slick_watts wrote:Pillendreher wrote:slick_watts wrote:
iirc, katz's take was mostly centered around the players and the locker room. like a sense of disbelief that they were losing.
the thunder have for years been purported as one of the most data-driven teams in the nba. this characterization is at odds with a lot of what we end up seeing from player decision making, to lineup decision making, and even to front office decision making. i think that the thunder must know as an organization how they have to win games with this roster if they are going to win them. it's a question of where the disconnect happens. i thought that even though the offense was garbo the first few months of the year, that was probably the way the thunder had to play to win consistently.
It has to start with solid defensive effort all night long. But that has been quite rare these last 3 months:
i think focus is a more appropriate word than effort. there are times in the last couple months everyone is running around a lot and putting in a lot of 'effort' but we're getting scored on. relying so much on opponent tov% seems unsustainable, perhaps.
I guess it's both. Our style requires a lot of effort, but it's also useless without focus.
Regarding opp TOV%: Heading into January 6, the Thunder's four factor stats would rank as following on the whole season:
opp eFG%: 50.6 - 2nd
opp FTr: 0.263 - 18th
opp TOV%: 17.7 - 1st
opp ORB%: 26.1 - 8th
So I'd disagree with the notion that they were just relying on opp TOV%. But since January 6, everything has gone to ****:
opp eFG%: 53.6 - 24th
opp FTr: 0.281 - 26th
opp TOV%: 14.6 - 10th
opp ORB%: 27.0 - 12th
If you don't defend shots and send teams to the line all the time, you're going to struggle defending well.
Contest 2P%: 72.9 | 73.5
Contest 3P%: 80.7 | 79.6
In the "contest" data it's not as apparent though. Interestingly enough, pbpstats' data points toward luck being a factor:
Whereas opponents shot worse than expected against us based on their shot quality metric in the first 38 games (0.53 expected, .51 real), teams have outperformed expectations after game 38 (.053 expected, .536 real). And in both instances, we were in the bottom 10 in expected opposing eFG%, ie we gave up better shots than other teams.
"I don't know of any player that, when the shot goes up, he doesn't want it to go in," Donovan said