2018 Offseason Thread

Moderators: Dadouv47, retrobro90

User avatar
Thabo Sefolosha
Thunder Forum The Opening Tip
Posts: 3,427
And1: 6,667
Joined: Oct 29, 2013
 

Re: 2018 Offseason Thread 

Post#3741 » by Thabo Sefolosha » Mon Sep 24, 2018 3:50 pm

bondom34 wrote:The roster is full correct?

Edit: I meant the RS roster, not the 20 man. Like they couldn't add a min guy w/o a cut, by my count they can't.

1 more slot
Image
User avatar
Pillendreher
RealGM
Posts: 14,191
And1: 9,953
Joined: Jan 25, 2015
 

Re: 2018 Offseason Thread 

Post#3742 » by Pillendreher » Mon Sep 24, 2018 8:21 pm

slick_watts wrote:so you prefer richardson, you don't want either johnson not because they're worse than schroder but because you don't trust donovan to use them correctly


That's the main reason yes. Furthermore though, I don't partake in James Johnson sweepstakes. A guy that has been in and out of the league for most of his career and has only found a clear and bigger role under Spoelstra is making all kinds of alarm bells go off for me, especially given his age (he turns 32 in a couple of months) and the fact that he's getting double figures as a role player. So no, I don't think James Johnson is better per se.

slick_watts wrote:and you don't want olynyk because we don't need more big men.


Yes. But even if we needed a backup big, I'd be very weary of his contract. And look: The same goes for Schröder, obviously. I'm curious as to wether this upcoming season will show us that he's a good backup PG or not. He has his flaws, he has his strengths. I hope he loses the attitude (the last couple of years it looked like fame and fast cars were more important than being) and they find a way to make it work with Westbrook.
"I don't know of any player that, when the shot goes up, he doesn't want it to go in," Donovan said
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: 2018 Offseason Thread 

Post#3743 » by bondom34 » Mon Sep 24, 2018 8:24 pm

Pillendreher wrote:
slick_watts wrote:so you prefer richardson, you don't want either johnson not because they're worse than schroder but because you don't trust donovan to use them correctly


That's the main reason yes. Furthermore though, I don't partake in James Johnson sweepstakes. A guy that has been in and out of the league for most of his career and has only found a clear and bigger role under Spoelstra is making all kinds of alarm bells go off for me, especially given his age (he turns 32 in a couple of months) and the fact that he's getting double figures as a role player. So no, I don't think James Johnson is better per se.

slick_watts wrote:and you don't want olynyk because we don't need more big men.


Yes. But even if we needed a backup big, I'd be very weary of his contract. And look: The same goes for Schröder, obviously. I'm curious as to wether this upcoming season will show us that he's a good backup PG or not. He has his flaws, he has his strengths. I hope he loses the attitude (the last couple of years it looked like fame and fast cars were more important than being) and they find a way to make it work with Westbrook.

Olynk's contract is excellent, he was Miami's best big last year and is around $10M a year locked up. And Johnson was pretty solid for Toronto as well.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
User avatar
ThunderBolt
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,368
And1: 19,237
Joined: Dec 29, 2016
Location: Lynnwood, WA
   

Re: 2018 Offseason Thread 

Post#3744 » by ThunderBolt » Tue Sep 25, 2018 1:02 am

Too many good media quotes to be this dead here. I fully expect Nader to be MIP after this gem:
Nader said he spent this summer having a surgery to fix a Ulna Fracture in his forearm. He mentioned unbeknownst to him, that he has dealt with this fracture since he was 16 year old. He finally got it fixed up and he feels “Better than ever.”

https://thunderousintentions.com/2018/09/24/okc-thunder-media-day-abdel-nader-compete-dont-compare/
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: 2018 Offseason Thread 

Post#3745 » by bondom34 » Tue Sep 25, 2018 1:04 am

MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
User avatar
ThunderBolt
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,368
And1: 19,237
Joined: Dec 29, 2016
Location: Lynnwood, WA
   

Re: 2018 Offseason Thread 

Post#3746 » by ThunderBolt » Tue Sep 25, 2018 1:10 am

On Kawhi Leonard:

An interesting comment made by George centered around Kawhi Leonard and their friendship. George told him to stay open to his current situation (with Raptors). PG13 noted both players had planned on going home to play in California, but things changed. That comment cements just how much the original intention was for Paul George to go home and play for the Lakers.

https://thunderousintentions.com/2018/09/24/okc-thunder-media-day-i-loved-it-here-this-is-home/
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
User avatar
ThunderBolt
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,368
And1: 19,237
Joined: Dec 29, 2016
Location: Lynnwood, WA
   

Re: 2018 Offseason Thread 

Post#3747 » by ThunderBolt » Tue Sep 25, 2018 2:28 am

bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
User avatar
ThunderBolt
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,368
And1: 19,237
Joined: Dec 29, 2016
Location: Lynnwood, WA
   

Re: 2018 Offseason Thread 

Post#3748 » by ThunderBolt » Tue Sep 25, 2018 11:54 am

Adams is a great interview. Schroder seems willing to play however he’s asked. He made a but of a snide remark to Horne when he asked about his legal issues. Most of the time I don’t like the media but the local media is pretty soft. It’s not Horne’s fault that he beat a guy senseless.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
alessandrux
Starter
Posts: 2,046
And1: 2,239
Joined: Dec 25, 2015

Re: 2018 Offseason Thread 

Post#3749 » by alessandrux » Tue Sep 25, 2018 5:52 pm

Knrstz wrote:Adams is a great interview. Schroder seems willing to play however he’s asked. He made a but of a snide remark to Horne when he asked about his legal issues. Most of the time I don’t like the media but the local media is pretty soft. It’s not Horne’s fault that he beat a guy senseless.


I'm a bit wary about Schröders answers (not about his legal case; he is probably right in not wanting to answer anything about it).

He sounds like it is not that clear that he will come off the bench ( I'm paraphrasing here: ''Im willing to do anything to help [even] come off the bench'', makes it sound like it is not clearly communicated that HE WILL come off the bench).
Makes me a bit uncomfortable, because his expectations about his role seem to not align perfectly with the expectations ( I have) of his role.

The Adams one is the only other one I completely watched, where he doesn't say that much (but his fun personality shines through).
Thanks for posting it here.
User avatar
Pillendreher
RealGM
Posts: 14,191
And1: 9,953
Joined: Jan 25, 2015
 

Re: 2018 Offseason Thread 

Post#3750 » by Pillendreher » Tue Sep 25, 2018 6:24 pm

alessandrux wrote:He sounds like it is not that clear that he will come off the bench ( I'm paraphrasing here: ''Im willing to do anything to help [even] come off the bench'', makes it sound like it is not clearly communicated that HE WILL come off the bench).
Makes me a bit uncomfortable, because his expectations about his role seem to not align perfectly with the expectations ( I have) of his role.


He said as much in an interview surrounding the German National Team: The Thunder promised him starter minutes and that he was on the floor in the 4th quarter, so even though they didn't tell him wether he was starting or not, as long as he got the minutes, that didn't matter as much to him.
"I don't know of any player that, when the shot goes up, he doesn't want it to go in," Donovan said
User avatar
ThunderBolt
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,368
And1: 19,237
Joined: Dec 29, 2016
Location: Lynnwood, WA
   

Re: 2018 Offseason Thread 

Post#3751 » by ThunderBolt » Tue Sep 25, 2018 6:38 pm

Royce just said he thinks billy will lean to starting Ferguson at the beginning of the year. Royce isn’t too high on ferg. He is very impressed with dialogue. Experts Patterson to get the nod over grant.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
User avatar
Pillendreher
RealGM
Posts: 14,191
And1: 9,953
Joined: Jan 25, 2015
 

Re: 2018 Offseason Thread 

Post#3752 » by Pillendreher » Tue Sep 25, 2018 8:25 pm

Knrstz wrote:Royce just said he thinks billy will lean to starting Ferguson at the beginning of the year. Royce isn’t too high on ferg. He is very impressed with dialogue. Experts Patterson to get the nod over grant.


I don't even think the starters matter all that much. I fully expect Donovan to find a way to **** up rotations regardless of the starters. Patterson could start and get 15 minutes while Grant comes off the bench and is our 3rd option at 35 minutes a night.
"I don't know of any player that, when the shot goes up, he doesn't want it to go in," Donovan said
User avatar
retrobro90
Forum Mod - Thunder
Forum Mod - Thunder
Posts: 1,342
And1: 942
Joined: Jan 21, 2017
 

Re: 2018 Offseason Thread 

Post#3753 » by retrobro90 » Tue Sep 25, 2018 9:39 pm

Knrstz wrote:He is very impressed with dialogue.


Dialogue? Diallo?

Just a hunch and I've said this before on here: I think TLC is our starting SG until Roberson comes back.
User avatar
Pillendreher
RealGM
Posts: 14,191
And1: 9,953
Joined: Jan 25, 2015
 

Re: 2018 Offseason Thread 

Post#3754 » by Pillendreher » Tue Sep 25, 2018 9:47 pm

retrobro90 wrote:
Knrstz wrote:He is very impressed with dialogue.


Dialogue? Diallo?

Just a hunch and I've said this before on here: I think TLC is our starting SG until Roberson comes back.


Let me tell you who will start at the 2:

Image
"I don't know of any player that, when the shot goes up, he doesn't want it to go in," Donovan said
User avatar
ThunderBolt
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,368
And1: 19,237
Joined: Dec 29, 2016
Location: Lynnwood, WA
   

Re: 2018 Offseason Thread 

Post#3755 » by ThunderBolt » Tue Sep 25, 2018 10:03 pm

retrobro90 wrote:
Knrstz wrote:He is very impressed with dialogue.


Dialogue? Diallo?

Just a hunch and I've said this before on here: I think TLC is our starting SG until Roberson comes back.

Yea. Stupid auto correct. FWIW, Apparently he was draining uncontested threes in practice. I think Dre is known to be pretty deadly in practice too
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
slick_watts
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,562
And1: 6,820
Joined: Jan 03, 2005
Location: Miami, FL

Re: 2018 Offseason Thread 

Post#3756 » by slick_watts » Wed Sep 26, 2018 2:18 am

starting patterson is the big one. they can't mess that up. patterson basically laid out the argument during his interview. i'd be ok with ferguson starting. he sucks, but it's not like the other options are light years better, and it's worth a little time to see where he's at. i'd give him a quick hook though if it doesn't work out and either replace with abrines or tlc.

i don't get the diallo hype. plenty of time to see where he's at.
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: 2018 Offseason Thread 

Post#3757 » by bondom34 » Wed Sep 26, 2018 2:40 am

Agree with everything J said, but I don't know enough to say who should start at 2. I'd debate Diallo, I still think he's a better prospect than Ferg. But I'd have to see what happens in practice.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
User avatar
Old Man Game
Head Coach
Posts: 6,281
And1: 4,317
Joined: Jul 15, 2012

Re: 2018 Offseason Thread 

Post#3758 » by Old Man Game » Wed Sep 26, 2018 4:25 am

Pillendreher wrote:
retrobro90 wrote:
Knrstz wrote:He is very impressed with dialogue.


Dialogue? Diallo?

Just a hunch and I've said this before on here: I think TLC is our starting SG until Roberson comes back.


Let me tell you who will start at the 2:

Image
This was good. I laughed.

Sent from my Pixel using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
Old Man Game
Head Coach
Posts: 6,281
And1: 4,317
Joined: Jul 15, 2012

Re: 2018 Offseason Thread 

Post#3759 » by Old Man Game » Wed Sep 26, 2018 4:26 am

Knrstz wrote:
retrobro90 wrote:
Knrstz wrote:He is very impressed with dialogue.


Dialogue? Diallo?

Just a hunch and I've said this before on here: I think TLC is our starting SG until Roberson comes back.

Yea. Stupid auto correct. FWIW, Apparently he was draining uncontested threes in practice. I think Dre is known to be pretty deadly in practice too
Motion to just call him Ham.

Sent from my Pixel using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
Old Man Game
Head Coach
Posts: 6,281
And1: 4,317
Joined: Jul 15, 2012

Re: 2018 Offseason Thread 

Post#3760 » by Old Man Game » Wed Sep 26, 2018 4:27 am

slick_watts wrote:starting patterson is the big one. they can't mess that up. patterson basically laid out the argument during his interview. i'd be ok with ferguson starting. he sucks, but it's not like the other options are light years better, and it's worth a little time to see where he's at. i'd give him a quick hook though if it doesn't work out and either replace with abrines or tlc.

i don't get the diallo hype. plenty of time to see where he's at.
Sort of got that pj3 level preseason hype train.

Sent from my Pixel using RealGM mobile app

Return to Oklahoma City Thunder