Patrick Patterson..the next Kyle Singler

Moderators: Dadouv47, retrobro90

sleestak33
Junior
Posts: 388
And1: 150
Joined: Mar 17, 2017
   

Patrick Patterson..the next Kyle Singler 

Post#1 » by sleestak33 » Mon Dec 4, 2017 1:23 pm

When Singler came to OKC he seemed like a good acquisition and had he continued to progress he would have fit in very nicely with the Thunder but somehow his game went completely to crap and now would be out of the NBA if not for Presti's 25 million dollar contract. I know it's a bit early but now we have another guy who looks almost exactly the same in Patterson and frankly it looks much worse and I haven't seen any indication in any of the games he's played that his play is going to change. He's averaging 2 points and 1 rebound and shooting only 31% on 3s and frankly that's all he does...just float around the 3 point line and jack them up. They were actually talking about starting him before they got Carmelo. I can't even fathom what this team would look like starting him AND Roberson. They would easily have lost 5-6 more games with that lineup. It's been 22 games so the "he's just rusty" excuses are over now.
CROklahoma
Junior
Posts: 451
And1: 130
Joined: Feb 22, 2017

Re: Patrick Patterson..the next Kyle Singler 

Post#2 » by CROklahoma » Mon Dec 4, 2017 1:33 pm

It's on a coach to try and put him into a role within a team.

You can't have a role when some of the guys get away with 27%+ usage rate, without being willing to distribute and let someone else do the decisions with the ball ...
User avatar
Pillendreher
RealGM
Posts: 14,191
And1: 9,953
Joined: Jan 25, 2015
 

Re: Patrick Patterson..the next Kyle Singler 

Post#3 » by Pillendreher » Mon Dec 4, 2017 1:45 pm

Contrary to Singler, Patterson was an excellent Role Player before coming here. It's more like Patterson is the new Taj Gibson and Abrines is the new Anthony Morrow.
"I don't know of any player that, when the shot goes up, he doesn't want it to go in," Donovan said
slick_watts
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,541
And1: 6,787
Joined: Jan 03, 2005
Location: Miami, FL

Re: Patrick Patterson..the next Kyle Singler 

Post#4 » by slick_watts » Mon Dec 4, 2017 3:45 pm

those certainly are some words.
User avatar
dakomish23
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 58,759
And1: 48,729
Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Location: Empire State
     

Re: Patrick Patterson..the next Kyle Singler 

Post#5 » by dakomish23 » Mon Dec 4, 2017 4:02 pm

He’s still solid defensively, especially in space.

His offense has been extremely awful. Shooting 32/31 after shooting 45/37 the last 5 seasons.

In theory him and Grant should compliment each other.
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor


#FreeJimmit
jambalaya
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,674
And1: 288
Joined: Feb 01, 2005

Re: Patrick Patterson..the next Kyle Singler 

Post#6 » by jambalaya » Mon Dec 4, 2017 4:33 pm

Career worst marks in almost everything except steals and making long 2s.
User avatar
Pillendreher
RealGM
Posts: 14,191
And1: 9,953
Joined: Jan 25, 2015
 

Re: Patrick Patterson..the next Kyle Singler 

Post#7 » by Pillendreher » Mon Dec 4, 2017 4:43 pm

dakomish23 wrote:He’s still solid defensively, especially in space.

His offense has been extremely awful. Shooting 32/31 after shooting 45/37 the last 5 seasons.

In theory him and Grant should compliment each other.


Well to be fair we are not using him at all offensively. He's getting his 2 C&S 3PA per game that are happy accidents and not the result of executing a play.
He has gotten 2 total FGA at the rim so far. Not per game, total.

We're not giving him the ball to make plays. We're not giving him high % shots. The only thing we're letting him do is shoot out of rhythm 3s.

We're wasting him.

EDIT:

Synergy stats have him at a total of 9 poss. as the PnR Rollman.
"I don't know of any player that, when the shot goes up, he doesn't want it to go in," Donovan said
User avatar
dakomish23
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 58,759
And1: 48,729
Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Location: Empire State
     

Re: Patrick Patterson..the next Kyle Singler 

Post#8 » by dakomish23 » Mon Dec 4, 2017 4:58 pm

Pillendreher wrote:
dakomish23 wrote:He’s still solid defensively, especially in space.

His offense has been extremely awful. Shooting 32/31 after shooting 45/37 the last 5 seasons.

In theory him and Grant should compliment each other.


Well to be fair we are not using him at all offensively. He's getting his 2 C&S 3PA per game that are happy accidents and not the result of executing a play.
He has gotten 2 total FGA at the rim so far. Not per game, total.

We're not giving him the ball to make plays. We're not giving him high % shots. The only thing we're letting him do is shoot out of rhythm 3s.

We're wasting him.

EDIT:

Synergy stats have him at a total of 9 poss. as the PnR Rollman.


Were many plays run for him in TOR?
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor


#FreeJimmit
User avatar
Pillendreher
RealGM
Posts: 14,191
And1: 9,953
Joined: Jan 25, 2015
 

Re: Patrick Patterson..the next Kyle Singler 

Post#9 » by Pillendreher » Mon Dec 4, 2017 5:20 pm

dakomish23 wrote:
Pillendreher wrote:
dakomish23 wrote:He’s still solid defensively, especially in space.

His offense has been extremely awful. Shooting 32/31 after shooting 45/37 the last 5 seasons.

In theory him and Grant should compliment each other.


Well to be fair we are not using him at all offensively. He's getting his 2 C&S 3PA per game that are happy accidents and not the result of executing a play.
He has gotten 2 total FGA at the rim so far. Not per game, total.

We're not giving him the ball to make plays. We're not giving him high % shots. The only thing we're letting him do is shoot out of rhythm 3s.

We're wasting him.

EDIT:

Synergy stats have him at a total of 9 poss. as the PnR Rollman.


Were many plays run for him in TOR?


Gotta ask Toronto fans. I don't mean running plays specifically for him. I'm talking about using him in more ways than just cleanup duty. Defensively, we're asking him to cover for other people's mistakes. Offensively, we're asking him to bail us out when we can't find offense.
He's not included in anything offensively. Sure, he's setting a screen here and there, but it's not like we're treating him as somebody who's supposed to contribute.
"I don't know of any player that, when the shot goes up, he doesn't want it to go in," Donovan said
Andre Roberstan
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 10,521
And1: 6,859
Joined: Jun 23, 2015
Contact:
   

Re: Patrick Patterson..the next Kyle Singler 

Post#10 » by Andre Roberstan » Mon Dec 4, 2017 5:23 pm

We halved his minutes and his FGA. Why is it a surprise that he's shooting badly when there's no way he'll ever get into a rhythm?

Either he or Grant needs to be moved, because Melo coming to OKC means not enough minutes at F to go round.
Image
User avatar
Pillendreher
RealGM
Posts: 14,191
And1: 9,953
Joined: Jan 25, 2015
 

Re: Patrick Patterson..the next Kyle Singler 

Post#11 » by Pillendreher » Mon Dec 4, 2017 5:27 pm

Andre Roberstan wrote:We halved his minutes and his FGA. Why is it a surprise that he's shooting badly when there's no way he'll ever get into a rhythm?

Either he or Grant needs to be moved, because Melo coming to OKC means not enough minutes at F to go round.


He should slide down to the 4 next to an athletic shotblocker. That's the move we need to make.
"I don't know of any player that, when the shot goes up, he doesn't want it to go in," Donovan said
jambalaya
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,674
And1: 288
Joined: Feb 01, 2005

Re: Patrick Patterson..the next Kyle Singler 

Post#12 » by jambalaya » Mon Dec 4, 2017 6:39 pm

Halved minutes, shots cut by almost 2/3rds. Per 100 possessions, shots down 25%.
User avatar
getrichordie
General Manager
Posts: 9,425
And1: 2,313
Joined: Oct 22, 2015
 

Re: Patrick Patterson..the next Kyle Singler 

Post#13 » by getrichordie » Tue Dec 5, 2017 1:09 am

Andre Roberstan wrote:We halved his minutes and his FGA. Why is it a surprise that he's shooting badly when there's no way he'll ever get into a rhythm?

Either he or Grant needs to be moved because Melo coming to OKC means not enough minutes at F to go round.


Yeah, I've been saying this for a while. Who do you keep and why? I mean, Grant has been solid defensively and definitely helps back-up Adams moreso than Patterson. I think a lot of that decision is going to hinge on whether Presti thinks he can keep Grant and move Patterson for a backup 5 which seems unlikely. What's the max amount of dollars we can throw at Grant (assuming both George extends and Anthony picks up his option)?
[twitter] @thunderdustin
jambalaya
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,674
And1: 288
Joined: Feb 01, 2005

Re: Patrick Patterson..the next Kyle Singler 

Post#14 » by jambalaya » Tue Dec 5, 2017 2:48 am

There is no fixed max amount. It depends on willingness to pay and probably paying massive additional tax. It depends on how massive the roster changes they make. It depends on how much somebody else offers. There is probably going to be too many decent or better free agents chasing too few or way too few dollars.
User avatar
Pillendreher
RealGM
Posts: 14,191
And1: 9,953
Joined: Jan 25, 2015
 

Re: Patrick Patterson..the next Kyle Singler 

Post#15 » by Pillendreher » Tue Dec 5, 2017 9:47 am

getrichordie wrote:
Andre Roberstan wrote:We halved his minutes and his FGA. Why is it a surprise that he's shooting badly when there's no way he'll ever get into a rhythm?

Either he or Grant needs to be moved because Melo coming to OKC means not enough minutes at F to go round.


Yeah, I've been saying this for a while. Who do you keep and why? I mean, Grant has been solid defensively and definitely helps back-up Adams moreso than Patterson. I think a lot of that decision is going to hinge on whether Presti thinks he can keep Grant and move Patterson for a backup 5 which seems unlikely. What's the max amount of dollars we can throw at Grant (assuming both George extends and Anthony picks up his option)?


Patterson is a good player on a great deal. Grant is a below average player who will get a bigger deal next summer because he is athletic.

It's not even a debate who you keep.
"I don't know of any player that, when the shot goes up, he doesn't want it to go in," Donovan said
User avatar
ThunderBolt
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,340
And1: 19,166
Joined: Dec 29, 2016
Location: Lynnwood, WA
   

Re: Patrick Patterson..the next Kyle Singler 

Post#16 » by ThunderBolt » Tue Dec 5, 2017 12:56 pm

Pillendreher wrote:
getrichordie wrote:
Andre Roberstan wrote:We halved his minutes and his FGA. Why is it a surprise that he's shooting badly when there's no way he'll ever get into a rhythm?

Either he or Grant needs to be moved because Melo coming to OKC means not enough minutes at F to go round.


Yeah, I've been saying this for a while. Who do you keep and why? I mean, Grant has been solid defensively and definitely helps back-up Adams moreso than Patterson. I think a lot of that decision is going to hinge on whether Presti thinks he can keep Grant and move Patterson for a backup 5 which seems unlikely. What's the max amount of dollars we can throw at Grant (assuming both George extends and Anthony picks up his option)?


Patterson is a good player on a great deal. Grant is a below average player who will get a bigger deal next summer because he is athletic.

It's not even a debate who you keep.


Assuming we are looking to make a trade now, I agree. If at the end of the year Patterson hasn’t improved, and grant can be had at a reasonable price, then I’m all for keeping the guy who has made some progress.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
User avatar
Pillendreher
RealGM
Posts: 14,191
And1: 9,953
Joined: Jan 25, 2015
 

Re: Patrick Patterson..the next Kyle Singler 

Post#17 » by Pillendreher » Tue Dec 5, 2017 1:25 pm

Knrstz wrote:
Pillendreher wrote:
getrichordie wrote:
Yeah, I've been saying this for a while. Who do you keep and why? I mean, Grant has been solid defensively and definitely helps back-up Adams moreso than Patterson. I think a lot of that decision is going to hinge on whether Presti thinks he can keep Grant and move Patterson for a backup 5 which seems unlikely. What's the max amount of dollars we can throw at Grant (assuming both George extends and Anthony picks up his option)?


Patterson is a good player on a great deal. Grant is a below average player who will get a bigger deal next summer because he is athletic.

It's not even a debate who you keep.


Assuming we are looking to make a trade now, I agree. If at the end of the year Patterson hasn’t improved, and grant can be had at a reasonable price, then I’m all for keeping the guy who has made some progress.


I disagree. Patterson is an excellent glue gluy for our starters. It's up to Donovan to actually use him in that fashion and stop acting like Russ-George-Adams-Grant needs to be our 4th most played Russ-George-Adams-x lineup and finally give Patterson the minutes he deserves. We can't blame Patterson for the fact that Donovan is a moron when it comes to maximizing roleplayers. Not even 10 % of Patterson's minutes have been with Russ-George-Adams. That's insane. Josh Huestis has played the exact amount of minutes with those guys as Patterson. And Huestis has been in and out of the rotation all season long.

Grant needs to be dealt, period. He has been better at finishing at the rim, but that is not what this team needs to get his best players going.
"I don't know of any player that, when the shot goes up, he doesn't want it to go in," Donovan said
User avatar
Reign23
RealGM
Posts: 11,677
And1: 12,442
Joined: Dec 29, 2014
Location: Germany.
   

Re: Patrick Patterson..the next Kyle Singler 

Post#18 » by Reign23 » Tue Dec 5, 2017 1:25 pm

patterson sure looks terrible so far..
formerly known as knickst4pe
User avatar
ThunderBolt
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,340
And1: 19,166
Joined: Dec 29, 2016
Location: Lynnwood, WA
   

Re: Patrick Patterson..the next Kyle Singler 

Post#19 » by ThunderBolt » Tue Dec 5, 2017 2:22 pm

Pillendreher wrote:
Knrstz wrote:
Pillendreher wrote:
Patterson is a good player on a great deal. Grant is a below average player who will get a bigger deal next summer because he is athletic.

It's not even a debate who you keep.


Assuming we are looking to make a trade now, I agree. If at the end of the year Patterson hasn’t improved, and grant can be had at a reasonable price, then I’m all for keeping the guy who has made some progress.


I disagree. Patterson is an excellent glue gluy for our starters. It's up to Donovan to actually use him in that fashion and stop acting like Russ-George-Adams-Grant needs to be our 4th most played Russ-George-Adams-x lineup and finally give Patterson the minutes he deserves. We can't blame Patterson for the fact that Donovan is a moron when it comes to maximizing roleplayers. Not even 10 % of Patterson's minutes have been with Russ-George-Adams. That's insane. Josh Huestis has played the exact amount of minutes with those guys as Patterson. And Huestis has been in and out of the rotation all season long.

Grant needs to be dealt, period. He has been better at finishing at the rim, but that is not what this team needs to get his best players going.

I’m all for giving Patterson every opportunity to succeed but I don’t see how his performance can be entirely blamed on lineups. He just hasn’t been very good at anything so far. Dononvan needs to quit using the knee as an excuse for rusty play. Give him minutes to shake off the rust or rest him if he’s not healthy.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
User avatar
Pillendreher
RealGM
Posts: 14,191
And1: 9,953
Joined: Jan 25, 2015
 

Re: Patrick Patterson..the next Kyle Singler 

Post#20 » by Pillendreher » Tue Dec 5, 2017 2:35 pm

Knrstz wrote:
Pillendreher wrote:
Knrstz wrote:
Assuming we are looking to make a trade now, I agree. If at the end of the year Patterson hasn’t improved, and grant can be had at a reasonable price, then I’m all for keeping the guy who has made some progress.


I disagree. Patterson is an excellent glue gluy for our starters. It's up to Donovan to actually use him in that fashion and stop acting like Russ-George-Adams-Grant needs to be our 4th most played Russ-George-Adams-x lineup and finally give Patterson the minutes he deserves. We can't blame Patterson for the fact that Donovan is a moron when it comes to maximizing roleplayers. Not even 10 % of Patterson's minutes have been with Russ-George-Adams. That's insane. Josh Huestis has played the exact amount of minutes with those guys as Patterson. And Huestis has been in and out of the rotation all season long.

Grant needs to be dealt, period. He has been better at finishing at the rim, but that is not what this team needs to get his best players going.

I’m all for giving Patterson every opportunity to succeed but I don’t see how his performance can be entirely blamed on lineups. He just hasn’t been very good at anything so far. Dononvan needs to quit using the knee as an excuse for rusty play. Give him minutes to shake off the rust or rest him if he’s not healthy.


I'm not disagreeing with that. He has not played well (at all) so far. It's not just on Donovan, but on him as well. But the way we've been using him, he's not gonna succeed.

Just look at this:

These are the guys who have played at least 100 minutes so far, average 15 or less than 15 minutes per game and have a USG% of 10 or below 10 %:

http://bkref.com/tiny/udGRq

That list consists of Patterson, a rookie (Semi), Eric Moreland (who?) and broken down and/or old guys(Calderon, Dudley, Bogut, Terry, Udoh).
Is this really the role we want to give him? We're treating him like he's Nick Collison right now.

I'm sorry, but Patterson is terribly misused. I'd even understand if Donovan does not want to give him that big a role with the starters so the 'Bench Carmelo' talk doesn't start, but at some point, he'll have to do what's good for the team and stop with this nonsense. A guy with a +2 RPM two years in a row should not be treated like he's some 40 yo scrub riding into the sunset.
"I don't know of any player that, when the shot goes up, he doesn't want it to go in," Donovan said

Return to Oklahoma City Thunder