https://newsok.com/article/5612404/thunder-buddies-podcast-talking-thunder-clippers-with-dan-woike-of-the-los-angeles-timesErik Horne on Donovan (starts at 21:23):
Question: How does Donovan still have a job?
Horne: Good question. You know, I had a discussion with somebody last night about this. I think that it is getting - I'm not saying that Billy Donovan should be fired - but it is getting to the point to where you have to wonder how much the players are taking what Billy is telling them and converting it on the court. It doesn't seem like they're doing much of that at all. At least not in the moments where they really need to be doing it the most. I think last night was one of the few moments I can remember in 3 years I've been around Billy Donovan that he pretty much threw the players under the bus. The Orlando game last year when the Thunder started 8-12 and they got blown out by Orlando. That was a game where he pretty much put in on the players. And this game he put it on the players too I think. He said they didn't execute in any facet on offense or defense, they didn't execute well enough, they had to be better. They got stagnant and he usually doesnt't do that. And I think you have to wonder if there's a disconnect. I don't know if there is any coach out there that could get through to Russell Westbrook or Paul George and get them to play and take efficient shots, or get them to play better shots, because as good as Paul George is, he took some bad shots last night. As good as he was in the Warriors game where he got hot in the 3rd quarter and they came back, he was taking some ridiculously contested shots, like in Kevin Durant's face, and they were just going in. That's well and good, you can ride that to a certain extent, but I don't think you develop as a team when you're continually relying on superlative talents to just make crazy shots over guys night in, night out. That's the stuff you marvel at, and you marvel at what Russell Westbrook and Paul George can you, but it doesn't really get you anywhere. You're still going out in the first round against Utah because you're not seeking the most efficient shot possible. So I think that that's a problem. I think that it's a real problem with Billy Donovan. I don't think that these players - at times - consistently translate what he wants to do for 48 minutes. And I feel like we've been talking about that for four years now. And if you're talking about that for 3.5, 4 years, then you gotta wonder if a chance is necessary. I think I've discussed this - maybe not on the podcast, but somewhere - and again, two games, they need to give it some time. You're not gonna fire a game after two games. That's not what the Thunder does, even if you the listener or I, the writer, thinks that something should be changed, you gotta understand that's not how the Thunder operates. It's not a PJ Carlisimo situation. Billy Donovan's a guy they believe in. Now wether or not that believe is legitimate, I mean I guess that's up to us to decide, but, you know, if you've been sitting around for three years and seeing the same things happening, guys running their heads into the wall, not really getting the message of, you know, taking efficient shots, or, you know, seeking the best shot, or giving, you know, maximum thought and effort into each end of the floor, you gotta wonder if the message's getting through. I'm not sure if the message can get through to a Russell Westbrook or a Paul George, nine, ten years into their careers, but it might be time to find out for somebody else. That was not me calling for Billy Donovan to get fired, that was just me saying I do have serious doubt as to wether or not Billy Donovan can get this particular team over the hump, but frankly I have doubts that any coach can get a Russell Westbrook-Paul combination in this NBA [...]
Interesting that this gets brought up like this two games into the season. I fear Horne might be falling for Donovan's PR speak though. He's assuming that Donovan is coaching, but is not getting through to the players. I suspect that Donovan is indeed coaching, but not what he's saying to the media. When the whole offensive system is the equivalent of Germany's soccer legend, Franz Beckenbauer, telling the German national team as the HC back in 1990 to just "go out and play soccer", this is what you're getting. Paul George basically admitted that there's no real offensive gameplan in place (I'm talking about the choas quote from one or two weeks ago). You can't just rely on guys "freestyling" it out there. This is the NBA, not Rucker Park.
He may be talking about it, but I highly doubt he's actually coaching it. At least not the degree that it actually made a difference on the court. Think about where we have been as a franchise for the last four 3 years: It's a gif worthy moment for the Thunder to make two extra passes to find the open shot. That's how rudimentary this team's offense has been since Donovan replaced Brooks. They have gone through at least 30 to 40 different players in Donovan's three seasons and it's always been the same issues, year in, year out. Some of it is Westbrook's and his limitations, but at the end of the day, it's still part of the head coaches job description to actually coach and create some sort of plan for the team to follow. It is possible to be a "player's coach" without actually surrendering gameplanning to the players. Westbrook probably requires more "freedom" to create the kind of chaos he lives in, but that doesn't force the coaching staff to just sit back and be a bystander.
It is unfortunate though that we might be wasting yet another season with Donovan. Ideally, there should have been a cut at least after last season and the team's complete inability to generate offense without forcing steals and its inability to defend at a somewhat reasonable level with 25 minutes of Andre Roberson per game.
"I don't know of any player that, when the shot goes up, he doesn't want it to go in," Donovan said