OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening

Moderators: Dadouv47, retrobro90

Andre Roberstan
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 10,540
And1: 6,878
Joined: Jun 23, 2015
Contact:
   

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#1961 » by Andre Roberstan » Sun Jul 2, 2017 5:53 pm

Pillendreher wrote:
itzmrgigglez wrote:
Pillendreher wrote:
Read on Twitter


And we're back to Sam Presti being trash.


Relax, it's a patient game we play


I of course know that it's just day two of the new season. But I hate this line of thinking so much:'Hey, let's act like our trash isn't trash'. No! :banghead:


Royce is talking like he always does. If you think that's Presti's thinking I have some oceanfront property on I-35 I want to sell you.
Image
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#1962 » by bondom34 » Sun Jul 2, 2017 5:53 pm

Read on Twitter


That's good at least.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
User avatar
Pillendreher
RealGM
Posts: 14,191
And1: 9,953
Joined: Jan 25, 2015
 

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#1963 » by Pillendreher » Sun Jul 2, 2017 5:56 pm

Andre Roberstan wrote:
Pillendreher wrote:
itzmrgigglez wrote:
Relax, it's a patient game we play


I of course know that it's just day two of the new season. But I hate this line of thinking so much:'Hey, let's act like our trash isn't trash'. No! :banghead:


Royce is talking like he always does. If you think that's Presti's thinking I have some oceanfront property on I-35 I want to sell you.


Meh. We held onto Sabonis for too long last season too. Wouldn't be the first time we enter a season with an unsolved positional problem.

I could totally see this. Royce even wrote about it yesterday, saying the Thunder were excited about the George-Grant pairing. :crazy: :noway:
"I don't know of any player that, when the shot goes up, he doesn't want it to go in," Donovan said
slick_watts
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,562
And1: 6,820
Joined: Jan 03, 2005
Location: Miami, FL

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#1964 » by slick_watts » Sun Jul 2, 2017 5:57 pm

royce is less than 24 hours removed from telling us presti 'wasn't done yet', less than 12 hours removed from 'rudy gay being close', less than 2 hours removed from proposing an impossible sign and trade taj gibson scenario, etc.

he's just reacting to the same news we are and pushing out content. it's his job.
slick_watts
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,562
And1: 6,820
Joined: Jan 03, 2005
Location: Miami, FL

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#1965 » by slick_watts » Sun Jul 2, 2017 5:58 pm

Pillendreher wrote:I could totally see this. Royce even wrote about it yesterday, saying the Thunder were excited about the George-Grant pairing. :crazy: :noway:


was he 97% sure of that?
slick_watts
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,562
And1: 6,820
Joined: Jan 03, 2005
Location: Miami, FL

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#1966 » by slick_watts » Sun Jul 2, 2017 6:17 pm

this is how the thunder local media reacts to everything. when there are reports of thunder interest in a player- talk about all the possible ways it can happen, talk about how the thunder are 'interested' and where that player would fit, etc. etc. when the player leaves and the reactionary optimism peters out start talking about how it was all so unrealistic anyway, include all the reasons it'd be difficult, etc.

they really don't know what they are talking about. fred katz just tweeted something about whether or not the thunder could 'convince' rudy gay to take the mle or less. this is hours after woj expressed the difficulty the thunder had arranging a sign and trade with the kings. so which one is it?

i put zero stock into katz or royce or any of them reporting on meetings or who or what the thunder are interested in / their motivations.
User avatar
ThunderBolt
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,368
And1: 19,237
Joined: Dec 29, 2016
Location: Lynnwood, WA
   

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#1967 » by ThunderBolt » Sun Jul 2, 2017 6:34 pm

Pillendreher wrote:
itzmrgigglez wrote:
Pillendreher wrote:
Read on Twitter


And we're back to Sam Presti being trash.


Relax, it's a patient game we play


I of course know that it's just day two of the new season. But I hate this line of thinking so much:'Hey, let's act like our trash isn't trash'. No! :banghead:


I don't know how much Royce is really in the know. Or possibly how much Royce withholds. I wouldn't get too worked up over what he says.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
User avatar
Old Man Game
Head Coach
Posts: 6,281
And1: 4,317
Joined: Jul 15, 2012

Re: RE: Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#1968 » by Old Man Game » Sun Jul 2, 2017 6:36 pm

slick_watts wrote:this is how the thunder local media reacts to everything. when there are reports of thunder interest in a player- talk about all the possible ways it can happen, talk about how the thunder are 'interested' and where that player would fit, etc. etc. when the player leaves and the reactionary optimism peters out start talking about how it was all so unrealistic anyway, include all the reasons it'd be difficult, etc.

they really don't know what they are talking about. fred katz just tweeted something about whether or not the thunder could 'convince' rudy gay to take the mle or less. this is hours after woj expressed the difficulty the thunder had arranging a sign and trade with the kings. so which one is it?

i put zero stock into katz or royce or any of them reporting on meetings or who or what the thunder are interested in / their motivations.

Fred is a lot more level headed about it than Royce.
Dadouv47
Forum Mod - Thunder
Forum Mod - Thunder
Posts: 13,448
And1: 7,584
Joined: Mar 22, 2015
   

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#1969 » by Dadouv47 » Sun Jul 2, 2017 6:44 pm

I like Taj a lot and will miss him, but clearly by winning 14 millions / year, we couldn't afford it. Even if we had the cap space, I wouldn't want to give him that much money.

Going to be very difficult to find a solution at the 4 now :(
User avatar
ThunderBolt
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,368
And1: 19,237
Joined: Dec 29, 2016
Location: Lynnwood, WA
   

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#1970 » by ThunderBolt » Sun Jul 2, 2017 6:45 pm

What would it take to get favors from Utah? They offer that guy in every trade on the T&T board.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
User avatar
Old Man Game
Head Coach
Posts: 6,281
And1: 4,317
Joined: Jul 15, 2012

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#1971 » by Old Man Game » Sun Jul 2, 2017 6:49 pm

The thought of starting Grant at PF is pretty frightening. Relying on Doug even more so.
Kizz Fastfists
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,451
And1: 1,877
Joined: Jun 05, 2014
   

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#1972 » by Kizz Fastfists » Sun Jul 2, 2017 6:54 pm

Knrstz wrote:What would it take to get favors from Utah? They offer that guy in every trade on the T&T board.


Favors makes $12M. We know they wouldn't be interested in Adams or Kanter. I don't think Singler, Abrines and McDermott gets it done. I don't think Abrines, McDermott, Grant and Huestis works. So something involving Russ or George, which also doesn't work.
"The secret to success is to offend the greatest number of people." -George Bernard Shaw
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#1973 » by bondom34 » Sun Jul 2, 2017 6:59 pm

Call me gullible but I don't buy they're not up to something. I don't see them rolling into the year with the PF rotation as some mixup of Grant/McDermott/Gay.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
User avatar
retrobro90
Forum Mod - Thunder
Forum Mod - Thunder
Posts: 1,342
And1: 942
Joined: Jan 21, 2017
 

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#1974 » by retrobro90 » Sun Jul 2, 2017 7:49 pm

I think we add a 4 but I wouldn't be surprised if it's someone deep on the margins. Hard to see us clearing the cap and getting someone like Jamychal Green. Maybe we get an overseas dude or someone on the buyout market like Tolliver etc. Would much prefer that anyway and with Dre and PG on the wings we can definitely get away with a smaller stretch 4 like mcbuckets
jambalaya
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,674
And1: 289
Joined: Feb 01, 2005

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#1975 » by jambalaya » Sun Jul 2, 2017 7:52 pm

PG for year hasn't "saved" Westbrook yet but it does raise the question: what if Presti had done something big 2-3 years ago? Was Durant saveable? Maybe, maybe not. But would probably would have increased chances.
Thunder Up
Senior
Posts: 616
And1: 197
Joined: Jun 26, 2017
 

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#1976 » by Thunder Up » Sun Jul 2, 2017 7:55 pm

jambalaya wrote:PG for year hasn't "saved" Westbrook yet but it does raise the question: what if Presti had done something big 2-3 years ago? Was Durant saveable? Maybe, maybe not. But would probably would have increased chances.


Durant not choking in the WCF (and the whole playoffs for that matter on wide open 3p attempts) would have saved Durant.
User avatar
NaturalThunder
General Manager
Posts: 8,491
And1: 3,907
Joined: Jun 13, 2012
     

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#1977 » by NaturalThunder » Sun Jul 2, 2017 7:56 pm

If we enter the season with the plan of starting Grant at PF and Semaj Christon as our backup PG, then the Paul George trade will be all for naught. We're still worse than the Warriors, Spurs, Rockets, and Jazz (if they retain Hayward) if we don't address our gaping hole at PF and backup PG.
Said in a thread about which point guards would make OKC better if they replaced Westbrook:
Coxy wrote:I think with a PG like George Hill, they'd be better than current.
User avatar
ThunderBolt
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,368
And1: 19,237
Joined: Dec 29, 2016
Location: Lynnwood, WA
   

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#1978 » by ThunderBolt » Sun Jul 2, 2017 8:01 pm

Is everyone really ok with Abrines being our starting shooting guard?
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
User avatar
Old Man Game
Head Coach
Posts: 6,281
And1: 4,317
Joined: Jul 15, 2012

Re: RE: Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#1979 » by Old Man Game » Sun Jul 2, 2017 8:06 pm

Knrstz wrote:Is everyone really ok with Abrines being our starting shooting guard?

I actually really like him. But I think Robes starts.
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#1980 » by bondom34 » Sun Jul 2, 2017 8:06 pm

Yeah I think it's Russ/Robes/PG/X/Adams.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO

Return to Oklahoma City Thunder