hardenASG13 wrote:Would you admit that Robersons impact was comically overstated if it does? From what I've seen, the defense is fine (great actually) without him, due to not regularly playing guys that would otherwise be out of the league in his place.
the defense was a lot better last season in games where andre roberson played. no, his impact is not 'comically overstated', and is well supported by objective evidence over many seasons. that the thunder have been able to scrape together an effective defense to this point without him is a credit to the thunder though, as it's something they have not been able to do for years.
hardenASG13 wrote:The offense is much more watchable/effective, although in addition to not having Roberson in there for 30mpg, improved play from adams and grant, as well as how amazing Schroeder has been have certainly played a role.
no, this isn't true. the offense is not more effective. schroder really hasn't been that good either. why are we even talking about this?
Kizz Fastfists wrote:Donovan is garbage! He says the team is getting the shots he wants, but at 31.4% from 3 while shooting 51.7% on 2pt shots even a first grader can do the math to know they need to take less 3s. Donovan wants a team that can't shoot to take their most inefficient shots. Fire the idiot and bring in someone that understands scoring matters. OKC is averaging 102.2 ppg against teams in the top 15 in defensive efficiency. They won't win many games against decent defenses because as good as OKC's defense is they won't be able to score enough and will lose a bunch of low scoring games when they get to the part of the schedule where they play real teams regularly. Five of OKC's wins are against the 3 worst teams in the NBA.
i think you're losing your mind. my only comment is on donovan, the defense, and the double standard. double standards are the worst. donovan deserves credit for the team playing will if he is going to be unilaterally blamed for the team playing poorly.
i don't believe the thunder are a great team. i think the defense is playing over their heads and the offense will struggle against better competition.
spearsy23 wrote:Going to admit Beyer is a genius?
what has been attributed to him, exactly? the scapegoaters attribute virtually all of the thunder problems to donovan when the team loses. it's only fair that he's credited when the team wins, if you're going to attribute losses to him for no reason other than 'he's the head coach and he's responsible'. yes, that's literally the justification the scapegoaters use here when the thunder lose a few games.
donovan's not a great coach it's just funny how selective some people are with assigning credit and blame.