Thunder Offseason Thread

Moderators: retrobro90, Dadouv47

Kizz Fastfists
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,438
And1: 1,868
Joined: Jun 05, 2014
   

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread 

Post#281 » by Kizz Fastfists » Sat Apr 27, 2019 2:45 am

Dn4sty wrote:I seriously doubt Tolliver get anything more than a vet minimum.

I also don’t think this trade is crazy

Schroder and 21

For

Warren and 32



Last off-season Tolliver signed for the full tax MLE. What did he do that decreased his value? Why does Phoenix do that? They wouldn't give Atlanta anything for Schroder last year which is why he ended up in OKC with Atlanta buying out Melo. How did Schroder go from no value to Warren? Why does Phoenix want to get rid of Warren? If Phoenix ends up with the #2 pick they will likely draft Morant and have no need for a PG. If Cleveland gets #2 and Phoenix #3 then Phoenix still likely gets Morant unless Cleveland is going to draft Morant and trade Sexton. In which case Phoenix could throw #3 for Sexton and more picks and have a younger, cheaper and better PG then Schroder.
"The secret to success is to offend the greatest number of people." -George Bernard Shaw
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread 

Post#282 » by bondom34 » Sat Apr 27, 2019 2:55 am

Kizz Fastfists wrote:
Dn4sty wrote:I seriously doubt Tolliver get anything more than a vet minimum.

I also don’t think this trade is crazy

Schroder and 21

For

Warren and 32



Last off-season Tolliver signed for the full tax MLE. What did he do that decreased his value? Why does Phoenix do that? They wouldn't give Atlanta anything for Schroder last year which is why he ended up in OKC with Atlanta buying out Melo. How did Schroder go from no value to Warren? Why does Phoenix want to get rid of Warren? If Phoenix ends up with the #2 pick they will likely draft Morant and have no need for a PG. If Cleveland gets #2 and Phoenix #3 then Phoenix still likely gets Morant unless Cleveland is going to draft Morant and trade Sexton. In which case Phoenix could throw #3 for Sexton and more picks and have a younger, cheaper and better PG then Schroder.

I agree on the trade but Tolly didn't play much ans isn't that good. Min may be his market.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
Dn4sty
Analyst
Posts: 3,477
And1: 1,929
Joined: Apr 11, 2017

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread 

Post#283 » by Dn4sty » Sat Apr 27, 2019 3:32 am

bondom34 wrote:
Kizz Fastfists wrote:
Dn4sty wrote:I seriously doubt Tolliver get anything more than a vet minimum.

I also don’t think this trade is crazy

Schroder and 21

For

Warren and 32



Last off-season Tolliver signed for the full tax MLE. What did he do that decreased his value? Why does Phoenix do that? They wouldn't give Atlanta anything for Schroder last year which is why he ended up in OKC with Atlanta buying out Melo. How did Schroder go from no value to Warren? Why does Phoenix want to get rid of Warren? If Phoenix ends up with the #2 pick they will likely draft Morant and have no need for a PG. If Cleveland gets #2 and Phoenix #3 then Phoenix still likely gets Morant unless Cleveland is going to draft Morant and trade Sexton. In which case Phoenix could throw #3 for Sexton and more picks and have a younger, cheaper and better PG then Schroder.

I agree on the trade but Tolly didn't play much ans isn't that good. Min may be his market.


I think the trade is a bit ambitious for sure, yet Warren has struggled to stay healthy, we arent sure if he’s going to be able to replicate his 3 point success (sample size), and he block two players that Phoenix really needs to develop (Bridges and Jackson).

I say all of this as someone who is not a Schorder fan at all.
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread 

Post#284 » by bondom34 » Sat Apr 27, 2019 3:33 am

Dn4sty wrote:
bondom34 wrote:
Kizz Fastfists wrote:

Last off-season Tolliver signed for the full tax MLE. What did he do that decreased his value? Why does Phoenix do that? They wouldn't give Atlanta anything for Schroder last year which is why he ended up in OKC with Atlanta buying out Melo. How did Schroder go from no value to Warren? Why does Phoenix want to get rid of Warren? If Phoenix ends up with the #2 pick they will likely draft Morant and have no need for a PG. If Cleveland gets #2 and Phoenix #3 then Phoenix still likely gets Morant unless Cleveland is going to draft Morant and trade Sexton. In which case Phoenix could throw #3 for Sexton and more picks and have a younger, cheaper and better PG then Schroder.

I agree on the trade but Tolly didn't play much ans isn't that good. Min may be his market.


I think the trade is a bit ambitious for sure, yet Warren has struggled to stay healthy, we arent sure if he’s going to be able to replicate his 3 point success (sample size), and he block two players that Phoenix really needs to develop (Bridges and Jackson).

I say all of this as someone who is not a Schorder fan at all.

Agree on Warren, but his shot came around. The injuries are the question that could make you right though. Part of me wonders if Barton could be on the market too.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
Dn4sty
Analyst
Posts: 3,477
And1: 1,929
Joined: Apr 11, 2017

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread 

Post#285 » by Dn4sty » Sat Apr 27, 2019 3:44 am

bondom34 wrote:
Dn4sty wrote:
bondom34 wrote:I agree on the trade but Tolly didn't play much ans isn't that good. Min may be his market.


I think the trade is a bit ambitious for sure, yet Warren has struggled to stay healthy, we arent sure if he’s going to be able to replicate his 3 point success (sample size), and he block two players that Phoenix really needs to develop (Bridges and Jackson).

I say all of this as someone who is not a Schorder fan at all.

Agree on Warren, but his shot came around. The injuries are the question that could make you right though. Part of me wonders if Barton could be on the market too.


Also wonder if this deal is somewhat realistic

OKC gets Prince and pick 41 or 42 (although I’d shoot for pick 35)
Hawks get pick 21 and 2Pat
User avatar
Pillendreher
RealGM
Posts: 14,191
And1: 9,953
Joined: Jan 25, 2015
 

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread 

Post#286 » by Pillendreher » Sat Apr 27, 2019 8:30 am

What would Pricen's role be on this team? He's a Small Forward. We already feature one of those very prominently.
"I don't know of any player that, when the shot goes up, he doesn't want it to go in," Donovan said
CROklahoma
Junior
Posts: 451
And1: 130
Joined: Feb 22, 2017

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread 

Post#287 » by CROklahoma » Sat Apr 27, 2019 9:44 am

We need one more corner guys who do nothing but play defense and shoot 3s
wco81
RealGM
Posts: 26,851
And1: 11,467
Joined: Jul 04, 2013
       

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread 

Post#288 » by wco81 » Sat Apr 27, 2019 9:49 am

Price is a good young player. But the Thunder have big money committed to PG13 and Price is coming up for extension.

Main thing about him is if the Hawks are willing to give him away or take very little. They have a young core and he doesn't figure in their plans, apparently. Plus Bembry gave them some production this year and is going to be a lot cheaper for the next couple of years.
slick_watts
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,549
And1: 6,803
Joined: Jan 03, 2005
Location: Miami, FL

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread 

Post#289 » by slick_watts » Sat Apr 27, 2019 12:56 pm

i have my doubts that any team that could have acquired schroder for free last summer (e.g. phoenix) would have renewed interest this summer.
Dadouv47
Forum Mod - Thunder
Forum Mod - Thunder
Posts: 13,413
And1: 7,553
Joined: Mar 22, 2015
   

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread 

Post#290 » by Dadouv47 » Sat Apr 27, 2019 2:07 pm

Guess we will still try to go after Tyreke Evans but not sure it's worth it since he will want to have a big salary.
User avatar
SecondTake
Veteran
Posts: 2,671
And1: 1,493
Joined: Jun 03, 2017

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread 

Post#291 » by SecondTake » Sat Apr 27, 2019 2:17 pm

Just one?
CROklahoma wrote:We need one more corner guys who do nothing but play defense and shoot 3s


Sent from my SM-G950W using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
WestbrookGOATed
Analyst
Posts: 3,164
And1: 2,884
Joined: Apr 16, 2016
     

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread 

Post#292 » by WestbrookGOATed » Sat Apr 27, 2019 2:35 pm

I just want Billy Donovan gone. Then we should discuss what to do next. He is the main thing holding this team back.
Kizz Fastfists
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,438
And1: 1,868
Joined: Jun 05, 2014
   

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread 

Post#293 » by Kizz Fastfists » Sat Apr 27, 2019 2:50 pm

Best2EverDoIt wrote:I just want Billy Donovan gone. Then we should discuss what to do next. He is the main thing holding this team back.


Presti is the main thing holding this team back. Russ is the main thing from a team aspect holding them back. Donovan is the third problem if we are going to rank them in the order they are holding the team back. I put Russ ahead of Donovan because Russ is not going to change no matter who the coach is. A new coach doesn't change Russ. A new coach might bench Russ to try to force him to change, but then how well does that go over with fans, the front office, ownership, Russ, etc.? I loathe Billy as a coach, but I'm also not going to pretend that getting rid of him actually fixes anything. I do think that a real coach would make for a highly entertaining clash with Russ and the coach and how Presti handled it either confirm or shatter my current opinion on him as a weak GM who tries to cater to player egos over team winning.

A new coach that is fundamentally different than Donovan leads to a huge clash between the coach and Russ. When the coach comes out and says that OKC can't improve with Russ on the team who is the one that goes? I guarantee you Presti won't trade Russ given the fan sentiment and the number of fans that I have heard say they want Russ here until he retires no matter how inefficient his shooting gets. He is the triple double show and to some fans that makes him the best player in the NBA because the triple double got turned into some myth. It is a collection of 3 stats that without context tell you nothing of the good or bad impact a player is really having. Russ averaged a triple double, but by every impact measurable he just had one of the worst seasons of his career. He hadn't been this bad since his second season in the league.
"The secret to success is to offend the greatest number of people." -George Bernard Shaw
User avatar
SecondTake
Veteran
Posts: 2,671
And1: 1,493
Joined: Jun 03, 2017

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread 

Post#294 » by SecondTake » Sat Apr 27, 2019 2:59 pm

"Although the loss to Portland after a late year collapse would put most coaches under the hotseat, insiders within the Thunder organization believe that Donovans job is safe. We're told that the assistant coaching positions are being looked at with an eye towards a shakeup.

There has been friction between Donovan and members of the coaching staff who were advocating for lineup and offensive scheme adjustments that were ultimately rejected by Donovan. A big point of contention were the minutes being given to Schroder which coaching staff wanted to see reduced. Donovan considered him a starter coming off the bench, and believed that he would be a difference maker in the playoffs.

A roster shakeup isn't expected either. There's a belief within the organization that had defensive specialist Andre been healthy this team would have been headed towards the Western Conference Finals. Although it's too early to tell, it doesn't look like the Thunder are looking at making major changes this offseason."
Dadouv47
Forum Mod - Thunder
Forum Mod - Thunder
Posts: 13,413
And1: 7,553
Joined: Mar 22, 2015
   

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread 

Post#295 » by Dadouv47 » Sat Apr 27, 2019 3:03 pm

SecondTake wrote:"Although the loss to Portland after a late year collapse would put most coaches under the hotseat, insiders within the Thunder organization believe that Donovans job is safe. We're told that the assistant coaching positions are being looked at with an eye towards a shakeup.

There has been friction between Donovan and members of the coaching staff who were advocating for lineup and offensive scheme adjustments that were ultimately rejected by Donovan. A big point of contention were the minutes being given to Schroder which coaching staff wanted to see reduced. Donovan considered him a starter coming off the bench, and believed that he would be a difference maker in the playoffs.

A roster shakeup isn't expected either. There's a belief within the organization that had defensive specialist Andre been healthy this team would have been headed towards the Western Conference Finals. Although it's too early to tell, it doesn't look like the Thunder are looking at making major changes this offseason."


Assistants are right to be frustrated about the inexistence of offensive schemes.

Can't blame Donovan for playing Schroeder so much during the playoffs though. Ferguson was beyond terrible and we had no other option coming from the bench (and I hate Schroeder)
Kizz Fastfists
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,438
And1: 1,868
Joined: Jun 05, 2014
   

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread 

Post#296 » by Kizz Fastfists » Sat Apr 27, 2019 3:05 pm

No changes! AWESOME!!! Don't get off that treadmill Donovan. Wait for it to come to an abrupt halt and throw you off with the team missing the playoffs. While old Roberson would have been the 3rd best player on the team this year, and arguably 2nd best, what I expect to get from Roberson when he returns is closer to Burton than old Roberson.
"The secret to success is to offend the greatest number of people." -George Bernard Shaw
Dadouv47
Forum Mod - Thunder
Forum Mod - Thunder
Posts: 13,413
And1: 7,553
Joined: Mar 22, 2015
   

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread 

Post#297 » by Dadouv47 » Sat Apr 27, 2019 3:06 pm

Kizz Fastfists wrote:
Best2EverDoIt wrote:I just want Billy Donovan gone. Then we should discuss what to do next. He is the main thing holding this team back.


Presti is the main thing holding this team back. Russ is the main thing from a team aspect holding them back. Donovan is the third problem if we are going to rank them in the order they are holding the team back. I put Russ ahead of Donovan because Russ is not going to change no matter who the coach is. A new coach doesn't change Russ. A new coach might bench Russ to try to force him to change, but then how well does that go over with fans, the front office, ownership, Russ, etc.? I loathe Billy as a coach, but I'm also not going to pretend that getting rid of him actually fixes anything. I do think that a real coach would make for a highly entertaining clash with Russ and the coach and how Presti handled it either confirm or shatter my current opinion on him as a weak GM who tries to cater to player egos over team winning.

A new coach that is fundamentally different than Donovan leads to a huge clash between the coach and Russ. When the coach comes out and says that OKC can't improve with Russ on the team who is the one that goes? I guarantee you Presti won't trade Russ given the fan sentiment and the number of fans that I have heard say they want Russ here until he retires no matter how inefficient his shooting gets. He is the triple double show and to some fans that makes him the best player in the NBA because the triple double got turned into some myth. It is a collection of 3 stats that without context tell you nothing of the good or bad impact a player is really having. Russ averaged a triple double, but by every impact measurable he just had one of the worst seasons of his career. He hadn't been this bad since his second season in the league.


Agree but think Presti is the main issue by a wild margin. Despite having a terrible shooting season, if you give Westbrook some shooters, his lack of shooting won't have such a bad impact.
And if we want to talk about players, Adams was the biggest disappointment during the playoffs in my opinion (and I'm one of the few here always trying to defend him)
Kizz Fastfists
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,438
And1: 1,868
Joined: Jun 05, 2014
   

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread 

Post#298 » by Kizz Fastfists » Sat Apr 27, 2019 3:26 pm

Dadouv47 wrote:Despite having a terrible shooting season, if you give Westbrook some shooters, his lack of shooting won't have such a bad impact.


I disagree with this. If you add a few better shooters then there are more made shots on his passes. However, he will still be taking 20 shots a game while shooting 40% and 5 three point shots a game shooting 28%. Also, keep in mind that the Thunder only have to improve 2% to be in the top 5 in 3pt shooting. That is 2 more makes per 100 shots. At 30 a game that means less than 1 more made 3 per game.

You could put the best 3pt shooter at every position around Russ and he is still going to take his shots. If it was about getting the team the best shot he would have been doing that this year with 3 players in the starting lineup that shot over 36% from 3! More shooting would be nice, but we need to stop pretending that Russ didn't play the majority of his minutes with capable 3pt shooters and he STILL took as many stupid shots as he felt like.
"The secret to success is to offend the greatest number of people." -George Bernard Shaw
slick_watts
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,549
And1: 6,803
Joined: Jan 03, 2005
Location: Miami, FL

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread 

Post#299 » by slick_watts » Sat Apr 27, 2019 3:50 pm

yes. westbrook's poor shooting will only hurt the team less if he decides to shoot less often (or, he improves his shooting). there's been some variability over the last five seasons with westbrook's shot attempts but he's always been at or near the top fga per possession. it would be a drastic change for him if he reduced his fga enough that it's going to have any significant impact.

and no matter what you do with the roster, westbrook as the primary ball handler will increasingly result in drop pnr and other defensive strategies to coax him or leave him in space. so long as he's shooting like this / god forbid he gets worse.
User avatar
Pillendreher
RealGM
Posts: 14,191
And1: 9,953
Joined: Jan 25, 2015
 

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread 

Post#300 » by Pillendreher » Sat Apr 27, 2019 4:10 pm

SecondTake wrote:"Although the loss to Portland after a late year collapse would put most coaches under the hotseat, insiders within the Thunder organization believe that Donovans job is safe. We're told that the assistant coaching positions are being looked at with an eye towards a shakeup.

There has been friction between Donovan and members of the coaching staff who were advocating for lineup and offensive scheme adjustments that were ultimately rejected by Donovan. A big point of contention were the minutes being given to Schroder which coaching staff wanted to see reduced. Donovan considered him a starter coming off the bench, and believed that he would be a difference maker in the playoffs.

A roster shakeup isn't expected either. There's a belief within the organization that had defensive specialist Andre been healthy this team would have been headed towards the Western Conference Finals. Although it's too early to tell, it doesn't look like the Thunder are looking at making major changes this offseason."


Either provide a source for this or I'm going to report it for yet another post with made up quotes/content. Zero search results for anything in this post.
"I don't know of any player that, when the shot goes up, he doesn't want it to go in," Donovan said

Return to Oklahoma City Thunder