Maybe we can get an older, rehabbing Rudy Gay.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
Andre Roberstan
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 10,529
And1: 6,868
Joined: Jun 23, 2015
Contact:
   

Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion 

Post#1652 » by Andre Roberstan » Thu Apr 20, 2017 7:54 pm

Pillendreher wrote:
Andre Roberstan wrote:FYI, just checked and the Kings have a stupid amount of cap space next year based on most likely outcomes. And they like big men and shooting guards.


But no talent we'd want. So what's the point?

Prime Kanter destination if they were to want him, good 3rd trade partner in any trade that opens up space. Also you're underestimating their young guys a bit—WCS in particular is a guy I'd want.
Image
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion 

Post#1653 » by bondom34 » Thu Apr 20, 2017 7:55 pm

Andre Roberstan wrote:
Pillendreher wrote:
Andre Roberstan wrote:FYI, just checked and the Kings have a stupid amount of cap space next year based on most likely outcomes. And they like big men and shooting guards.


But no talent we'd want. So what's the point?

Prime Kanter destination if they were to want him, good 3rd trade partner in any trade that opens up space. Also you're underestimating their young guys a bit—WCS in particular is a guy I'd want.

I'd still like to see if they could get Miami to bite on McBob and TJ for cap space and send out Kanter.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
Andre Roberstan
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 10,529
And1: 6,868
Joined: Jun 23, 2015
Contact:
   

Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion 

Post#1654 » by Andre Roberstan » Thu Apr 20, 2017 7:55 pm

Knrstz wrote:
Andre Roberstan wrote:FYI, just checked and the Kings have a stupid amount of cap space next year based on most likely outcomes. And they like big men and shooting guards.

Maybe we can get an older, rehabbing Rudy Gay.


James Ham seems to think he could opt out and likely try to play elsewhere.
Image
User avatar
Pillendreher
RealGM
Posts: 14,191
And1: 9,953
Joined: Jan 25, 2015
 

Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion 

Post#1655 » by Pillendreher » Thu Apr 20, 2017 8:00 pm

Andre Roberstan wrote:
Pillendreher wrote:
Andre Roberstan wrote:FYI, just checked and the Kings have a stupid amount of cap space next year based on most likely outcomes. And they like big men and shooting guards.


But no talent we'd want. So what's the point?

Prime Kanter destination if they were to want him, good 3rd trade partner in any trade that opens up space. Also you're underestimating their young guys a bit—WCS in particular is a guy I'd want.


Wasn't there some thread about WCS where people were saying he was kinda meh since Cousins got traded?
"I don't know of any player that, when the shot goes up, he doesn't want it to go in," Donovan said
Andre Roberstan
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 10,529
And1: 6,868
Joined: Jun 23, 2015
Contact:
   

Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion 

Post#1656 » by Andre Roberstan » Thu Apr 20, 2017 8:13 pm

Pillendreher wrote:
Andre Roberstan wrote:
Pillendreher wrote:
But no talent we'd want. So what's the point?

Prime Kanter destination if they were to want him, good 3rd trade partner in any trade that opens up space. Also you're underestimating their young guys a bit—WCS in particular is a guy I'd want.


Wasn't there some thread about WCS where people were saying he was kinda meh since Cousins got traded?


Probably. But I like the guy.

He's not much on offense, but he's a decent roller and very, very fast and agile for a center. Decent defender on and off ball with potential for more. They used him as their primary KD defender last year.
Image
User avatar
Pillendreher
RealGM
Posts: 14,191
And1: 9,953
Joined: Jan 25, 2015
 

Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion 

Post#1657 » by Pillendreher » Thu Apr 20, 2017 8:17 pm

Andre Roberstan wrote:
Pillendreher wrote:
Andre Roberstan wrote:Prime Kanter destination if they were to want him, good 3rd trade partner in any trade that opens up space. Also you're underestimating their young guys a bit—WCS in particular is a guy I'd want.


Wasn't there some thread about WCS where people were saying he was kinda meh since Cousins got traded?


Probably. But I like the guy.

He's not much on offense, but he's a decent roller and very, very fast and agile for a center. Decent defender on and off ball with potential for more. They used him as their primary KD defender last year.


What would we have to give up for him tho? And what would his role be? We're currently trying to feature two centers and it hurts us.
"I don't know of any player that, when the shot goes up, he doesn't want it to go in," Donovan said
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion 

Post#1658 » by bondom34 » Thu Apr 20, 2017 8:18 pm

What hurts is one center can't play.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
Andre Roberstan
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 10,529
And1: 6,868
Joined: Jun 23, 2015
Contact:
   

Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion 

Post#1659 » by Andre Roberstan » Thu Apr 20, 2017 8:21 pm

Pillendreher wrote:
Andre Roberstan wrote:
Pillendreher wrote:
Wasn't there some thread about WCS where people were saying he was kinda meh since Cousins got traded?


Probably. But I like the guy.

He's not much on offense, but he's a decent roller and very, very fast and agile for a center. Decent defender on and off ball with potential for more. They used him as their primary KD defender last year.


What would we have to give up for him tho? And what would his role be? We're currently trying to feature two centers and it hurts us.


Heck if I know. I'd target him in a Kanter trade, but it's unlikely. Probably bench center. Might make Adams expendable in a year or two if he developed well, and if not you can move him along if Dakari comes along well. But if I were trying to make a team that can run with small-ball teams, he's the kind of guy I'd go for.

WCS isn't a guy you "feature".
Image
User avatar
ThunderBolt
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,359
And1: 19,203
Joined: Dec 29, 2016
Location: Lynnwood, WA
   

Re: 2017 OKC Thunder Trade Discussion 

Post#1660 » by ThunderBolt » Thu Apr 20, 2017 9:14 pm

I thought wcs put up some really solid numbers after counsins left. Better numbers than Adams puts up currently.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?

Return to Oklahoma City Thunder