2018 Offseason Thread

Moderators: Dadouv47, retrobro90

User avatar
spearsy23
RealGM
Posts: 19,481
And1: 7,654
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
   

Re: 2018 Offseason Thread 

Post#3701 » by spearsy23 » Fri Sep 21, 2018 4:56 pm

Knrstz wrote:
slick_watts wrote:
Pillendreher wrote:
This is the 4th pic I'm getting in a "Knrstz" image search:

Image


Krnstz has 30 minutes to explain or i will consider this his response.

In my defense, that’s not my good side.

Disagree.
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
User avatar
Pillendreher
RealGM
Posts: 14,191
And1: 9,953
Joined: Jan 25, 2015
 

Re: 2018 Offseason Thread 

Post#3702 » by Pillendreher » Sat Sep 22, 2018 9:47 am

Any chance we could get into the Butler conversation without offering Adams? Probably not. :(
"I don't know of any player that, when the shot goes up, he doesn't want it to go in," Donovan said
User avatar
ThunderBolt
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,368
And1: 19,237
Joined: Dec 29, 2016
Location: Lynnwood, WA
   

Re: 2018 Offseason Thread 

Post#3703 » by ThunderBolt » Sat Sep 22, 2018 11:23 am

Pillendreher wrote:Any chance we could get into the Butler conversation without offering Adams? Probably not. :(

The would probably be interested in George.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
User avatar
Pillendreher
RealGM
Posts: 14,191
And1: 9,953
Joined: Jan 25, 2015
 

Re: 2018 Offseason Thread 

Post#3704 » by Pillendreher » Sat Sep 22, 2018 12:05 pm

Knrstz wrote:
Pillendreher wrote:Any chance we could get into the Butler conversation without offering Adams? Probably not. :(

The would probably be interested in George.


You're turning into slick_watts. :noway:
"I don't know of any player that, when the shot goes up, he doesn't want it to go in," Donovan said
User avatar
ThunderBolt
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,368
And1: 19,237
Joined: Dec 29, 2016
Location: Lynnwood, WA
   

Re: 2018 Offseason Thread 

Post#3705 » by ThunderBolt » Sat Sep 22, 2018 12:20 pm

Pillendreher wrote:
Knrstz wrote:
Pillendreher wrote:Any chance we could get into the Butler conversation without offering Adams? Probably not. :(

The would probably be interested in George.


You're turning into slick_watts. :noway:

If we aren’t trading Adams, what else could we offer? We are out of picks and Ferguson hasn’t shown enough to be the main trade piece. If they liked Diallo that much they could have taken him themselves. If they like schroder, what do they do with Teague? Pre-Injury robes would have been a great fit but why would Minnesota risk that?
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
User avatar
Pillendreher
RealGM
Posts: 14,191
And1: 9,953
Joined: Jan 25, 2015
 

Re: 2018 Offseason Thread 

Post#3706 » by Pillendreher » Sat Sep 22, 2018 12:24 pm

Knrstz wrote:
Pillendreher wrote:
Knrstz wrote:The would probably be interested in George.


You're turning into slick_watts. :noway:

If we aren’t trading Adams, what else could we offer? We are out of picks and Ferguson hasn’t shown enough to be the main trade piece. If they liked Diallo that much they could have taken him themselves. If they like schroder, what do they do with Teague? Pre-Injury robes would have been a great fit but why would Minnesota risk that?


Based on some of those trades that Zach Lowe and Matt Moore proposed, you could probably offer Grant+Roberson+Ferguson+x, but we can't trade Grant (yet) and I somewhat doubt Butler's return is going to be that low.
"I don't know of any player that, when the shot goes up, he doesn't want it to go in," Donovan said
User avatar
ThunderBolt
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,368
And1: 19,237
Joined: Dec 29, 2016
Location: Lynnwood, WA
   

Re: 2018 Offseason Thread 

Post#3707 » by ThunderBolt » Sat Sep 22, 2018 12:41 pm

Pillendreher wrote:
Knrstz wrote:
Pillendreher wrote:
You're turning into slick_watts. :noway:

If we aren’t trading Adams, what else could we offer? We are out of picks and Ferguson hasn’t shown enough to be the main trade piece. If they liked Diallo that much they could have taken him themselves. If they like schroder, what do they do with Teague? Pre-Injury robes would have been a great fit but why would Minnesota risk that?


Based on some of those trades that Zach Lowe and Matt Moore proposed, you could probably offer Grant+Roberson+Ferguson+x, but we can't trade Grant (yet) and I somewhat doubt Butler's return is going to be that low.

One problem thati see is that Ferguson doesn’t have the same value as a first round pick right now. He still has value but he showed very little his rookie year. As soon as those guys are drafted their value starts to drop unless they show something. If Ferguson has a couple of really good games or start the year, his value will skyrocket quickly.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
User avatar
spearsy23
RealGM
Posts: 19,481
And1: 7,654
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
   

Re: 2018 Offseason Thread 

Post#3708 » by spearsy23 » Sat Sep 22, 2018 5:10 pm

Knrstz wrote:One problem thati see is that Ferguson doesn’t have the same value as a first round pick right now. He still has value but he showed very little his rookie year. As soon as those guys are drafted their value starts to drop unless they show something.

I think this is technically true, but not as concrete as commonly accepted. I don't think a guy like Ferg really loses value in a year, and teams who were high on him coming in are still going to view him the same. In fact, I'd bet him getting significant minutes on a good team helped his stick in several places. the problem is that right now we're dealing in unknowns and any pick could be a lotto ticket. If the warriors were offering their first I don't think many teams take it over ferguson.
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
thekaoswithin
Junior
Posts: 384
And1: 240
Joined: Apr 27, 2017
   

Re: 2018 Offseason Thread 

Post#3709 » by thekaoswithin » Sat Sep 22, 2018 6:29 pm

If we're serious about winning, Adams + Ferg for Butler has to be offered. Adams is great but Butler could be the piece that puts us over the edge.
User avatar
spearsy23
RealGM
Posts: 19,481
And1: 7,654
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
   

Re: 2018 Offseason Thread 

Post#3710 » by spearsy23 » Sat Sep 22, 2018 6:47 pm

Russ/Jimmy/PG is probably a whole lesser than the sum of the parts thing. I think that's what is so frustrating about Golden State, not only do they have this incredible collection of talent, but that fit together perfectly. A defense of Russ/Butler/robes/George/Noel would be insanity though.
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
RalphSampsonJr
Pro Prospect
Posts: 952
And1: 584
Joined: Jul 18, 2017
 

Re: 2018 Offseason Thread 

Post#3711 » by RalphSampsonJr » Sat Sep 22, 2018 8:30 pm

Sam isnt gonna give up Adams for a rental in Jimmy.
Wolves arent going to trade Jimmy for Adams when their main guy is the same position.
I dont think Jimmy would get you there anyway.
User avatar
Pillendreher
RealGM
Posts: 14,191
And1: 9,953
Joined: Jan 25, 2015
 

Re: 2018 Offseason Thread 

Post#3712 » by Pillendreher » Sat Sep 22, 2018 8:59 pm

RalphSampsonJr wrote:Sam isnt gonna give up Adams for a rental in Jimmy.


The idea of course is that he'd stay as well.
"I don't know of any player that, when the shot goes up, he doesn't want it to go in," Donovan said
RalphSampsonJr
Pro Prospect
Posts: 952
And1: 584
Joined: Jul 18, 2017
 

Re: 2018 Offseason Thread 

Post#3713 » by RalphSampsonJr » Sat Sep 22, 2018 10:50 pm

Pillendreher wrote:
RalphSampsonJr wrote:Sam isnt gonna give up Adams for a rental in Jimmy.


The idea of course is that he'd stay as well.


Yea but theres still the hurdle of the wolves wanting to take on Adams. which they wouldnt. not when 20 other teams could give them picks and guards.
Kizz Fastfists
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,451
And1: 1,877
Joined: Jun 05, 2014
   

Re: 2018 Offseason Thread 

Post#3714 » by Kizz Fastfists » Sun Sep 23, 2018 3:33 am

RalphSampsonJr wrote:Yea but theres still the hurdle of the wolves wanting to take on Adams. which they wouldnt. not when 20 other teams could give them picks and guards.


They don't want picks. They also want to attach Dieng's salary to Butler. Adams, Roberson, Ferguson for Butler and Dieng makes a lot of sense for both teams. KAT is a 40% volume 3pt shooter!!! Adams gives them hard nosed interior defense and KAT gives them great offense at PF. You can even include Patterson and Taj if Minny wants more stretching ability.

The problem I see with the above is that ownership is handling the trade and not Thibs. So I think ownership will try to find some sort of splash, although I don't think there is any to be had. I don't know what ends up being traded for Butler, but I think Adams, Roberson and Ferguson for Butler and Dieng will end up being a competitive offer and given how Thibs coaches would actually make Minny very interesting. Thibs would have a great defense and better offensive players than he had in Chicago.
"The secret to success is to offend the greatest number of people." -George Bernard Shaw
RalphSampsonJr
Pro Prospect
Posts: 952
And1: 584
Joined: Jul 18, 2017
 

Re: 2018 Offseason Thread 

Post#3715 » by RalphSampsonJr » Sun Sep 23, 2018 4:04 am

Kizz Fastfists wrote:
RalphSampsonJr wrote:Yea but theres still the hurdle of the wolves wanting to take on Adams. which they wouldnt. not when 20 other teams could give them picks and guards.


They don't want picks. They also want to attach Dieng's salary to Butler. Adams, Roberson, Ferguson for Butler and Dieng makes a lot of sense for both teams. KAT is a 40% volume 3pt shooter!!! Adams gives them hard nosed interior defense and KAT gives them great offense at PF. You can even include Patterson and Taj if Minny wants more stretching ability.

The problem I see with the above is that ownership is handling the trade and not Thibs. So I think ownership will try to find some sort of splash, although I don't think there is any to be had. I don't know what ends up being traded for Butler, but I think Adams, Roberson and Ferguson for Butler and Dieng will end up being a competitive offer and given how Thibs coaches would actually make Minny very interesting. Thibs would have a great defense and better offensive players than he had in Chicago.


So a team with no shooting wants more non shooters? and the main guy you just signed a 190 mil extension will now get forced to play another position? they will have Wiggins Adams and Towns making how much?! Wolves are a terrible franchise but i dont think they are that silly
wco81
RealGM
Posts: 27,077
And1: 11,556
Joined: Jul 04, 2013
       

Re: 2018 Offseason Thread 

Post#3716 » by wco81 » Sun Sep 23, 2018 4:06 am

Sounds like the Wolves owner was unwilling to pay KAT AND Butler, so Butler wants out, to a team who will max him out.
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: 2018 Offseason Thread 

Post#3717 » by bondom34 » Sun Sep 23, 2018 4:23 am

Not sure I see that. Butler just wanted out.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
wco81
RealGM
Posts: 27,077
And1: 11,556
Joined: Jul 04, 2013
       

Re: 2018 Offseason Thread 

Post#3718 » by wco81 » Sun Sep 23, 2018 4:36 am

But there’s a narrative that he has written off Wiggins and KAT, didn’t think he could win with them.

Yet he’s willing to go to 3 non playoffs teams, which all happen to have cap space?

If being a rental for a playoffs team which doesn’t plan to sign him long term is something he would consider ...

But obviously the Wolves will try to get the best return.
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: 2018 Offseason Thread 

Post#3719 » by bondom34 » Sun Sep 23, 2018 5:50 am

Those teams can sign another player to become good.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
User avatar
Pillendreher
RealGM
Posts: 14,191
And1: 9,953
Joined: Jan 25, 2015
 

Re: 2018 Offseason Thread 

Post#3720 » by Pillendreher » Sun Sep 23, 2018 8:43 am

I don't think they're getting complete crap, but given his contract, his lockerroom problems and the fact that they apparently want to get him to another team within the next coupe of hours, I don't see them getting anything better than a player of Adams' quality and something in addition to that. It's most likely not going to be Adams, but it wouldn't surprise me if all they got was a mediocre starter and a little extra. When you're this dysfunctional (who on earth is leaking all of that to Woj?!), you're not going to get the best deal out there.
"I don't know of any player that, when the shot goes up, he doesn't want it to go in," Donovan said

Return to Oklahoma City Thunder