Page 1 of 1
PG: Sacramento Kings (94) - Oklahoma City Thunder (110)
Posted: Sat Mar 18, 2017 9:24 pm
by Thabo Sefolosha
Re: PG: Sacramento Kings (94) - Oklahoma City Thunder (110)
Posted: Sat Mar 18, 2017 9:27 pm
by Fabio19
McBuckets looked gooood
Re: PG: Sacramento Kings (94) - Oklahoma City Thunder (110)
Posted: Sat Mar 18, 2017 9:39 pm
by ThunderBolt
Even when Vic is having an off shooting night, I wish he could still find a way to get a few more points rather than disappearing. On the flip side I'm happy to see others step up.
Re: PG: Sacramento Kings (94) - Oklahoma City Thunder (110)
Posted: Sat Mar 18, 2017 9:46 pm
by DoubleJ13
I'm blaming the early start for Dipo & Taj having off nights. Adams & Doug filled in nicely though.
Also shout out to Semaj, he had a block & a runner so that's nice.
Re: PG: Sacramento Kings (94) - Oklahoma City Thunder (110)
Posted: Sat Mar 18, 2017 10:46 pm
by oken
I did not vote for Russ because of no triple-double. That's an automatic no vote for me. I am THAT pampered.
Re: PG: Sacramento Kings (94) - Oklahoma City Thunder (110)
Posted: Sat Mar 18, 2017 11:01 pm
by spearsy23
Get (Mc)Buckets yo.
Re: PG: Sacramento Kings (94) - Oklahoma City Thunder (110)
Posted: Sat Mar 18, 2017 11:05 pm
by NetsWorld
Much improved team after the trade deadline. And the playoff standings speaks for itself. We jumped from a # 7 to a #5 seed. I think maybe the team needed a little time before finally adjusting to life without KD. I said before the trade the personnel in place was only there because KD was here last year and Presti had to make a few moves and he did and it payed off nicely.
Re: PG: Sacramento Kings (94) - Oklahoma City Thunder (110)
Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2017 12:11 am
by City of Trees
Your team looks a lot better defensively.
What did you guys think of Papagiannis? This was the first game he got major run.
Sent from my SM-J700T using
RealGM mobile app
Re: PG: Sacramento Kings (94) - Oklahoma City Thunder (110)
Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2017 12:34 am
by ThunderBolt
City of Trees wrote:Your team looks a lot better defensively.
What did you guys think of Papagiannis? This was the first game he got major run.
Sent from my SM-J700T using
RealGM mobile app
I only saw the second half but he had some nice moves.
Re: PG: Sacramento Kings (94) - Oklahoma City Thunder (110)
Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2017 12:47 am
by Bergmaniac
Knrstz wrote:Even when Vic is having an off shooting night, I wish he could still find a way to get a few more points rather than disappearing.
He is just really bad at drawing fouls, especially for a guy with his athleticism. He's already had 17 games this season where he's shot no FTs. In most of these he shot 14+ FGA.
Anyway, this was a typical early tip-off game, too sloppy and lethargic at times.
Re: PG: Sacramento Kings (94) - Oklahoma City Thunder (110)
Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2017 12:57 am
by bondom34
Good win. 5 seed still has a chance, just need LAC to slip a little more if possible.
Re: PG: Sacramento Kings (94) - Oklahoma City Thunder (110)
Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2017 3:26 pm
by Rhinou
bondom34 wrote:Good win. 5 seed still has a chance, just need LAC to slip a little more if possible.
Only 2 games back in the loss column from the Jazz for the 4th seed. And OKC has the tie breaker.