When discussing the Thunders future why have any mention of
Posted: Sat May 11, 2013 6:11 pm
I'm not a OK fan,I'm 110% with the raptors so my following of the Thunder is ,more on a casual basis, but with the recent discussions on the impact of the Harden trade, the thunders future, why have any meant ion of perry Jones 3 and Jeremy lamb just appear when talking about the future of this team?
I'm blown away that a team that already has a contender core establish , that's most dire need is depth( and a replacement for Perkins) has two(soon to be three with the raptors pick) just waiting in the wings,devopling, is not discussed at all. Does any other contending team besides possibly then the warriors ( and putting them as contending may be abit much at the moment) have such a solid future ahead? A established core, with a ton of young talent just waiting to be productive for this team?
Although I can see my raptors in the second round next year, its hard not to be envious of the Thunder.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using RealGM Forums mobile app
I'm blown away that a team that already has a contender core establish , that's most dire need is depth( and a replacement for Perkins) has two(soon to be three with the raptors pick) just waiting in the wings,devopling, is not discussed at all. Does any other contending team besides possibly then the warriors ( and putting them as contending may be abit much at the moment) have such a solid future ahead? A established core, with a ton of young talent just waiting to be productive for this team?
Although I can see my raptors in the second round next year, its hard not to be envious of the Thunder.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using RealGM Forums mobile app