thor19 wrote:talking about ben simmons if the sixers make him available in a trade would you trade our picks to get him lets say three picks and cp3 and two seconds for ben ?
I'd trade 8 picks for that deal.
Moderators: retrobro90, Dadouv47
thor19 wrote:talking about ben simmons if the sixers make him available in a trade would you trade our picks to get him lets say three picks and cp3 and two seconds for ben ?
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
thor19 wrote:talking about ben simmons if the sixers make him available in a trade would you trade our picks to get him lets say three picks and cp3 and two seconds for ben ?
ThunderBolt wrote:getrichordie wrote:ThunderBolt wrote:You mean a sign and trade or are you saying once we sign him then look for a suitor after he becomes eligible for a trade?
I'm saying that either/or has a high percentage chance of happening.
I’m not interested in the latter. I suspect trading for value at a later time is what Cleveland thought would happen with kevin love’s extension.
thor19 wrote:talking about ben simmons if the sixers make him available in a trade would you trade our picks to get him lets say three picks and cp3 and two seconds for ben ?
Thunder Up wrote:bondom34 wrote:Thunder Up wrote:
Beal was borderline. Hell, maybe even Klay could be considered borderline. Basically every single player who received a third place vote is borderline all-nba by your definition of borderline. borderline. border. line.
Ah yes, such awful players as Bradley Beal and Klay Thompson.
Guys who received quadruple and more than double the votes.
Gobert is a top 10 player in the NBA by the way
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
thor19 wrote:talking about ben simmons if the sixers make him available in a trade would you trade our picks to get him lets say three picks and cp3 and two seconds for ben ?
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
Thunder Up wrote:thor19 wrote:talking about ben simmons if the sixers make him available in a trade would you trade our picks to get him lets say three picks and cp3 and two seconds for ben ?
if he figured out how to shoot a basketball, or the Thunder didn't have Adams anymore then sure
getrichordie wrote:ThunderBolt wrote:getrichordie wrote:
I'm saying that either/or has a high percentage chance of happening.
I’m not interested in the latter. I suspect trading for value at a later time is what Cleveland thought would happen with kevin love’s extension.
Big difference between an ~$30M player (who is acting like a diva) and a ~$20M player (who has so far been the consummate professional.)
For the sake of argument, let's say we let Gallinari walk. How do you plan on addressing the hole at the 4? Personally, my philosophy is we should have some vets/high-charachter guys in place while we let our young guys develop in the wings.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
getrichordie wrote:Thunder Up wrote:thor19 wrote:talking about ben simmons if the sixers make him available in a trade would you trade our picks to get him lets say three picks and cp3 and two seconds for ben ?
if he figured out how to shoot a basketball, or the Thunder didn't have Adams anymore then sure
I do not want to go back to a point guard that can't space the floor.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
ThunderBolt wrote:getrichordie wrote:ThunderBolt wrote:I’m not interested in the latter. I suspect trading for value at a later time is what Cleveland thought would happen with kevin love’s extension.
Big difference between an ~$30M player (who is acting like a diva) and a ~$20M player (who has so far been the consummate professional.)
For the sake of argument, let's say we let Gallinari walk. How do you plan on addressing the hole at the 4? Personally, my philosophy is we should have some vets/high-charachter guys in place while we let our young guys develop in the wings.
No one isn’t not trading for Love because he’s unhappy there. Gallo’s contract wouldn’t be as bad as love’s but if he starts having negative injuries, it becomes a negative contract very quickly. It was viewed as a bad one two years ago when he missed so many games.
It’s a little early to start coming up with ideas for addressing the four for next year. Bazley should be a little better and get more minutes. We don’t know what we’ll do with our draft picks yet. I’m ok for having some vets around but we don’t need a vet at every position to mentor each young guy. With shai starting year three, I’m in favor of using some of our assets to get a young player to pair with him.
ThunderBolt wrote:getrichordie wrote:Thunder Up wrote:
if he figured out how to shoot a basketball, or the Thunder didn't have Adams anymore then sure
I do not want to go back to a point guard that can't space the floor.
I would do it. Simmons can’t shoot but he doesn’t jack up 7 threes a game and plays great defense. It could be compensated for but I agree that Adams would need to go. The roster would need to be built like the bucks have done with Giannis.
getrichordie wrote:Also, has anyone addressed the luxury tax issue? Aren't we something like ~700K away from ducking the luxury tax. Surely, we are going to make a small move to get under, right?
slick_watts wrote:getrichordie wrote:Also, has anyone addressed the luxury tax issue? Aren't we something like ~700K away from ducking the luxury tax. Surely, we are going to make a small move to get under, right?
they'll go deeper into the tax when they convert lu dort's contract, which seems likely to happen. he has to be getting close to the 45 day limit. the only way they'd be able to get under is doing something with andre roberson. figuring out a buyout that gets him to leave money on the table or whatever. barring that, it seems tax wasn't a big priority. especially since they did the patton-roby trade a couple weeks ago.
Balkman32 wrote:There might be an injury exception for Andre where they can remove his salary from the final books.
getrichordie wrote:ThunderBolt wrote:getrichordie wrote:
I do not want to go back to a point guard that can't space the floor.
I would do it. Simmons can’t shoot but he doesn’t jack up 7 threes a game and plays great defense. It could be compensated for but I agree that Adams would need to go. The roster would need to be built like the bucks have done with Giannis.
Admittedly, I haven't been able to watch him much as of recent. Russ had at least a solid mid-range game for a good bit of his tenure while with the Thunder. Does Simmons even have that or is he mostly just muscle-ing (sp?) his way into the paint?
Thunder Up wrote:getrichordie wrote:ThunderBolt wrote:I would do it. Simmons can’t shoot but he doesn’t jack up 7 threes a game and plays great defense. It could be compensated for but I agree that Adams would need to go. The roster would need to be built like the bucks have done with Giannis.
Admittedly, I haven't been able to watch him much as of recent. Russ had at least a solid mid-range game for a good bit of his tenure while with the Thunder. Does Simmons even have that or is he mostly just muscle-ing (sp?) his way into the paint?
He has zero jump shot from anywhere on the floor, and lacks regular aggression.... regardless of his length and athleticism is very easy to guard once playoff basketball comes around
getrichordie wrote:Thunder Up wrote:getrichordie wrote:
Admittedly, I haven't been able to watch him much as of recent. Russ had at least a solid mid-range game for a good bit of his tenure while with the Thunder. Does Simmons even have that or is he mostly just muscle-ing (sp?) his way into the paint?
He has zero jump shot from anywhere on the floor, and lacks regular aggression.... regardless of his length and athleticism is very easy to guard once playoff basketball comes around
Dude sounds like a passive LeBron w/o the drive to get better.
Return to Oklahoma City Thunder