bondom34 wrote:On twitter trying to get Style and Alaska on here. Miss the DT crew.
You're never in the Discord!
Moderators: retrobro90, Dadouv47

bondom34 wrote:On twitter trying to get Style and Alaska on here. Miss the DT crew.
Andre Roberstan wrote:bondom34 wrote:On twitter trying to get Style and Alaska on here. Miss the DT crew.
You're never in the Discord!
thekaoswithin wrote:Andre Roberstan wrote:bondom34 wrote:On twitter trying to get Style and Alaska on here. Miss the DT crew.
You're never in the Discord!
we have a discord? some1 link pls

Pillendreher wrote:slick_watts wrote:it is certainly baffling that patterson can't get more minutes. i suspect that the thunder believe that for some reason jerami grant is better than him next to adams-- probably because he's athletic and allows them to switch / adds a rim protector. and it's obvious why they prefer anthony over patterson.
what a waste. we've wanted a guy like patterson for years and now that we have him he's the 10th man behind g-league scrubs.
Per nbawowy:
Grant Adams last season: 112.3 DRtG
Grant-Adams this season: 112.4 DRtG
Patterson-Adams: 92.1 DRtG
"Billy Donovan knows all the advanced stats"
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?

Andre Roberstan wrote:bondom34 wrote:On twitter trying to get Style and Alaska on here. Miss the DT crew.
You're never in the Discord!
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO

bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?

bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?

Knrstz wrote:Is there any metric that would show the effectiveness, or lack tbereof, of Adams switching onto opposing guards?


slick_watts wrote:Knrstz wrote:Is there any metric that would show the effectiveness, or lack tbereof, of Adams switching onto opposing guards?
probably second spectrum data available that may shed light on this. or maybe pnr ball handler synergy data? i wouldn't trust that. anyway, i'm guessing there's nothing public available. might be something interesting to look into, especially in fourth quarters with westbrook in the game as that seems when it's most employed.

Andre Roberstan wrote:slick_watts wrote:Knrstz wrote:Is there any metric that would show the effectiveness, or lack tbereof, of Adams switching onto opposing guards?
probably second spectrum data available that may shed light on this. or maybe pnr ball handler synergy data? i wouldn't trust that. anyway, i'm guessing there's nothing public available. might be something interesting to look into, especially in fourth quarters with westbrook in the game as that seems when it's most employed.
I don't trust it that much either, but for what it's worth, from my cursory look he ranks highly overall on both PnR and Isolation defense—but not so good on drives to the basket. Which makes sense, because that's likely when he gets the switch most of the time.
He's still not awful, but it's definitely not as good.

slick_watts wrote:i'd look into the video but i think that everyone could agree that adams being switched onto wings who can shoot and have a handle is not ideal.

Andre Roberstan wrote:slick_watts wrote:i'd look into the video but i think that everyone could agree that adams being switched onto wings who can shoot and have a handle is not ideal.
The DT subscription is only for stats, not video—or else I would.
And yeah, there was a lot of lazy switching last night. It looked like a team in a hard stretch of the schedule playing at the highest altitude in the NBA without their best defender—ideally you want more effort, but I can understand it.
slick_watts wrote:Andre Roberstan wrote:slick_watts wrote:i'd look into the video but i think that everyone could agree that adams being switched onto wings who can shoot and have a handle is not ideal.
The DT subscription is only for stats, not video—or else I would.
And yeah, there was a lot of lazy switching last night. It looked like a team in a hard stretch of the schedule playing at the highest altitude in the NBA without their best defender—ideally you want more effort, but I can understand it.
fatigue is a thing, but we're talking poor effort from the first whistle. the defense played a bit better at the end. they had enough in the tank to keep the nuggets below 120pp100 imo.
andre roberson is my 2nd favorite thunder player of all time but he's not worth 15pp100 on defense, no one is.

Andre Roberstan wrote:slick_watts wrote:Knrstz wrote:Is there any metric that would show the effectiveness, or lack tbereof, of Adams switching onto opposing guards?
probably second spectrum data available that may shed light on this. or maybe pnr ball handler synergy data? i wouldn't trust that. anyway, i'm guessing there's nothing public available. might be something interesting to look into, especially in fourth quarters with westbrook in the game as that seems when it's most employed.
I don't trust it that much either, but for what it's worth, from my cursory look he ranks highly overall on both PnR and Isolation defense—but not so good on drives to the basket. Which makes sense, because that's likely when he gets the switch most of the time.
He's still not awful, but it's definitely not as good.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?

Knrstz wrote:Andre Roberstan wrote:slick_watts wrote:
probably second spectrum data available that may shed light on this. or maybe pnr ball handler synergy data? i wouldn't trust that. anyway, i'm guessing there's nothing public available. might be something interesting to look into, especially in fourth quarters with westbrook in the game as that seems when it's most employed.
I don't trust it that much either, but for what it's worth, from my cursory look he ranks highly overall on both PnR and Isolation defense—but not so good on drives to the basket. Which makes sense, because that's likely when he gets the switch most of the time.
He's still not awful, but it's definitely not as good.
So by ranking highly in pNr defense but not good on drives to the basket it would seem to me that it’s not as much of a personnel issue as it issue a defensive philosophical one. Or am i interpreting that wrong?
slick_watts wrote:andre roberson is my 2nd favorite thunder player of all time but he's not worth 15pp100 on defense, no one is.
Minutes: 583|563
ORtG: 108.5|111.5
DRtG: 94.5|112.0
ORB%: 32.0|30.6
DRB%:82.0|75.3
PTS OFF TO per 100 poss: 22.0|16.0
2ND PTS per 100 poss:17.5|17.6
FBPS per 100 poss: 19.0|17.6
PITP: 49.2|46.2
opp PTS OFF TO per 100 poss: 15.6|14.2
opp 2ND PTS per 100 poss: 9.0|15.4
opp FBPS per 100 poss: 9.6|12.9
opp PITP per 100 poss: 39.6|44.2
eFG%: 52.7|53.7
FTr: 23.4|23.3
TO Ratio: 15.5|14.6
ORB%: 32.5|30.6
opp eFG%: 50.8|54.4
opp FTr: 20.0|27.1
opp TO Ratio: 19.3|14.0
opp ORB%: 18.0|24.7

Return to Oklahoma City Thunder