QPR wrote:Three of the four season match-ups were decided by three points or less, and Houston shot a ridiculous percentage from three in the last one. I don't see any reason why OKC can't win this series.
I think a lot of that has to do with that Houston simply overwhelms teams and the Thunder have struggled all season long. We have been very up and down this season: We've had 5 winnings streaks of 4 straight wins or more, but we've also had 5 losing streaks of 3 straight losses or more. Look at our MOV for each game on the season:

22 out of our 47 wins have been by double digits, but we also have 22 double digit losses. Our variance and lack of consistency has been killing us this season.
Some of Houston's 'struggles' have gone under the radar though. They've had a very strong first two months (7.5 NetRtG, which would be good for 60 wins on the season), but haven't played as well ever since January (3.9 NetRtG, which would be good for 51 wins).
What stands out to me with Houston is that they rely heavily on quantity, not quality. Since 1/1, they've shot 34 % from 3:
Gordon 32.7 %
Ariza 31.5 %
Williams 31.8 %
Anderson 39.6 %
Beverley 37.4 %
Harden 33.6 %
Safe for the injured Decker and the now gone Brewer, this is Houston's 3PT shooting. That's 34.2 % (34.0 % overall) and puts them 24th over the span of close to 50 games. In comparison: We're 26th over that same timeframe at 32.6 %. They've still made the most 3s tho because they take the most per game by far.
I can't help but feel like this is something that other teams can take advantage off. The game slows down in the Playoffs and possessions become more valuable. You can't just keep playing the % like that. On the season, they're 18-21 in games in which they've shot 35 % from or worse. 25 out of those 39 games happened after 1/1 and they're 10-15 in those.
Now of course their ORtG has been extremely good despite that, but you have to ask if that's maybe more of a 'mirage' than some might think. They have very streaky guys and when they get hot as a team, it's tough to beat them (38-7 in games in which they've made 35 % or more of their 3s). Yet I would argue that's not a viable strategy for postseason success. I think Donovan's not a good coach, but you can't deny the fact that we adjusted pretty well to both the Spurs and the Warriors last postseason, so it seems like we are indeed capable of scheming for opponents.
Our rotations have to be on point and we have to take advantage of their below average to bad defense (contrary to what the Dunc'd On guys think, Houston isn't a good defensive team).
We can win this.
"I don't know of any player that, when the shot goes up, he doesn't want it to go in," Donovan said