It can be argued that his inability to stay on the court cost us a title in 2016.spearsy23 wrote:I don't understand any ill will toward Kanter. He literally didn't do anything wrong.
Sent from my Redmi Note 5 using RealGM mobile app
Moderators: retrobro90, Dadouv47
It can be argued that his inability to stay on the court cost us a title in 2016.spearsy23 wrote:I don't understand any ill will toward Kanter. He literally didn't do anything wrong.
Pillendreher wrote:It can be argued thatgl his inability to stay on the court cost us a title in 2016.spearsy23 wrote:I don't understand any ill will toward Kanter. He literally didn't do anything wrong.
Sent from my Redmi Note 5 using RealGM mobile app
spearsy23 wrote:I don't understand any ill will toward Kanter. He literally didn't do anything wrong.
Pillendreher wrote:It can be argued that his inability to stay on the court cost us a title in 2016.spearsy23 wrote:I don't understand any ill will toward Kanter. He literally didn't do anything wrong.
Sent from my Redmi Note 5 using RealGM mobile app
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
Kizz Fastfists wrote:spearsy23 wrote:I don't understand any ill will toward Kanter. He literally didn't do anything wrong.
I don't think it is ill will not to want Aldrich, err, Kanter back in OKC in a significant role. It is wanting them to have good players.
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
spearsy23 wrote:And it can be argued that Andre Roberson's inability to drop 20 per game on 40% 3 point shooting did the same.
spearsy23 wrote:Enes worked, he has transformed his body and put in the time and effort, it's pointless to blame the guy for being bad at part of the game when he tries to improve.
Pillendreher wrote:spearsy23 wrote:And it can be argued that Andre Roberson's inability to drop 20 per game on 40% 3 point shooting did the same.
No, it can not. That is such a lazy argument. This team has shown that it can be elite with Andre Roberson on the floor. On BOTH ends of the floor. Meanwhile, it is impossible to field a good defense with Enes Kanter on the floor. It has never been done and it will never be done. And while we're at it: Roberson was making 1/16th of what Kanter was making back in 15/16. The Thunder were spending more than 20 % of their total payroll on Kanter that season. We're not talking about Kyle Korver getting the MLE here.
spearsy23 wrote:Enes worked, he has transformed his body and put in the time and effort, it's pointless to blame the guy for being bad at part of the game when he tries to improve.
You don't get trophies for "trying" in the NBA. He is still one of the worst at it and is still tanking his team's defense. Always has, always will be.
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
spearsy23 wrote:That's just as ridiculous as blaming robes for not being Klay offensively, or Dion for not being prime ginobili.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
Knrstz wrote:I like the uniforms. Fight me.
Coxy wrote:I think with a PG like George Hill, they'd be better than current.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
NaturalThunder wrote:Knrstz wrote:I like the uniforms. Fight me.
I do too. These are the best uniforms are the best in OKC history. I know that's saying absolutely nothing since we may have the worst logo and color scheme combo in the NBA, but these uniforms are awesome in my opinion.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
Thabo Sefolosha wrote:
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
Coxy wrote:I think with a PG like George Hill, they'd be better than current.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
Coxy wrote:I think with a PG like George Hill, they'd be better than current.
Return to Oklahoma City Thunder