WCQF: Oklahoma City Thunder vs Houston Rockets | P1

Moderators: retrobro90, Dadouv47

Winner

Thunder in 4
1
6%
Thunder in 5
1
6%
Thunder in 6
5
28%
Thunder in 7
2
11%
Rockets in 4
1
6%
Rockets in 5
3
17%
Rockets in 6
4
22%
Rockets in 7
1
6%
 
Total votes: 18

User avatar
Old Man Game
Head Coach
Posts: 6,281
And1: 4,317
Joined: Jul 15, 2012

Re: WCQF: Oklahoma City Thunder vs Houston Rockets | P1 

Post#201 » by Old Man Game » Mon Aug 24, 2020 3:03 am

getrichordie wrote:Since we've mentioned Andrew Schlecht already, I wanted to point out that he made a good observation on the most recent podcast. The Thunder had no tape on this iteration of the Rockets headed into game 1. None. So there was a bit of an advantage to HOU in that regard as well on top of the experience advantage they already have...
That's an extremely incorrect point. This iteration was together before the hiatus after the trade deadline and played several games. just because the thunder themselves hadn't played against them doesn't mean they couldn't effectively scout them.

Sent from my Pixel using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
getrichordie
General Manager
Posts: 9,425
And1: 2,313
Joined: Oct 22, 2015
 

Re: WCQF: Oklahoma City Thunder vs Houston Rockets | P1 

Post#202 » by getrichordie » Mon Aug 24, 2020 3:46 am

Old Man Game wrote:
getrichordie wrote:Since we've mentioned Andrew Schlecht already, I wanted to point out that he made a good observation on the most recent podcast. The Thunder had no tape on this iteration of the Rockets headed into game 1. None. So there was a bit of an advantage to HOU in that regard as well on top of the experience advantage they already have...
That's an extremely incorrect point. This iteration was together before the hiatus after the trade deadline and played several games. just because the thunder themselves hadn't played against them doesn't mean they couldn't effectively scout them.

Sent from my Pixel using RealGM mobile app


Without Westbrook?
[twitter] @thunderdustin
User avatar
ThunderBolt
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,359
And1: 19,203
Joined: Dec 29, 2016
Location: Lynnwood, WA
   

Re: WCQF: Oklahoma City Thunder vs Houston Rockets | P1 

Post#203 » by ThunderBolt » Mon Aug 24, 2020 12:57 pm

There have been load management games for Russ. Also, when he's on the bench and harden is in the game, the lineups would have been similar.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
User avatar
Galloisdaman
Analyst
Posts: 3,674
And1: 2,171
Joined: Mar 17, 2011

Re: WCQF: Oklahoma City Thunder vs Houston Rockets | P1 

Post#204 » by Galloisdaman » Mon Aug 24, 2020 1:21 pm

My NY Rangers (NHL) were swept. I feel better after the OKC guys worked hard to come back for that win. Can they make it a series today?

Slightly off topic but some people are really going hard after PG on the general board. The guy has had 3 bad games but they are going after him like he is one of the worst players ever.
My eyes glaze over when reading alternative stat (not advanced stat) narratives that go many paragraphs long. If you can not make your point in 2 paragraphs it may not be a great point. :D
User avatar
ThunderBolt
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,359
And1: 19,203
Joined: Dec 29, 2016
Location: Lynnwood, WA
   

Re: WCQF: Oklahoma City Thunder vs Houston Rockets | P1 

Post#205 » by ThunderBolt » Mon Aug 24, 2020 1:59 pm

Galloisdaman wrote:My NY Rangers (NHL) were swept. I feel better after the OKC guys worked hard to come back for that win. Can they make it a series today?

Slightly off topic but some people are really going hard after PG on the general board. The guy has had 3 bad games but they are going after him like he is one of the worst players ever.

Every game has threads with the winnings team's star being praised and the losing team's start being ridiculed. George, Jokic are getting it now. Gobert got it after game one. Lillard has gotten both sides so far. The general board is really full of idiots.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
User avatar
Galloisdaman
Analyst
Posts: 3,674
And1: 2,171
Joined: Mar 17, 2011

Re: WCQF: Oklahoma City Thunder vs Houston Rockets | P1 

Post#206 » by Galloisdaman » Mon Aug 24, 2020 2:04 pm

ThunderBolt wrote:
Galloisdaman wrote:My NY Rangers (NHL) were swept. I feel better after the OKC guys worked hard to come back for that win. Can they make it a series today?

Slightly off topic but some people are really going hard after PG on the general board. The guy has had 3 bad games but they are going after him like he is one of the worst players ever.

Every game has threads with the winnings team's star being praised and the losing team's start being ridiculed. George, Jokic are getting it now. Gobert got it after game one. Lillard has gotten both sides so far. The general board is really full of idiots.


That is true. Sometimes with the stardom and big salary much is expected. Then you add on the huge trade and people are going in hard after PG. He is definitely a really good player but also has definitely been in a huge 3 game slump. Its tough when a shooting slump happens at the worst time.
My eyes glaze over when reading alternative stat (not advanced stat) narratives that go many paragraphs long. If you can not make your point in 2 paragraphs it may not be a great point. :D
slick_watts
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,544
And1: 6,802
Joined: Jan 03, 2005
Location: Miami, FL

Re: WCQF: Oklahoma City Thunder vs Houston Rockets | P1 

Post#207 » by slick_watts » Mon Aug 24, 2020 2:30 pm

paul george deserves the flak after dubbing himself 'playoff p'. perhaps it's not fair in the sense that george is clearly not the same as he was his last year for us. due to his shoulder problems, maybe. but when you bestow a nickname like that on yourself, you're inviting criticism if you do not deliver.

as for this series, it's fun to see shai perform so well. lu dort, objectively inferior to andre roberson, nevertheless has attained golden child status with thunder media-- something roberson was never afforded. steven adams might be useless with westbrook not playing. chris paul might spend the offseason in cryotherapy after playing 40 minutes in playoff games. dennis schroder has been terrible. danilo gallinari has been great. terrance ferguson should play a bit more. diallo, nader, and noel should not see the floor ever again.
slick_watts
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,544
And1: 6,802
Joined: Jan 03, 2005
Location: Miami, FL

Re: WCQF: Oklahoma City Thunder vs Houston Rockets | P1 

Post#208 » by slick_watts » Mon Aug 24, 2020 2:34 pm

the only reason the thunder have been good this season is the three guard lineup, with either adams or noel in it. billy's reluctance to move away from what got the thunder here is understandable. the blog boys who think this move is 'obvious' are not potential lame duck coaches who might need to find another job next season. playing small exclusively is a big risk to take when it excludes the lineup that basically owned the nba this season.
User avatar
ThunderBolt
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,359
And1: 19,203
Joined: Dec 29, 2016
Location: Lynnwood, WA
   

Re: WCQF: Oklahoma City Thunder vs Houston Rockets | P1 

Post#209 » by ThunderBolt » Mon Aug 24, 2020 4:22 pm

slick_watts wrote:paul george deserves the flak after dubbing himself 'playoff p'. perhaps it's not fair in the sense that george is clearly not the same as he was his last year for us. due to his shoulder problems, maybe. but when you bestow a nickname like that on yourself, you're inviting criticism if you do not deliver.

as for this series, it's fun to see shai perform so well. lu dort, objectively inferior to andre roberson, nevertheless has attained golden child status with thunder media-- something roberson was never afforded. steven adams might be useless with westbrook not playing. chris paul might spend the offseason in cryotherapy after playing 40 minutes in playoff games. dennis schroder has been terrible. danilo gallinari has been great. terrance ferguson should play a bit more. diallo, nader, and noel should not see the floor ever again.

I feel bad for him but at the same time, he brings it on himself because he talks too much. Even recently he mentioned that he was better than when he first returned.

“The whole season, all the way up until maybe a month or two ago, I had to always do shoulder rehab stuff, warming the shoulder up,” George said Friday on a conference call with reporters. “Just so much went into stuff I had to do before I actually took a foot on the floor. Now I feel great again.”
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
User avatar
Old Man Game
Head Coach
Posts: 6,281
And1: 4,317
Joined: Jul 15, 2012

Re: WCQF: Oklahoma City Thunder vs Houston Rockets | P1 

Post#210 » by Old Man Game » Mon Aug 24, 2020 5:31 pm

slick_watts wrote:the only reason the thunder have been good this season is the three guard lineup, with either adams or noel in it. billy's reluctance to move away from what got the thunder here is understandable. the blog boys who think this move is 'obvious' are not potential lame duck coaches who might need to find another job next season. playing small exclusively is a big risk to take when it excludes the lineup that basically owned the nba this season.


You're kidding? This isn't Jacque Vaughn or some other interim coach with a mediocre to poor record to run on. This is a guy with 2 NCAA titles, a winning record overall in NBA games he's coached, and who just finished in the top 5 in NBA coach of the year voting. To say nothing of the financial security someone who has been paid 7 figures plus a year for more than 20 or so years has. If he's making decisions because he's scared about job security that'd would be quite ridiculous.
User avatar
1bigfan13
Pro Prospect
Posts: 940
And1: 894
Joined: Jul 08, 2018
     

Re: WCQF: Oklahoma City Thunder vs Houston Rockets | P1 

Post#211 » by 1bigfan13 » Mon Aug 24, 2020 5:32 pm

Paul George made it worse on himself when he sent out that snarky Instagram post after Game 2. I don't think the backlash would be near this bad had he not sent out that condescending message.
User avatar
getrichordie
General Manager
Posts: 9,425
And1: 2,313
Joined: Oct 22, 2015
 

Re: WCQF: Oklahoma City Thunder vs Houston Rockets | P1 

Post#212 » by getrichordie » Mon Aug 24, 2020 5:36 pm

slick_watts wrote:the only reason the thunder have been good this season is the three guard lineup, with either adams or noel in it. billy's reluctance to move away from what got the thunder here is understandable. the blog boys who think this move is 'obvious' are not potential lame duck coaches who might need to find another job next season. playing small exclusively is a big risk to take when it excludes the lineup that basically owned the nba this season.


So close...
[twitter] @thunderdustin
User avatar
ThunderBolt
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,359
And1: 19,203
Joined: Dec 29, 2016
Location: Lynnwood, WA
   

Re: WCQF: Oklahoma City Thunder vs Houston Rockets | P1 

Post#213 » by ThunderBolt » Mon Aug 24, 2020 6:53 pm

Read on Twitter


Maybe a bit unnecessary.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
User avatar
Galloisdaman
Analyst
Posts: 3,674
And1: 2,171
Joined: Mar 17, 2011

Re: WCQF: Oklahoma City Thunder vs Houston Rockets | P1 

Post#214 » by Galloisdaman » Mon Aug 24, 2020 8:22 pm

Dort is playing his butt off but somebody has to tell him they are leaving him open at 3 on purpose. Tell him to move closer. :)
My eyes glaze over when reading alternative stat (not advanced stat) narratives that go many paragraphs long. If you can not make your point in 2 paragraphs it may not be a great point. :D
User avatar
Galloisdaman
Analyst
Posts: 3,674
And1: 2,171
Joined: Mar 17, 2011

Re: WCQF: Oklahoma City Thunder vs Houston Rockets | P1 

Post#215 » by Galloisdaman » Mon Aug 24, 2020 8:34 pm

I like Dort proving me wrong hitting that 3 :D

Team looking more confident offensively in this first quarter than any other first in this series. Still need better defense.

Refs may have missed a couple of foul calls.
My eyes glaze over when reading alternative stat (not advanced stat) narratives that go many paragraphs long. If you can not make your point in 2 paragraphs it may not be a great point. :D
User avatar
ThunderBolt
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,359
And1: 19,203
Joined: Dec 29, 2016
Location: Lynnwood, WA
   

Re: WCQF: Oklahoma City Thunder vs Houston Rockets | P1 

Post#216 » by ThunderBolt » Mon Aug 24, 2020 8:38 pm

We just can't have a good defender that isn't a tragedy on offense. :noway:
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
User avatar
ThunderBolt
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,359
And1: 19,203
Joined: Dec 29, 2016
Location: Lynnwood, WA
   

Re: WCQF: Oklahoma City Thunder vs Houston Rockets | P1 

Post#217 » by ThunderBolt » Mon Aug 24, 2020 8:45 pm

Bazley playing strong.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
User avatar
Galloisdaman
Analyst
Posts: 3,674
And1: 2,171
Joined: Mar 17, 2011

Re: WCQF: Oklahoma City Thunder vs Houston Rockets | P1 

Post#218 » by Galloisdaman » Mon Aug 24, 2020 8:55 pm

I'm probably imagining this but did both of Dennis free throws get counted? I thought the Rockets were up 4 (40-36) before the 2 FT and then after they were still up 3.
My eyes glaze over when reading alternative stat (not advanced stat) narratives that go many paragraphs long. If you can not make your point in 2 paragraphs it may not be a great point. :D
User avatar
ThunderBolt
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,359
And1: 19,203
Joined: Dec 29, 2016
Location: Lynnwood, WA
   

Re: WCQF: Oklahoma City Thunder vs Houston Rockets | P1 

Post#219 » by ThunderBolt » Mon Aug 24, 2020 8:57 pm

Galloisdaman wrote:I'm probably imagining this but did both of Dennis free throws get counted? I thought the Rockets were up 4 (40-36) before the 2 FT and then after they were still up 3.

Not sure. I'm still at work so catching what I can. Surely they did.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
User avatar
ThunderBolt
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,359
And1: 19,203
Joined: Dec 29, 2016
Location: Lynnwood, WA
   

Re: WCQF: Oklahoma City Thunder vs Houston Rockets | P1 

Post#220 » by ThunderBolt » Mon Aug 24, 2020 9:17 pm

We really need Paul to have a good half to win this.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?

Return to Oklahoma City Thunder