How good is Nick Collison, exactly?
Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2011 10:39 pm
I like Collison a lot. I think he's a good player (very underrated). But I don't know HOW good he is.
The box score metrics say he's nothing special. PER is 10.0 this year (but 14.0 on his career, his rebound and USG rates plumetted this year).
However, 2 year adjusted +/- has him as the sixth best player in the ENTIRE NBA. LeBron, Durant, Nash, Wade and Dirk are the only players with better 2 year adjusted +/- numbers than Nick Collison.
Now obviously, calling him the 6th best player in the NBA is more than a little absurd, and I'm sure his +/- numbers are slightly inflated by the weakness of some of our other interior defenders, but it does make me wonder.
How exactly do you measure the worth of a player whose main value does not show up in the box score, nor is immediately obvious to the casual observer?
The box score metrics say he's nothing special. PER is 10.0 this year (but 14.0 on his career, his rebound and USG rates plumetted this year).
However, 2 year adjusted +/- has him as the sixth best player in the ENTIRE NBA. LeBron, Durant, Nash, Wade and Dirk are the only players with better 2 year adjusted +/- numbers than Nick Collison.
Now obviously, calling him the 6th best player in the NBA is more than a little absurd, and I'm sure his +/- numbers are slightly inflated by the weakness of some of our other interior defenders, but it does make me wonder.
How exactly do you measure the worth of a player whose main value does not show up in the box score, nor is immediately obvious to the casual observer?