OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening

Moderators: Dadouv47, retrobro90

User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#41 » by bondom34 » Wed Apr 26, 2017 8:08 pm

Dn4sty wrote:
Andre Roberstan wrote:
Dn4sty wrote:I'm against the blow it up approach (at least initially). So here goes my plan. The intent is to keep most of the roster intact but to add players that could be cheaper options than both Adams and Dipo.

So Kanter would be moved into someone's cap space and I hope I get something of decent value in return. Sabonis can IMO step into Kanters role next season and provide 75% of what he Kanter did

Trade 1- a future second round pick and Christon for Sean Kilpatrick. Kilpatrick skill set is similar to Dipo and as after next season he's a UFA. If he can grow his game and provide 75-80% of what Dipo provides (he might even provide everything that Dipo does).

Trade 2- Singler and 2nd round pick for Dwight Powell. Can powell do what Adams does for 8 million per year?

Draft- Donovan Mitchell. He and Sean Kilpatrick can likely duplicate Dipo's production.

Re-sign Taj, re-sign Roberson.

Yes the tax bill would be massive, but the hope is that whatever you add at C or SG can give you the same production that you get from Dipo and Adams. This would allow you to potentially move one or both at the trade deadline or next summer.

In an ideal world you replace Adams/Dipo/Kanter with similar production for way less than half of what you pay those guys now.

In this scenario you would for sure pay the tax one year, but the plan would be to dump at least one of Dipo/Adams to avoid paying the tax a second time.

Powell could be another player but the idea is the same. I'd also be ok with just targeting one of these areas (prob SG). The goal would be to get the same production (maybe better) than Dipo with Kilpatrick and Mitchell.

You'd then move Dipo for future assets/cap space


I'm sorry, Kilpatrick and Powell are NOT Oladipo or Adams replacements. Kilpatrick's a decent player, but he's closer to Monta than Dipo.


I agree that Powell is a stretch. However I think Kilpatrick and Donovan Mitchell (draft pick) would likely give you almost the exact same production as Dipo and it would be WAY cheaper even after you re-sign Kilpatrick.

I'd vehemently disagree.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
User avatar
Pillendreher
RealGM
Posts: 14,191
And1: 9,953
Joined: Jan 25, 2015
 

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#42 » by Pillendreher » Wed Apr 26, 2017 8:11 pm

Read on Twitter


Hopefully it will pay off.

Read on Twitter


Let's hope we can work something out.
"I don't know of any player that, when the shot goes up, he doesn't want it to go in," Donovan said
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#43 » by bondom34 » Wed Apr 26, 2017 8:12 pm

I think Kanter's gotta be gone. The rest mostly stay I'd guess, except whatever happens w/ FAs.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
Dn4sty
Analyst
Posts: 3,477
And1: 1,929
Joined: Apr 11, 2017

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#44 » by Dn4sty » Wed Apr 26, 2017 8:16 pm

bondom34 wrote:
Dn4sty wrote:
Andre Roberstan wrote:
I'm sorry, Kilpatrick and Powell are NOT Oladipo or Adams replacements. Kilpatrick's a decent player, but he's closer to Monta than Dipo.


I agree that Powell is a stretch. However I think Kilpatrick and Donovan Mitchell (draft pick) would likely give you almost the exact same production as Dipo and it would be WAY cheaper even after you re-sign Kilpatrick.

I'd vehemently disagree.


In this scenario you would still have Dipo. If it didn't work after year one, you could re-configure. Then you'd be out 2 second round picks and one giant tax bill.

The point of my post was to explore options for adding players to the roster than could in theory be cheaper (and hopefully almost as good or the same as) than Adams and Dipo.
User avatar
ThunderBolt
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,368
And1: 19,234
Joined: Dec 29, 2016
Location: Lynnwood, WA
   

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#45 » by ThunderBolt » Wed Apr 26, 2017 8:16 pm

Pillendreher wrote:
Read on Twitter


Hopefully it will pay off.

Read on Twitter


Let's hope we can work something out.


Keep Taj, move Vic. We need some veterans on the floor. Nick is great but he doesn't provide the leadership on the floor due to his age. Taj can do that. It all starts with Dre's contract. Once we kno what's happening with that, we can move forward. I think it's unlikely Taj is here next year but I hope I'm wrong.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
User avatar
spearsy23
RealGM
Posts: 19,481
And1: 7,654
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
   

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#46 » by spearsy23 » Thu Apr 27, 2017 1:08 am

Dn4sty wrote:
bondom34 wrote:
Dn4sty wrote:
I agree that Powell is a stretch. However I think Kilpatrick and Donovan Mitchell (draft pick) would likely give you almost the exact same production as Dipo and it would be WAY cheaper even after you re-sign Kilpatrick.

I'd vehemently disagree.


In this scenario you would still have Dipo. If it didn't work after year one, you could re-configure. Then you'd be out 2 second round picks and one giant tax bill.

The point of my post was to explore options for adding players to the roster than could in theory be cheaper (and hopefully almost as good or the same as) than Adams and Dipo.

Regardless, why would Brooklyn trade Kilpatrick for a pick they could buy and the privilege of being the team to cut semaj?
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
Dn4sty
Analyst
Posts: 3,477
And1: 1,929
Joined: Apr 11, 2017

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#47 » by Dn4sty » Thu Apr 27, 2017 1:30 am

spearsy23 wrote:
Dn4sty wrote:
bondom34 wrote:I'd vehemently disagree.


In this scenario you would still have Dipo. If it didn't work after year one, you could re-configure. Then you'd be out 2 second round picks and one giant tax bill.

The point of my post was to explore options for adding players to the roster than could in theory be cheaper (and hopefully almost as good or the same as) than Adams and Dipo.

Regardless, why would Brooklyn trade Kilpatrick for a pick they could buy and the privilege of being the team to cut semaj?


Lots of Net fans are saying they would
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#48 » by bondom34 » Thu Apr 27, 2017 2:22 am

spearsy23 wrote:
Dn4sty wrote:
bondom34 wrote:I'd vehemently disagree.


In this scenario you would still have Dipo. If it didn't work after year one, you could re-configure. Then you'd be out 2 second round picks and one giant tax bill.

The point of my post was to explore options for adding players to the roster than could in theory be cheaper (and hopefully almost as good or the same as) than Adams and Dipo.

Regardless, why would Brooklyn trade Kilpatrick for a pick they could buy and the privilege of being the team to cut semaj?

He's old and not that good. You can find better prospects with a second.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
User avatar
ThunderBolt
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,368
And1: 19,234
Joined: Dec 29, 2016
Location: Lynnwood, WA
   

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#49 » by ThunderBolt » Thu Apr 27, 2017 2:27 am

I will say this-part of the reason with my frustration with Oladipo and Adams is because they are thunder guys. I think most would admit that Presti has been far from perfect. One thing he's done well is to find guys that fit here and like it. In a world/league full of jerks, we've got some genuinely good dudes. In the past there have been a few malcontents, but most are happy. Especially on this team. I wish Kanter, Adams and Vic had the talent levels we want because I think their personalities fit perfect alongside Russ. No one wanted Vic to succeed more than me.

I'm sure we could have gotten cousins if we would have wanted. I'm not sure it would have helped in the locker room. We wonder why a roster that's so bad managed to meet and surpass our expectations. Russ was a huge part of it. Guys that love Russ are the part that no one talks about.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
User avatar
spearsy23
RealGM
Posts: 19,481
And1: 7,654
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
   

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#50 » by spearsy23 » Thu Apr 27, 2017 2:27 am

bondom34 wrote:
spearsy23 wrote:
Dn4sty wrote:
In this scenario you would still have Dipo. If it didn't work after year one, you could re-configure. Then you'd be out 2 second round picks and one giant tax bill.

The point of my post was to explore options for adding players to the roster than could in theory be cheaper (and hopefully almost as good or the same as) than Adams and Dipo.

Regardless, why would Brooklyn trade Kilpatrick for a pick they could buy and the privilege of being the team to cut semaj?

He's old and not that good. You can find better prospects with a second.

How many second round guys each year ever put up 13/4/2 on solid efficiency? Maybe one or two? How many of them are drafted with pick 50 or later?
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#51 » by bondom34 » Thu Apr 27, 2017 2:34 am

spearsy23 wrote:
bondom34 wrote:
spearsy23 wrote:Regardless, why would Brooklyn trade Kilpatrick for a pick they could buy and the privilege of being the team to cut semaj?

He's old and not that good. You can find better prospects with a second.

How many second round guys each year ever put up 13/4/2 on solid efficiency? Maybe one or two? How many of them are drafted with pick 50 or later?

Just the last 4 drafts, after pick 45 I'd take Norm Powell, Felder, Dwight Powell, Clarkson,Neto and James Ennis
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
User avatar
spearsy23
RealGM
Posts: 19,481
And1: 7,654
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
   

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#52 » by spearsy23 » Thu Apr 27, 2017 2:47 am

bondom34 wrote:
spearsy23 wrote:
bondom34 wrote:He's old and not that good. You can find better prospects with a second.

How many second round guys each year ever put up 13/4/2 on solid efficiency? Maybe one or two? How many of them are drafted with pick 50 or later?

Just the last 4 drafts, after pick 45 I'd take Norm Powell, Felder, Dwight Powell, Clarkson,Neto and James Ennis

Jordan Clarkson is the only one of those guys to have ever averaged 10 or more points per game. I'd take Norman Powell over Kilpatrick, but the rest of them really aren't even close to better.
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
User avatar
Thabo Sefolosha
Thunder Forum The Opening Tip
Posts: 3,427
And1: 6,667
Joined: Oct 29, 2013
 

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#53 » by Thabo Sefolosha » Thu Apr 27, 2017 2:47 am

Late but:
Image
Image
User avatar
spearsy23
RealGM
Posts: 19,481
And1: 7,654
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
   

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#54 » by spearsy23 » Thu Apr 27, 2017 3:18 am

I just looked at the per 36 numbers and Kilpatrick averaged more points, rebounds, and assists than oladipo on better efficiency with only a 2% higher usage... 22 million vs 1 million.
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
User avatar
ThunderBolt
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,368
And1: 19,234
Joined: Dec 29, 2016
Location: Lynnwood, WA
   

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#55 » by ThunderBolt » Thu Apr 27, 2017 3:22 am

spearsy23 wrote:I just looked at the per 36 numbers and Kilpatrick averaged more points, rebounds, and assists than oladipo on better efficiency with only a 2% higher usage... 22 million vs 1 million.


Wow. Why are the nets wanting to move him?
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
User avatar
spearsy23
RealGM
Posts: 19,481
And1: 7,654
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
   

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#56 » by spearsy23 » Thu Apr 27, 2017 3:25 am

Knrstz wrote:
spearsy23 wrote:I just looked at the per 36 numbers and Kilpatrick averaged more points, rebounds, and assists than oladipo on better efficiency with only a 2% higher usage... 22 million vs 1 million.


Wow. Why are the nets wanting to move him?

Because he's already 27 and they don't want to pay him when they're starting their rebuild. Also, he's not anything special as a player, it just more illustrates that oladipo isn't either.
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#57 » by bondom34 » Thu Apr 27, 2017 4:10 am

spearsy23 wrote:I just looked at the per 36 numbers and Kilpatrick averaged more points, rebounds, and assists than oladipo on better efficiency with only a 2% higher usage... 22 million vs 1 million.

Not saying it's the be all end all, but RPM:
Dipo: 7th SG
Kilpatrick: 74th
If they want someone for nothing, just get Belli from Charlotte.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
User avatar
getrichordie
General Manager
Posts: 9,425
And1: 2,313
Joined: Oct 22, 2015
 

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#58 » by getrichordie » Thu Apr 27, 2017 4:24 am

Signings:

PG: Shaun Livingston
SG: J.J. Reddick (if we cannot get Livingston, we moved Oladipo to PG and have Reddick take the 2)
PF: James Johnson

That's what I'm realistically hoping for.

Westbrook/Livingston/Oladipo
Oladipo/Livingston/Abrines
Roberson/McDermott
Gibson/Johnson
Adams/Kanter
[twitter] @thunderdustin
User avatar
spearsy23
RealGM
Posts: 19,481
And1: 7,654
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
   

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#59 » by spearsy23 » Thu Apr 27, 2017 4:36 am

bondom34 wrote:
spearsy23 wrote:I just looked at the per 36 numbers and Kilpatrick averaged more points, rebounds, and assists than oladipo on better efficiency with only a 2% higher usage... 22 million vs 1 million.

Not saying it's the be all end all, but RPM:
Dipo: 7th SG
Kilpatrick: 74th
If they want someone for nothing, just get Belli from Charlotte.

I'm going to keep saying it until I'm blue in the face: RPM was never intended to be used in this way. It purely estimates expected player value going forward in a player's current role with a similar team and style. There are obvious reasons oladipo is in a better position to succeed (namely Russ and Robes).

That's not to say Kilpatrick is obviously better than oladipo though, I'm just saying that there are a plethora of guys that could give you similar production to oladipo for much cheaper than the 20+ million he's going to make. I believe the only way we'll ever be successful long term is by subscribing to a moneyball style philosophy, we HAVE to find players that are undervalued (either due to oversight or due to the rookie scale) and only spend big money on true difference makers. Right now we're doing exactly the opposite and relying on guys that are overvalued relative to on court production.

45 million dollars is getting us a combined average of 27.2/12/3.7. So basically next year we're getting demarcus cousins value and paying an extra 20 million for it. And that's without touching Kanter's contract.
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
User avatar
spearsy23
RealGM
Posts: 19,481
And1: 7,654
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
   

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2017: The Reshapening 

Post#60 » by spearsy23 » Thu Apr 27, 2017 4:38 am

getrichordie wrote:Signings:

PG: Shaun Livingston
SG: J.J. Reddick (if we cannot get Livingston, we moved Oladipo to PG and have Reddick take the 2)
PF: James Johnson

That's what I'm realistically hoping for.

Westbrook/Livingston/Oladipo
Oladipo/Livingston/Abrines
Roberson/McDermott
Gibson/Johnson
Adams/Kanter

In order to sign Redick alone you have to move at least 2 of Adams/vic/enes
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.

Return to Oklahoma City Thunder