Maybe last year's team didn't "overachieve"...they were just better
Moderators: Dadouv47, retrobro90
Maybe last year's team didn't "overachieve"...they were just better
-
- Junior
- Posts: 388
- And1: 150
- Joined: Mar 17, 2017
-
Maybe last year's team didn't "overachieve"...they were just better
After 31 games OKC is 16-15 and have struggled massively to find any kind of a groove and they still look discombobulated. Last year at the same time they were 19-12 and Russ was having his monster season. After seeing what PG and Carmelo are doing now that they're here and also seeing what Oladipo (who has exploded), Sabonis, Kanter (doing what he's always done AND STARTING) and McDermott are doing it looks like we actually got the worst end of the two trades. I was on board with the trades (although I thought they shouldn't have gotten Carmelo...Kanter was too important) and I thought they would be right up there with Houston and the Warriors but it's turning out that the big3 are all too similar in their style of play and it's just not working. Maybe in 31 more games things will look different but as of right now there's no question if they had left the team just like it was OKC would have been much better off.
Re: Maybe last year's team didn't "overachieve"...they were just better
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 16,540
- And1: 6,786
- Joined: Jan 03, 2005
- Location: Miami, FL
Re: Maybe last year's team didn't "overachieve"...they were just better
1) your expectation that the team would be right up there with houston and the warriors was foolish.
2) the team is a bit better than last year despite the worse record.
3) the biggest problem with the team so far is westbrook playing bad, not the trade imbalance.
2) the team is a bit better than last year despite the worse record.
3) the biggest problem with the team so far is westbrook playing bad, not the trade imbalance.
Re: Maybe last year's team didn't "overachieve"...they were just better
- oken
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 826
- And1: 429
- Joined: Jun 24, 2016
-
Re: Maybe last year's team didn't "overachieve"...they were just better
I was happy for both of the trades but not for the OKC part, I was happy for the players as they would finally be able to show their potential under a better coach and a system that had something more than "get Russel the ball".
Maybe it is time to realize that the reason why this is not going to work is the submissive, player-pampering culture that has seeped into the veins of OKC Thunder for some time now.
Maybe it is time to realize that the reason why this is not going to work is the submissive, player-pampering culture that has seeped into the veins of OKC Thunder for some time now.
Re: Maybe last year's team didn't "overachieve"...they were just better
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,301
- And1: 2,234
- Joined: Jul 08, 2015
Re: Maybe last year's team didn't "overachieve"...they were just better
Last years "team" was terrible. Russell was the team. We had Semaj Christon getting valuable minutes off the bench.... We would have been lucky to win 30 games if 'Brook didn't go all time mode.
Re: Maybe last year's team didn't "overachieve"...they were just better
- ThunderBolt
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 19,340
- And1: 19,166
- Joined: Dec 29, 2016
- Location: Lynnwood, WA
-
Re: Maybe last year's team didn't "overachieve"...they were just better
Thundershock88 wrote:Last years "team" was terrible. Russell was the team. We had Semaj Christon getting valuable minutes off the bench.... We would have been lucky to win 30 games if 'Brook didn't go all time mode.
I think you could argue that last years team was better at every position except backup pg and small forward.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
Re: Maybe last year's team didn't "overachieve"...they were just better
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,301
- And1: 2,234
- Joined: Jul 08, 2015
Re: Maybe last year's team didn't "overachieve"...they were just better
Knrstz wrote:Thundershock88 wrote:Last years "team" was terrible. Russell was the team. We had Semaj Christon getting valuable minutes off the bench.... We would have been lucky to win 30 games if 'Brook didn't go all time mode.
I think you could argue that last years team was better at every position except backup pg and small forward.
And that would be revisionist history. How quickly you guys forget. Look, this team is underachieving in the win column, but in no way, shape, or form are they are a worse roster than last year.
Re: Maybe last year's team didn't "overachieve"...they were just better
-
- Ballboy
- Posts: 38
- And1: 25
- Joined: Feb 26, 2015
-
Re: Maybe last year's team didn't "overachieve"...they were just better
Thundershock88 wrote:Last years "team" was terrible. Russell was the team. We had Semaj Christon getting valuable minutes off the bench.... We would have been lucky to win 30 games if 'Brook didn't go all time mode.
Let’s get serious about last year’s team - it was all about Westbrook’s MVP chase, the team was him plus four guys on the court either boxing out other players or catching rebounds to give back to Russ to shoot again. They also had to make sure they scored off his passes, team concepts came secondary to all that.
Re: Maybe last year's team didn't "overachieve"...they were just better
- ThunderBolt
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 19,340
- And1: 19,166
- Joined: Dec 29, 2016
- Location: Lynnwood, WA
-
Re: Maybe last year's team didn't "overachieve"...they were just better
Thundershock88 wrote:Knrstz wrote:Thundershock88 wrote:Last years "team" was terrible. Russell was the team. We had Semaj Christon getting valuable minutes off the bench.... We would have been lucky to win 30 games if 'Brook didn't go all time mode.
I think you could argue that last years team was better at every position except backup pg and small forward.
And that would be revisionist history. How quickly you guys forget. Look, this team is underachieving in the win column, but in no way, shape, or form are they are a worse roster than last year.
Maybe not every position but last years russ was better than this years russ. Taj was better than Melo and Patterson. Enes was a better backup center than Dakari. Steven and Jerami are better than last year but our depth has taken a hit that we haven’t easily replaced.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
Re: Maybe last year's team didn't "overachieve"...they were just better
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,301
- And1: 2,234
- Joined: Jul 08, 2015
Re: Maybe last year's team didn't "overachieve"...they were just better
Knrstz wrote:Thundershock88 wrote:Knrstz wrote:
I think you could argue that last years team was better at every position except backup pg and small forward.
And that would be revisionist history. How quickly you guys forget. Look, this team is underachieving in the win column, but in no way, shape, or form are they are a worse roster than last year.
Maybe not every position but last years russ was better than this years russ. Taj was better than Melo and Patterson. Enes was a better backup center than Dakari. Steven and Jerami are better than last year but our depth has taken a hit that we haven’t easily replaced.
I think a lot of that is chemistry. Patterson seems to finally be coming into his normal form, and Melo was the main guy on his team. He's having to adjust. Taj knew his role and he did it well.
Re: Maybe last year's team didn't "overachieve"...they were just better
- bondom34
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 66,716
- And1: 50,290
- Joined: Mar 01, 2013
Re: Maybe last year's team didn't "overachieve"...they were just better
Oh ffs really people turning on Russ lol. Last years team was better at pf and backup big for sure. Starting 2 as well. But the season being only about him is whatever makes you feel better. There wasn't a reliable second option on that team who could create offense including last years Dipo.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
Re: Maybe last year's team didn't "overachieve"...they were just better
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 16,540
- And1: 6,786
- Joined: Jan 03, 2005
- Location: Miami, FL
Re: Maybe last year's team didn't "overachieve"...they were just better
bondom34 wrote:Oh ffs really people turning on Russ lol. Last years team was better at pf and backup big for sure. Starting 2 as well. But the season being only about him is whatever makes you feel better
if you adjust russ' pull-up shot attempt eFG% and FT% ALONE to last year's percentages you improve our offense by nearly 2pp100 when he's in the game. to say nothing of his three point shooting, increased turnovers, etc.
russ' issues to start the year is the biggest difference between last year's team and this year's team offensively.
Re: Maybe last year's team didn't "overachieve"...they were just better
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,301
- And1: 2,234
- Joined: Jul 08, 2015
Re: Maybe last year's team didn't "overachieve"...they were just better
slick_watts wrote:bondom34 wrote:Oh ffs really people turning on Russ lol. Last years team was better at pf and backup big for sure. Starting 2 as well. But the season being only about him is whatever makes you feel better
if you adjust russ' pull-up shot attempt eFG% and FT% ALONE to last year's percentages you improve our offense by nearly 2pp100 when he's in the game. to say nothing of his three point shooting, increased turnovers, etc.
russ' issues to start the year is the biggest difference between last year's team and this year's team offensively.
I really don't think he has been healthy. He finally looks different the last 3 games. Didn't seem like his knees were all there. Of course, that's all speculation, but something was definitely wrong.
Re: Maybe last year's team didn't "overachieve"...they were just better
-
- Forum Mod - Thunder
- Posts: 13,387
- And1: 7,523
- Joined: Mar 22, 2015
-
Re: Maybe last year's team didn't "overachieve"...they were just better
Our defense (and offensive potential) will allow us to win games against GREAT teams. Last year we couldn't beat a ''good'' team unless Westbrook was 50/10/10
Re: Maybe last year's team didn't "overachieve"...they were just better
- Osirus89
- Starter
- Posts: 2,148
- And1: 2,017
- Joined: Nov 23, 2016
-
Re: Maybe last year's team didn't "overachieve"...they were just better
Dadouv47 wrote:Our defense (and offensive potential) will allow us to win games against GREAT teams. Last year we couldn't beat a ''good'' team unless Westbrook was 50/10/10
Hell.. we couldn't beat the Magic without him going nuclear towards the end of last season.
This starting premise is invalid. This years team is far better than last years team. Remember Taj and McDermott were not on the start of last years team. We were looking forward to Cameron Payne coming back and had Morrow, Lauvergne, Singler playing rotation minutes with a rookie starting at PF.

Jerami was a space cadet on the floor last season being put at SF and Steven looked horrible at times last season.
This team is better. By a massive margin. They have underperformed up to this point. Last year, Russ was out of his mind.
Oops I forgot about Semaj as the back up point. Nuff said.
Re: Maybe last year's team didn't "overachieve"...they were just better
- Funcrusher
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,084
- And1: 6,569
- Joined: Apr 14, 2017
- Location: Stolen from Africa
-
Re: Maybe last year's team didn't "overachieve"...they were just better
Knrstz wrote:Thundershock88 wrote:Last years "team" was terrible. Russell was the team. We had Semaj Christon getting valuable minutes off the bench.... We would have been lucky to win 30 games if 'Brook didn't go all time mode.
I think you could argue that last years team was better at every position except backup pg and small forward.

gh123 wrote:Zion lucky if he gets 18 ppg on decent efficiency. Midget big man is a no-career in NBA. Chuck being the only wonder. Zion is the next Tractor Trailer at best.
Re: Maybe last year's team didn't "overachieve"...they were just better
- ThunderBolt
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 19,340
- And1: 19,166
- Joined: Dec 29, 2016
- Location: Lynnwood, WA
-
Re: Maybe last year's team didn't "overachieve"...they were just better
BobThunder wrote:Knrstz wrote:Thundershock88 wrote:Last years "team" was terrible. Russell was the team. We had Semaj Christon getting valuable minutes off the bench.... We would have been lucky to win 30 games if 'Brook didn't go all time mode.
I think you could argue that last years team was better at every position except backup pg and small forward.
Not every position but many of them.
Last years russ > this years russ
Taj and Sabonis > Patterson and Melo
Enes > Dakari
Oladipo> Roberson
Abrines has been the same
I dont know about Huestis vs McDermott
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
Re: Maybe last year's team didn't "overachieve"...they were just better
- Funcrusher
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,084
- And1: 6,569
- Joined: Apr 14, 2017
- Location: Stolen from Africa
-
Re: Maybe last year's team didn't "overachieve"...they were just better
Knrstz wrote:BobThunder wrote:Knrstz wrote:
I think you could argue that last years team was better at every position except backup pg and small forward.
Not every position but many of them.
Last years russ > this years russ
Taj and Sabonis > Patterson and Melo
Enes > Dakari
Oladipo> Roberson
Abrines has been the same
I dont know about Huestis vs McDermott
Overall though I think the center position has been better this year. Adams>Last Year Adams/Enes. Dakari has showed some promise in the limited minutes Donovan gives him, and at this point I think he should be getting the necessary playing time as their backup big.
I don't think Taj and Sabonis have been better than Patterson and Melo, and if so only slightly.
gh123 wrote:Zion lucky if he gets 18 ppg on decent efficiency. Midget big man is a no-career in NBA. Chuck being the only wonder. Zion is the next Tractor Trailer at best.
Re: Maybe last year's team didn't "overachieve"...they were just better
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,430
- And1: 1,865
- Joined: Jun 05, 2014
-
Re: Maybe last year's team didn't "overachieve"...they were just better
Knrstz wrote:Not every position but many of them.
Last years russ > this years russ
Taj and Sabonis > Patterson and Melo
Enes > Dakari
Oladipo> Roberson
Abrines has been the same
I dont know about Huestis vs McDermott
Compared to last year up to THIS point:
Russ < Russ
Roberson = Roberson
PG > Dipo
Melo = Sabonis
Adams > Adams
Dakari > Enes
Felton > Semaj
Abrines = Abrines
Patterson = Lauvergne
Huestis = Singler
Grant = Grant
Russ of last year was better. Adams of this year has been better. Roberson is a push. PG and Melo is better, in totality, then Dipo and Sabonis although it is much closer then most expected. Russ has been enough worse then last year that it makes the starters worse so far. The bench is slightly better with Felton being the most significant upgrade, but Dakari has been better then Enes on a per minute basis if we still care about the scoreboard more then individual ppg and Patterson is better then Lauvergne.
I don't consider it fair to include Taj and McDermott when talking about the team this year because they were deadline additions and Presti could pull off another crazy deadline trade to improve the depth issues. After the deadline and we are talking about how this year's team will stack up to last year comparing the playoff rosters of both teams is fair, but until the deadline I will give Presti time to add another Taj type of player to the bench, preferably a wing instead of a PF.
"The secret to success is to offend the greatest number of people." -George Bernard Shaw
Re: Maybe last year's team didn't "overachieve"...they were just better
-
- Forum Mod - Thunder
- Posts: 13,387
- And1: 7,523
- Joined: Mar 22, 2015
-
Re: Maybe last year's team didn't "overachieve"...they were just better
Kizz Fastfists wrote:Knrstz wrote:Not every position but many of them.
Last years russ > this years russ
Taj and Sabonis > Patterson and Melo
Enes > Dakari
Oladipo> Roberson
Abrines has been the same
I dont know about Huestis vs McDermott
Compared to last year up to THIS point:
Russ < Russ
Roberson = Roberson
PG > Dipo
Melo = Sabonis
Adams > Adams
Dakari > Enes
Felton > Semaj
Abrines = Abrines
Patterson = Lauvergne
Huestis = Singler
Grant = Grant
Russ of last year was better. Adams of this year has been better. Roberson is a push. PG and Melo is better, in totality, then Dipo and Sabonis although it is much closer then most expected. Russ has been enough worse then last year that it makes the starters worse so far. The bench is slightly better with Felton being the most significant upgrade, but Dakari has been better then Enes on a per minute basis if we still care about the scoreboard more then individual ppg and Patterson is better then Lauvergne.
I don't consider it fair to include Taj and McDermott when talking about the team this year because they were deadline additions and Presti could pull off another crazy deadline trade to improve the depth issues. After the deadline and we are talking about how this year's team will stack up to last year comparing the playoff rosters of both teams is fair, but until the deadline I will give Presti time to add another Taj type of player to the bench, preferably a wing instead of a PF.
Grant > Grant and it's not close. Not a big fan but he improved a lot.
And would say Melo = Taj (not Sabonis)
Dakari over Enes is though to say. Kanter's scoring would be helpful this year.
Re: Maybe last year's team didn't "overachieve"...they were just better
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,430
- And1: 1,865
- Joined: Jun 05, 2014
-
Re: Maybe last year's team didn't "overachieve"...they were just better
Dadouv47 wrote:Dakari over Enes is though to say. Kanter's scoring would be helpful this year.
Dakari has a better Ortg, Drtg and RPM then Kanter had last year. If they would give Dakari enough minutes then I think it would turn into a very interesting discussion. The problem is that Dakari has played 113 minutes all season while Kanter was playing that every 5.5 games. There is no reason not to be giving Dakari 20 MPG for a few weeks to see if the numbers hold up or are just a result of SSS. Dakari isn't going to put up the same point that Enes did, but Dakari is averaging over 2 steals and blocks per 100 possessions and along with his rebounding could help with easy transition baskets and closing out defensive possessions.
"The secret to success is to offend the greatest number of people." -George Bernard Shaw
Return to Oklahoma City Thunder